NATION

PASSWORD

American Politics: The Speaker's Cornered

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

Will Kevin McCarthy Remain Speaker?

Yes
25
29%
Yes, But He'll Have Democratic Support
12
14%
No
29
33%
IDK/Other
21
24%
 
Total votes : 87

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 178224
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Ifreann » Sat Mar 25, 2023 12:20 pm

San Lumen wrote:
Ors Might wrote:Yes, completely impossible. If I'm paying union dues, I'm not going to complain that my union is really good at fulfilling it's purpose.


Apparently they just collect union dues and fuck off.


So if you have a job and all you do is make dumb videos on social media you expect your union to prevent your boss from firing you and just say on that's ok keep making your dancing videos for your followers.

Very mad that people might be making silly little videos for fun. How dare they.
He/Him
With lasers charged and ready
Our ships will cut through the night
Starfighters of Leuchars ready to fight
Torpedoes blessed by wizard, we're ready to fly
For the king, we live to die!

Saoirse don Phalaistín

User avatar
Valrifall
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1580
Founded: Nov 30, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Valrifall » Sat Mar 25, 2023 12:22 pm

Ifreann wrote:
San Lumen wrote:
So if you have a job and all you do is make dumb videos on social media you expect your union to prevent your boss from firing you and just say on that's ok keep making your dancing videos for your followers.

Very mad that people might be making silly little videos for fun. How dare they.


Heaven forbid people enjoy things while they work.
The old world is dying, and the new world struggles to be born: now is the time of monsters

User avatar
American Legionaries
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19107
Founded: Nov 03, 2021
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby American Legionaries » Sat Mar 25, 2023 12:27 pm

Valrifall wrote:
Ifreann wrote:Very mad that people might be making silly little videos for fun. How dare they.


Heaven forbid people enjoy things while they work.


I doubt Lumen approves of the peasantry enjoying anything ever.

User avatar
The Jamesian Republic
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15709
Founded: Apr 28, 2020
Ex-Nation

Postby The Jamesian Republic » Sat Mar 25, 2023 12:33 pm

Valrifall wrote:
Ifreann wrote:Weird how you're obsessed with TikTok. But yeah, employers shouldn't have any say in removing workers from the workplace. That should be up to the workers themselves. If everyone on the factory floor likes the one person doing dance videos all day, then the boss can eat shit.



Don't be silly Iffy.

We should just abolish management altogether and reorganize the whole economy to run based on co-ops, worker's councils, and/or unions.


OMG based we stan!

User avatar
Eahland
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6080
Founded: Apr 18, 2006
Libertarian Police State

Postby Eahland » Sat Mar 25, 2023 12:35 pm

American Legionaries wrote:
Valrifall wrote:
Heaven forbid people enjoy things while they work.


I doubt Lumen approves of the peasantry enjoying anything ever.

Gotta ban the Tik-toks and the Instagrams so the serfs have nothing to do but give the Democrats the votes they're so clearly entitled to. Because that is obviously how you get people to turn out and vote for you.
Eahlisc Wordboc (Glossary)
Eahlisc Healþambiht segþ: NE DRENCE, EÐA, OÞÞE ONDO BLÆCE!

User avatar
Ors Might
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9837
Founded: Nov 01, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Ors Might » Sat Mar 25, 2023 12:35 pm

San Lumen wrote:
Ors Might wrote:Yes, completely impossible. If I'm paying union dues, I'm not going to complain that my union is really good at fulfilling it's purpose.


Apparently they just collect union dues and fuck off.


So if you have a job and all you do is make dumb videos on social media you expect your union to prevent your boss from firing you and just say on that's ok keep making your dancing videos for your followers.

Let me share with you a bit of information from my work history. Whenever my job was awful, it wasn't because a coworker wasn't doing their job properly or just sucked. My jobs became awful when the shitty manager was running a shift. Them doing their job incompetently made my life hell. So yes, I'd much rather a coworker that just sat in the back doing TikTok videos than a manager that's awful. At the very least the former is staying out of my way.
https://youtu.be/gvjOG5gboFU Best diss track of all time

User avatar
Elwher
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9814
Founded: May 24, 2012
Anarchy

Postby Elwher » Sat Mar 25, 2023 12:55 pm

Ifreann wrote:
Valrifall wrote:

Don't be silly Iffy.

We should just abolish management altogether and reorganize the whole economy to run based on co-ops, worker's councils, and/or unions.

[Solidarity Forever loudly]


San Lumen wrote:
This is truly one of the dumbest arguments you've ever made. Your hired to do a job. Don' want to do said job or follow the rules Bye Felicia.

Let me tell you who knows about what does and does not contribute to a job getting done. It's not the asshole whose name is on the building, but the people on the floor actually doing the job. If the boss wants a say in what happens then they can go down there and work alongside everyone else.
If fellow workers don't like it they can quit too and make their stupid videos on someone else's dime.

Whose dime is it, Lumen? The workers are the people actually generating revenue, not the bosses.


If it weren't for the person whose name is on the building investing their time and effort in starting the business, the noble workers would not have a job in the first place.
CYNIC, n. A blackguard whose faulty vision sees things as they are, not as they ought to be. Hence the custom among the Scythians of plucking out a cynic's eyes to improve his vision.
Ambrose Bierce

User avatar
Austria-Bohemia-Hungary
Post Czar
 
Posts: 30756
Founded: Jun 28, 2011
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Austria-Bohemia-Hungary » Sat Mar 25, 2023 1:06 pm

Elwher wrote:
Ifreann wrote:[Solidarity Forever loudly]



Let me tell you who knows about what does and does not contribute to a job getting done. It's not the asshole whose name is on the building, but the people on the floor actually doing the job. If the boss wants a say in what happens then they can go down there and work alongside everyone else.

Whose dime is it, Lumen? The workers are the people actually generating revenue, not the bosses.


If it weren't for the person whose name is on the building investing their time and effort in starting the business, the noble workers would not have a job in the first place.

quaint museum article
The Holy Romangnan Empire of Ostmark
something something the sole legitimate Austria-Hungary larp'er on NS :3

MT/MagicT
The Armed Forces|Embassy Programme|The Imperial and National Anthem of the Holy Roman Empire|Characters|The Map

User avatar
Celritannia
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22897
Founded: Nov 10, 2010
New York Times Democracy

Postby Celritannia » Sat Mar 25, 2023 1:50 pm

San Lumen wrote:
American Legionaries wrote:
Dude's literally whining to you about how he got made to treat his employees with respect and decency...


I don't hate all unions but some have completely lost the point of what the movement was about.


Says the person who would rather rail workers suffer than have them strike for better pay and safety regulations.

San Lumen wrote:
American Legionaries wrote:
Your pal was hired to do a job and apparently spends his days crying to you because he was supposed to follow the rules. That's literally what started this conversation was you complaining about the rules someone was expected to work under.


This person worked there years ago. A union shouldn't make it impossible to fire someone.


That's one of the fucking points of a union. Otherwise, management can unjustly fire people for the smallest things.
Last edited by Celritannia on Sat Mar 25, 2023 1:56 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Ors Might
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9837
Founded: Nov 01, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Ors Might » Sat Mar 25, 2023 2:06 pm

Elwher wrote:
Ifreann wrote:[Solidarity Forever loudly]



Let me tell you who knows about what does and does not contribute to a job getting done. It's not the asshole whose name is on the building, but the people on the floor actually doing the job. If the boss wants a say in what happens then they can go down there and work alongside everyone else.

Whose dime is it, Lumen? The workers are the people actually generating revenue, not the bosses.


If it weren't for the person whose name is on the building investing their time and effort in starting the business, the noble workers would not have a job in the first place.

And if not for the workers working for shit pay, the business wouldn't be turning a profit at all.
https://youtu.be/gvjOG5gboFU Best diss track of all time

User avatar
Celritannia
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22897
Founded: Nov 10, 2010
New York Times Democracy

Postby Celritannia » Sat Mar 25, 2023 2:12 pm

Elwher wrote:
Ifreann wrote:[Solidarity Forever loudly]



Let me tell you who knows about what does and does not contribute to a job getting done. It's not the asshole whose name is on the building, but the people on the floor actually doing the job. If the boss wants a say in what happens then they can go down there and work alongside everyone else.

Whose dime is it, Lumen? The workers are the people actually generating revenue, not the bosses.


If it weren't for the person whose name is on the building investing their time and effort in starting the business, the noble workers would not have a job in the first place.


Yet the owners only become rich through exploitation rather than investing in their workers.

User avatar
San Lumen
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 98994
Founded: Jul 02, 2009
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby San Lumen » Sat Mar 25, 2023 4:10 pm

Celritannia wrote:
San Lumen wrote:
I don't hate all unions but some have completely lost the point of what the movement was about.


Says the person who would rather rail workers suffer than have them strike for better pay and safety regulations.

San Lumen wrote:
This person worked there years ago. A union shouldn't make it impossible to fire someone.


That's one of the fucking points of a union. Otherwise, management can unjustly fire people for the smallest things.


When is it justifiable to fire someone? My co worker had people who literally weren't doing their job and it was nearly impossible to fire them because of the union rules.

User avatar
Celritannia
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22897
Founded: Nov 10, 2010
New York Times Democracy

Postby Celritannia » Sat Mar 25, 2023 4:20 pm

San Lumen wrote:
Celritannia wrote:
Says the person who would rather rail workers suffer than have them strike for better pay and safety regulations.



That's one of the fucking points of a union. Otherwise, management can unjustly fire people for the smallest things.


When is it justifiable to fire someone? My co worker had people who literally weren't doing their job and it was nearly impossible to fire them because of the union rules.


How dare workers have their rights protected (sarcasm).
And if those rules were not in place, bosses could fire them when they want with no reason.
Last edited by Celritannia on Sat Mar 25, 2023 4:22 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Neutraligon
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 42642
Founded: Oct 01, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Neutraligon » Sat Mar 25, 2023 4:37 pm

Ifreann wrote:
San Lumen wrote:
So if you have a job and all you do is make dumb videos on social media you expect your union to prevent your boss from firing you and just say on that's ok keep making your dancing videos for your followers.

Very mad that people might be making silly little videos for fun. How dare they.


When I worked at a supermarket the elevator broke once. Storage was all upstairs thanks to the store being on a hill. Higher boss wanted us to take stuff down the stairs....Every last one of us refused. And our immediate bosses supported us. Since this is a grocery store that meant that people would not get more restock stuff meaning that some stuff was out. Wonder if Lumen would accept us calling the union if the boss had insisted (he didn't, figured out another way to get stuff down there. We actually used the lift that delivery vehicles use and brought stuff literally around outside the store).

Ors Might wrote:
San Lumen wrote:
So if you have a job and all you do is make dumb videos on social media you expect your union to prevent your boss from firing you and just say on that's ok keep making your dancing videos for your followers.

Let me share with you a bit of information from my work history. Whenever my job was awful, it wasn't because a coworker wasn't doing their job properly or just sucked. My jobs became awful when the shitty manager was running a shift. Them doing their job incompetently made my life hell. So yes, I'd much rather a coworker that just sat in the back doing TikTok videos than a manager that's awful. At the very least the former is staying out of my way.

What is the saying, people do quit bad companies, they quit bad managers. Something like that.
Last edited by Neutraligon on Sat Mar 25, 2023 4:39 pm, edited 2 times in total.
If you want to call me by a nickname, call me Gon...or NS Batman.
Mod stuff: One Stop Rules Shop | Reppy's Sig Workshop | Getting Help Request
Just A Little though

User avatar
HISPIDA
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12802
Founded: Jun 21, 2021
Ex-Nation

Postby HISPIDA » Sat Mar 25, 2023 4:40 pm

San Lumen wrote:I don't hate all unions but some have completely lost the point of what the movement was about.

basically every union has completely lost the point of what the movement was about.

User avatar
Zurkerx
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 15441
Founded: Jan 20, 2011
Anarchy

Postby Zurkerx » Sat Mar 25, 2023 5:39 pm

Top House Republicans are considering legislation to protect current and former presidents from politically motivated prosecutions. This is in response to Trump being investigated and may face an indictment from several of those investigations.
Accountant, Author, History Buff, Political Junkie, Retired Admin in NSGS & NS Parliament

NFL Picks League
A Golden Civic: Pragmatically Ambitious
"The government you elect is the government you deserve." ~ Thomas Jefferson
"Try not to become a person of success, but rather try to become a person of value." ~ Albert Einstein

User avatar
Neutraligon
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 42642
Founded: Oct 01, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Neutraligon » Sat Mar 25, 2023 5:39 pm

Zurkerx wrote:Top House Republicans are considering legislation to protect current and former presidents from politically motivated prosecutions. This is in response to Trump being investigated and may face an indictment from several of those investigations.


How do they determine if it is politically motivated.
If you want to call me by a nickname, call me Gon...or NS Batman.
Mod stuff: One Stop Rules Shop | Reppy's Sig Workshop | Getting Help Request
Just A Little though

User avatar
El Lazaro
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7930
Founded: Oct 19, 2021
Ex-Nation

Postby El Lazaro » Sat Mar 25, 2023 5:43 pm

Neutraligon wrote:
Zurkerx wrote:Top House Republicans are considering legislation to protect current and former presidents from politically motivated prosecutions. This is in response to Trump being investigated and may face an indictment from several of those investigations.


How do they determine if it is politically motivated.

If the criminal is a Republican, presumably.

User avatar
The Jamesian Republic
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15709
Founded: Apr 28, 2020
Ex-Nation

Postby The Jamesian Republic » Sat Mar 25, 2023 5:45 pm

Zurkerx wrote:Top House Republicans are considering legislation to protect current and former presidents from politically motivated prosecutions. This is in response to Trump being investigated and may face an indictment from several of those investigations.


Do they not realize Democrats could use that too?

User avatar
Port Caverton
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5204
Founded: Oct 01, 2021
Ex-Nation

Postby Port Caverton » Sat Mar 25, 2023 5:53 pm

The Jamesian Republic wrote:
Zurkerx wrote:Top House Republicans are considering legislation to protect current and former presidents from politically motivated prosecutions. This is in response to Trump being investigated and may face an indictment from several of those investigations.


Do they not realize Democrats could use that too?

They don't care about anything, except protecting that RINO.
"My fellow Americans, I'm pleased to tell you today that I've signed legislation that will outlaw Russia forever. We begin bombing in five minutes."

User avatar
Greater Miami Shores 3
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5290
Founded: Jul 24, 2021
Ex-Nation

Postby Greater Miami Shores 3 » Sat Mar 25, 2023 5:55 pm

Port Caverton wrote:
The Jamesian Republic wrote:
Do they not realize Democrats could use that too?

They don't care about anything, except protecting that RINO.

But the Democrats are using it first against Republican President Trump, as a Political Kangaroo Court. President Trump is not what you say.
Last edited by Greater Miami Shores 3 on Sat Mar 25, 2023 5:57 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Valrifall
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1580
Founded: Nov 30, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Valrifall » Sat Mar 25, 2023 5:56 pm

The Jamesian Republic wrote:
Zurkerx wrote:Top House Republicans are considering legislation to protect current and former presidents from politically motivated prosecutions. This is in response to Trump being investigated and may face an indictment from several of those investigations.


Do they not realize Democrats could use that too?


Republicans tend to govern like they're going to be the last party to be elected.

Which is probably what they want.
The old world is dying, and the new world struggles to be born: now is the time of monsters

User avatar
Greater Miami Shores 3
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5290
Founded: Jul 24, 2021
Ex-Nation

Postby Greater Miami Shores 3 » Sat Mar 25, 2023 5:58 pm

Valrifall wrote:
The Jamesian Republic wrote:
Do they not realize Democrats could use that too?


Republicans tend to govern like they're going to be the last party to be elected.

Which is probably what they want.

What do you think most Republicans say about the Democrats?
Last edited by Greater Miami Shores 3 on Sat Mar 25, 2023 5:58 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
The Jamesian Republic
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15709
Founded: Apr 28, 2020
Ex-Nation

Postby The Jamesian Republic » Sat Mar 25, 2023 5:58 pm

Greater Miami Shores 3 wrote:
Port Caverton wrote:They don't care about anything, except protecting that RINO.

But the Democrats are using it first against Republican President Trump, as a Political Kangaroo Court. President Trump is not what you say.


He is. He has destroyed the legacies of Abraham Lincoln, Theodore Roosevelt, and Dwight Eisenhower amongst others.

User avatar
Port Caverton
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5204
Founded: Oct 01, 2021
Ex-Nation

Postby Port Caverton » Sat Mar 25, 2023 5:59 pm

The Jamesian Republic wrote:
Greater Miami Shores 3 wrote:But the Democrats are using it first against Republican President Trump, as a Political Kangaroo Court. President Trump is not what you say.


He is. He has destroyed the legacies of Abraham Lincoln, Theodore Roosevelt, and Dwight Eisenhower amongst others.

Trump is a RINO because he does not follow Reagan, not because he isn't like those liberals.
"My fellow Americans, I'm pleased to tell you today that I've signed legislation that will outlaw Russia forever. We begin bombing in five minutes."

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: American Legionaries, Camtropia, Cole Whyte-Gurney, Eveline Gwen T Allison Hepburn, Ferrocarriles Argentinos, GMS, Liberza, Oceasia, Rusozak, Telhasura, The Black Forrest, The Crusader Order of Prussia, The Lazarene Republic, Uiiop, Vassenor, Yr Undeb Geltaidd

Advertisement

Remove ads