Fox News could soon be banned from Canadian cable

[Des-Bal]

Unhuh. You are worth a laugh. I will give you that.

I'm worth a bunch, I presume it's why you've elected to subordinate yourself to me.

[Soviet Haaregrad]

I thought you didn’t care?

I don't but I've acknowledged your submission to my superior values.

*shrugs*

So you're playing the 'I Win Because I Win' Card? Go get your pacifier and let the adults have their discussion.

[EuroStralia]

You seem to have ignored the part were I said that wasn't free speech.

give a good reason why it isn't free speech, that isn't in relation to the technicality that it isn't spoken.

Porn isn't speech, and is actualy harmful.

[Soviet Haaregrad]

give a good reason why it isn't free speech, that isn't in relation to the technicality that it isn't spoken.

Porn isn't speech, and is actualy harmful.

The courts disagree with you and their opinion is worth far more than yours.

[Des-Bal]

So you're playing the 'I Win Because I Win' Card? Go get your pacifier and let the adults have their discussion.

Yeah? If you kiss my ring I win. I mean if you have a belief system contradictory to mine that you are willing to further then that's something we can talk about.

[EuroStralia]

Porn isn't speech, and is actualy harmful.

The courts disagree with you and their opinion is worth far more than yours.

Why?

[Soviet Haaregrad]

What is and isn't free speech is usually up to the courts to decide, but thanks for demonstrating that you agree that there should be some sort of limits when it comes to what speech is protected and what speech is not.

Now that we've gotten that out of the way, back to discussing how to define reasonable limits.

You seem to have ignored the part were I said that wasn't free speech.

I didn't miss the part where you were wrong. You can claim whatever nonsense you like but it just makes you less credible.

[Undemocacy]

give a good reason why it isn't free speech, that isn't in relation to the technicality that it isn't spoken.

Porn isn't speech, and is actualy harmful.

(I'm going to ignore the first part because semantics are not a good argument as they prove nothing other than one sides inability to understand context, or lack of a good argument)

The only argument you've made here is that it isn't ok because it is harmful, which is correct.
Speech (even if it isn't technically speech) isn't ok when it causes harm.

[Soviet Haaregrad]

The courts disagree with you and their opinion is worth far more than yours.

Why?

Because you're not the arbitrator of laws like the courts are. You're some uninformed rando on the internet, how would your opinion carry the same weight as the Supreme Court?

[EuroStralia]

You seem to have ignored the part were I said that wasn't free speech.

I didn't miss the part where you were wrong. You can claim whatever nonsense you like but it just makes you less credible.

How is p*rn speech.

[EuroStralia]

Porn isn't speech, and is actualy harmful.

(I'm going to ignore the first part because semantics are not a good argument as they prove nothing other than one sides inability to understand context, or lack of a good argument)

The only argument you've made here is that it isn't ok because it is harmful, which is correct.
Speech (even if it isn't technically speech) isn't ok when it causes harm.

Speech doesn't cause harm.

[Soviet Haaregrad]

I didn't miss the part where you were wrong. You can claim whatever nonsense you like but it just makes you less credible.

How is p*rn speech.

Did you miss the article I linked explain it?

[Undemocacy]

I didn't miss the part where you were wrong. You can claim whatever nonsense you like but it just makes you less credible.

How is p*rn speech.

(semantics are not a good argument as they prove nothing other than one sides inability to understand context, or lack of a good argument)

stop arguing semantics, it only shows you have no actual argument.

[Necroghastia]

(I'm going to ignore the first part because semantics are not a good argument as they prove nothing other than one sides inability to understand context, or lack of a good argument)

The only argument you've made here is that it isn't ok because it is harmful, which is correct.
Speech (even if it isn't technically speech) isn't ok when it causes harm.

Speech doesn't cause harm.

So if I were to, say, spread it around your community that you were a child groomer, that wouldn't be harmful?

[The Black Forrest]

The courts disagree with you and their opinion is worth far more than yours.

Why?

Obscenity isn’t protected.

https://www.justice.gov/criminal-ceos/o ... 20offenses.

[Soviet Haaregrad]

How is p*rn speech.

(semantics are not a good argument as they prove nothing other than one sides inability to understand context, or lack of a good argument)

stop arguing semantics

You go to war with the army you've got. If one has nothing but semantics, they'll resort to arguing semantics.

[EuroStralia]

You seem to have ignored the part were I said that wasn't free speech.

give a good reason why it isn't free speech, that isn't in relation to the technicality that it isn't spoken.

https://nypost.com/2019/12/09/porn-isnt ... -anywhere/

Speech doesn't cause harm.

So if I were to, say, spread it around your community that you were a child groomer, that wouldn't be harmful?

That would be slander, you would be breaking the law and the Eighth Commandment.

[Necroghastia]

give a good reason why it isn't free speech, that isn't in relation to the technicality that it isn't spoken.

https://nypost.com/2019/12/09/porn-isnt ... -anywhere/

So if I were to, say, spread it around your community that you were a child groomer, that wouldn't be harmful?

That would be slander, you would be breaking the law and the Eighth Commandment.

But it's speech. Speech doesn't cause harm.

[Undemocacy]

That would be slander, you would be breaking the law and the Eighth Commandment.

But it's speech. Speech doesn't cause harm.

No that's only true when EuroStralia says it.

[Soviet Haaregrad]

https://nypost.com/2019/12/09/porn-isnt-free-speech-on-the-web-or-anywhere/

Just some other rando's opinion. It carries as much weight as a dry fart.

[EuroStralia]

https://nypost.com/2019/12/09/porn-isnt ... -anywhere/
That would be slander, you would be breaking the law and the Eighth Commandment.

But it's speech. Speech doesn't cause harm.

You're correct, the lie you're spreading does.

[Undemocacy]

give a good reason why it isn't free speech, that isn't in relation to the technicality that it isn't spoken.

https://nypost.com/2019/12/09/porn-isnt ... r-anywhere.

You didn't read that, did you?
It never claims it isn't speach, it instead says that it causes harm so it should be banned. Which I personally agree with.

[Undemocacy]

But it's speech. Speech doesn't cause harm.

You're correct, the lie you're spreading does.

Do you see how that could be applied to fox "news"?

[Necroghastia]

But it's speech. Speech doesn't cause harm.

You're correct, the lie you're spreading does.

But that is my speech. And speech does not cause harm.

[Querria]

Fuck Fox News.

Thanks for the amazing insight.