[R] Trolling in Ukraine Thread

[Tarsonis]

Emphasis added.

Youd have to be a complete imbecile to believe that. War is not profitable, imagine global trade halting because everyone was fighting. You remember how rich everybody was after ww2 right? Oh wait, they werent because their entire working population got turned to ground beef. America was the exception because they entered last and swept up with fresh faces. But I guess the Israelis and Palestinians are rolling in the dough right now along with the Russians and Ukrainians.

Finally someone who gets it, war is not financially lucrative. Dont let the suicide cult imbeciles convince you otherwise.

stop obsessing over my posts.

I know some of you have no grasp of nuance so I'll dumb it down for the cheapseats. Bombs arent groceries. The money spent on them doesn't go back into the economy. Money for bombs goes back into researching and developing better bombs. Those bombs disrupt the supply chain for groceries, which have a bigger impact on world economy. You can learn all about it in this place called University.

[Crazy girl]

viewtopic.php?f=20&t=535278&p=40978397#p40978397

[Tarsonis]

https://forum.nationstates.net/viewtopic.php?f=20&t=535278&p=40978397#p40978397

Danke

[Terminus Station]

Id like to appeal.

You are objectively an imbecile if you want to use war to create profit. World History backs me up on this. Putin's war on Ukraine is an example of this.

And I am using the "foolish" definition when I invoke the word imbecile. A person who creates war for a profit is a fool. And anyone who can't seem to grasp this simple concept does need dumbing down of the topic. And as the replies before mine show, some people did in fact need dumbing down of the topic.

[Lamoni]

Appeal Denied.

A reasonable reader would not be making the distinctions that you have brought up.

[Terminus Station]

Appeal Denied.

A reasonable reader would not be making the distinctions that you have brought up.

So you deny that a person like Putin is in fact not an imbecile for creating conflict to create wealth? Nor are those who subscribe to the same mentality? A reasonable reader would understand I was referencing people of low empathy and intelligence instead of any specific person or group in the forums. I would also remind you that these comments are taken out of context and are in reply to the person I was posting to. They are separate comments. Who exactly am I trolling? You WOULD be an imbecile to support war profiteering.

[Terminus Station]

can I get an update on this? All i did was call pro-war profiteers imbeciles. If that insults users like tarsonis, thats more on them the same way calling pro-war crimes people imbeciles.

[Frisbeeteria]

can I get an update on this?

No. You've had your ruling and your appeal was denied. The fact that you disagree with the ruling doesn't mean you get to endlessly argue about it.

[Reploid Productions]

NationStates has a formalised Appeals Process for when a player disagrees with a Moderator decision. As you have already had a first appeal of your warning, your remaining recourse is to request a Final Appeal.

EDIT: Semi-ninja'd by Fris!

[Terminus Station]

can I get an update on this?

No. You've had your ruling and your appeal was denied. The fact that you disagree with the ruling doesn't mean you get to endlessly argue about it.

I also would like to make the statement that I think anyone who supports nazi ideology must be an imbecile.

Does that fall in the same ruling? Why or why not?

[Sedgistan]

No. You've had your ruling and your appeal was denied. The fact that you disagree with the ruling doesn't mean you get to endlessly argue about it.

I also would like to make the statement that I think anyone who supports nazi ideology must be an imbecile.

Does that fall in the same ruling? Why or why not?

*** 3 day ban for trolling ***

I hope that answers your question.