Jar Wattinree wrote:North Korea Kim wrote:This proposal is utterly preposterous.
Says this guy.you guys will be raided soon, raider regions are uniting to overthrow the TSP government, Prime Minister.
Oh shut up you pubescent child
Advertisement
by North Korea Kim » Sun Apr 23, 2023 12:12 pm
Jar Wattinree wrote:North Korea Kim wrote:This proposal is utterly preposterous.
Says this guy.you guys will be raided soon, raider regions are uniting to overthrow the TSP government, Prime Minister.
by URA World Assembly Affairs » Sun Apr 23, 2023 12:33 pm
This resolution seeks to prevent the founderless region of The Communist Bloc (TCB) from acquiring a Governor by performing a “Governor-Cycle”, in which a region transitions briefly to frontier and back again. The proposal is brief and argues simply that due to the raiding activities of the People’s Revolutionary Air Force (PRAF), TCB is not deserving of the protection and security that would come with having a governor.
It is worth noting that this resolution is an explicit and unapologetic attempt to remove regional sovereignty from a region, barring them from an essential aspect of the game, for explicitly political reasons. The Alliance is unconvinced that the actions of the independent PRAF are sufficient to warrant an “offensive injunction”, and decrys this attempt to levy the Security Council in order to bring such a drastic punishment against a region simply for being unaligned with certain regions in political matters. The Alliance further dislikes the precedent it is setting, allowing influential WA regions the right to wield Injunctions as a weapon to threaten regions. We view this use of the SC and its resolutions as improper and unacceptable.
TCB is a proud, independent region, and like all regions, deserves the right to decide its own fate in the Frontier’s era. This resolution seeks to override the will of TCB’s citizenry in that regard, and we therefore STRONGLY urge a vote AGAINST this resolution.
by Reploid Productions » Sun Apr 23, 2023 1:02 pm
North Korea Kim wrote:Oh shut up you pubescent child
[violet] wrote:Maybe we could power our new search engine from the sexual tension between you two.
by La Xinga » Sun Apr 23, 2023 1:44 pm
URA World Assembly Affairs wrote:"It is worth noting that this resolution is an explicit and unapologetic attempt to remove regional sovereignty from a region...TCB is a proud, independent region...This resolution seeks to override the will of TCB’s citizenry....."
by The State of Entrus » Sun Apr 23, 2023 2:20 pm
by Mechanocracy » Sun Apr 23, 2023 3:09 pm
St Lyaos wrote:Gameplay: Exists
TCB: Plays game
SC: We decree that for TCB's crimes of Playing Game, they will not be allowed to Play New Features of Game
Great work everyone.
by North Korea Kim » Sun Apr 23, 2023 3:26 pm
Reploid Productions wrote:North Korea Kim wrote:Oh shut up you pubescent child
Users with two prior nation deletions perhaps should not be playing with flamethrowers and should instead spend some time reviewing the site rules.
*** North Korea Kim, WARNED for flaming. ***
by New Master » Sun Apr 23, 2023 4:29 pm
North Korea Kim wrote:Reploid Productions wrote:Users with two prior nation deletions perhaps should not be playing with flamethrowers and should instead spend some time reviewing the site rules.
*** North Korea Kim, WARNED for flaming. ***
Oh does it look like I care
by LFPD Soveriegn » Sun Apr 23, 2023 4:32 pm
The Greater Empire Of LFPD Sovereign
“Willst du en totalen krieg!?”
Summary: WHO GAVE THE MONARCHISTS THE COMMUNIST MANIFESTO- AND THE ENTIRE SOVIET WAR INDUSTRY!?
Local anti-tax protester suddenly qualifies for 100% tax rate after 'accounting error' | Scensarian insults Regent Clarence, raided by SIRS Battalion. | Local SIRS Anti-Corruption Figure found guilty of corruptionProud founder of the Imperial Pact/Imperial Trade Accords | I.P Ambassador to FIRE
I post, try and match half my effort, If I 'reserve'/minimum exp. 3-5 desktop lines (1-2 paragraphs) is fine, otherwise You'll get /stillme'd to hell. | Me 'doubleposting' is (not always) my way of saying I'm not happy with your response, probably due to quality/length.
by Reploid Productions » Sun Apr 23, 2023 4:36 pm
[violet] wrote:Maybe we could power our new search engine from the sexual tension between you two.
by Lyrical International Brigade » Sun Apr 23, 2023 4:38 pm
by Jar Wattinree » Sun Apr 23, 2023 4:55 pm
Lyrical International Brigade wrote:I'd love it if someone could coherently explain the difference between the "independentism-friendly" raiding that Europeia engages in
Quebecshire wrote:One tangible difference would be that Europeia has a strict no griefing policy when it does raid.
Lyrical International Brigade wrote:vs. the "independentism-hostile" raiding that TCB allegedly does. In both cases, y'all allied with raider regions to impose your will on unsuspecting regions who were minding their own business. Whence the obnoxious high horse, then?
Quebecshire wrote:Europeia also does not actively antagonize other Independent regions.
Lyrical International Brigade wrote:So that'll be a "no" then.
by Lyrical International Brigade » Sun Apr 23, 2023 5:06 pm
Jar Wattinree wrote:Lyrical International Brigade wrote:I'd love it if someone could coherently explain the difference between the "independentism-friendly" raiding that Europeia engages inQuebecshire wrote:One tangible difference would be that Europeia has a strict no griefing policy when it does raid.Lyrical International Brigade wrote:vs. the "independentism-hostile" raiding that TCB allegedly does. In both cases, y'all allied with raider regions to impose your will on unsuspecting regions who were minding their own business. Whence the obnoxious high horse, then?Quebecshire wrote:Europeia also does not actively antagonize other Independent regions.Lyrical International Brigade wrote:So that'll be a "no" then.
Only if you didn't read his post.
by Jar Wattinree » Sun Apr 23, 2023 5:18 pm
Lyrical International Brigade wrote:Perhaps you should do some reading yourself.
by Lyrical International Brigade » Sun Apr 23, 2023 6:03 pm
by Jar Wattinree » Sun Apr 23, 2023 6:07 pm
Lyrical International Brigade wrote:Perhaps I should have simply stated this instead of using passive-aggressive rhetorical questioning.
by Isaris » Sun Apr 23, 2023 8:00 pm
by Quebecshire » Sun Apr 23, 2023 8:22 pm
Isaris wrote:Evidently TCB's concern for regional sovereignty ends when you don't bow to their interests in this body. Their attempt to quorum raid several regions to stop this Injunction coming to vote showed that their words are hollow. They've made no friends with these actions and hurt their case even more in the court of public opinion. If they had continued to protest this resolution peacefully, perhaps they could've won support for a future repeal, but now? As they say in France, le big oof.
Benevolent Thomas wrote:I founded a defender organization out of my dislike of invaders, what invading represents, and my desire to see them suffer.
Pergamon wrote:I must say, you are truly what they deserve.
by Youtube Inc » Mon Apr 24, 2023 1:40 am
by Haganham » Mon Apr 24, 2023 7:54 am
Youtube Inc wrote:it worries me ever so slightly that Injunctions may become a bargaining tool for some defenders, to pressure raiders into submission, however, it seems only 3 are to be passed in the short-term, so i won't argue, but i think everyone should be warry of injunctions and how they can be used, I'm by no means on the side of the griefers but certain measures should only be for the mod's not us petty and often impartial players.
saying that
I'll be voting For
by Urkennalaid » Mon Apr 24, 2023 3:48 pm
by Witchcraft and Sorcery » Mon Apr 24, 2023 7:05 pm
Urkennalaid wrote:As a leftist nation, I am sad to say I am in full Support of this. But this decisions shouldn't be based in anti-communism, it should be a larger discussion on raiding and invading other regions. Don't let your personal views on leftism or communism, either way, be the reason you vote For or Against this decision. It should be about the responsibility a Region has to its nations and to the larger outside groups.
by Galactic Powers » Mon Apr 24, 2023 7:10 pm
Urkennalaid wrote:As a leftist nation, I am sad to say I am in full Support of this. But this decisions shouldn't be based in anti-communism, it should be a larger discussion on raiding and invading other regions. Don't let your personal views on leftism or communism, either way, be the reason you vote For or Against this decision. It should be about the responsibility a Region has to its nations and to the larger outside groups.
by Balkinour » Tue Apr 25, 2023 10:25 am
by United Calanworie » Tue Apr 25, 2023 9:10 pm
El Lazaro wrote:Common red imperialist L
El Lazaro wrote:Sacred Butterfinger wrote:This injunction isn't actually gonna do anything except make a select amount of TCBers slightly irritated.
Good.Cappedore wrote:I wish some of those in support of the proposal had something more productive to say...
Crybullies are getting what they deserve. Do I need to say anything else?
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement