NATION

PASSWORD

[PASSED] Sex Worker Protections Act

A record of historical World Assembly debates.
User avatar
Magecastle Embassy Building A5
Diplomat
 
Posts: 517
Founded: Jul 03, 2022
Corporate Police State

[PASSED] Sex Worker Protections Act

Postby Magecastle Embassy Building A5 » Fri Sep 23, 2022 12:12 pm

This is now GA #672. Thank you to everyone who supported this, and commented on it to help make it better!

Ooc: This is a redraft of the resolution at vote, for the increasingly likely event that this is defeated. The main difference is that this eliminates the strict scrutiny test in the at-vote, as well as the old Section 4 due to duplication concerns. I do not intend to submit this immediately, and feedback remains appreciated.

The World Assembly,

Recognising the unfair discrimination, sexual assault, and poor working conditions sex workers have long been subject to solely due to their field of employment, as well as the greater risk of sexually transmitted infections sex workers and clients thereof face,

Emphasising that prosecution of sex work is also unhelpful towards protecting sex workers, as it forces sex workers to work "underground" for fear of prosecution of themselves and/or loss of job, at the expense of their safety and welfare, while also perpetuating stigmatisation of the sex industry,

Identifying the efforts of "Universal STI Counteraction" as ultimately helpful to the protection of sex workers via access to STI testing and curative medications for STIs,

Believing that further efforts are still needed, however, to specifically protect sex workers and ensure that sex work is safe for employees, consumers, and all others involved, as there are still no resolutions passed tailored to the sex industry,

Enacts as follows, subject to past World Assembly law still in force.

  1. In this resolution, "sex work" refers to the performance of sexual acts in exchange for material compensation. Further, a "state" is a member nation or any administrative or political subdivision thereof.

  2. Every state must treat employment and self-employment in sex work as a legitimate form of employment and self-employment; and accordingly treat sex work, including acts of performing, providing employment in, and purchasing the same, equally to all other legitimate forms of employment and self-employment in that state, subject to this resolution.

  3. Each member nation must offer free and safe medical products preventing STI transmission -- including vaccination and barrier contraception -- to all individuals under its jurisdiction consistently at risk of exposure to sexually-transmitted infections as a result of their employment or self-employment as a sex worker. A member nation may delegate this responsibility to its political or administrative subdivisions, so long as coverage over the entire jurisdiction of that member nation is achieved.

    1. If a state demonstrates in good faith to the General Accounting Office that it is unable to fund compliance with this mandate without causing serious damage to its economy or finances, that state shall receive funds from the World Assembly General Fund assessed by the General Accounting Office to aid the state in funding these products. States may not use such funds for any purpose other than funding such provision of these products.

    2. Sex workers and sex work clients are strongly urged to use such products in any sex work carrying risk of either pregnancy of, or transmission of sexually transmitted infections to, the client or sex worker in question, so as to minimise such risk.

  4. No person or entity may employ in sex work, consume sex work from, or sell sex work to a person who (i) lacks the mental capacity to consent to sexual acts, (ii) has not consented to said sex work, or (iii) is under the age of majority in a state of jurisdiction.

  5. Every state must address violations of sexual autonomy within the scope of sex work with the same haste and severity as such violations committed outside of the scope of the same. Further, each state must address hate crime and violence against an individual motivated by that individual's employment or self-employment as a sex worker with the same haste and severity as any other like hate crime declared under relevant national or international law.
Last edited by Goobergunchia on Mon Jul 17, 2023 11:06 pm, edited 95 times in total.

User avatar
Tinhampton
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16270
Founded: Oct 05, 2016
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Tinhampton » Fri Sep 23, 2022 12:15 pm

Your response to a WALL IFV condemning the fact that the resolution forces member states to legalise sex work is to... stop them from not fully legalising sex work. Seriously?
The Self-Administrative City of TINHAMPTON (pop. 329,537): Saffron Howard, Mayor (UCP); Lydia Anderson, WA Delegate-Ambassador

Authorships & co-authorships: SC#250, SC#251, Issue #1115, SC#267, LGA#484, LGA#491, LGA#533, LGA#540, LGA#549, SC#356, LGA#559, LGA#562, LGA#567, LGA#578, SC#374, LGA#582, SC#375, LGA#589, LGA#590, SC#382, SC#385, LGA#597, LGA#607, SC#415, LGA#647, LGA#656, LGA#664, LGA#671, LGA#674, LGA#675, LGA#677, LGA#680, Issue #1580, LGA#682, LGA#683, LGA#684, LGA#692, LGA#693, LGA#715, LGA#757, SC#526, LGA#763, LGA#788, LGA#791, LGA#792, LGA#798, LGA#799, LGA#800, LGA#807, LGA#814, LGA#817
The rest of my CV: Cup of Harmony 73 champions; Torchbearer of Aeternum; fourth-most-prolific WA author of all time; proclaimer of WZTC's move to Palmetto
Tinhampton the player: 51yo Tory woman w/Asperger's; Cambridge graduate; currently reading nothing (I'm too busy)

User avatar
Magecastle Embassy Building A5
Diplomat
 
Posts: 517
Founded: Jul 03, 2022
Corporate Police State

Postby Magecastle Embassy Building A5 » Fri Sep 23, 2022 12:16 pm

Tinhampton wrote:Your response to a WALL IFV condemning the fact that the resolution forces member states to legalise sex work is to... stop them from not fully legalising sex work. Seriously?

The draft only prohibits nations from directly punishing sex workers. There is nothing preventing nations from taking other approaches to stop the sex industry.

The current draft eliminates the strict scrutiny test in the at-vote. It does not "stop [nations] from not fully legalising sex work", as they are still allowed to regulate the industry.
Last edited by Magecastle Embassy Building A5 on Fri Sep 23, 2022 4:41 pm, edited 4 times in total.

User avatar
Heavens Reach
Minister
 
Posts: 3308
Founded: May 08, 2017
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Heavens Reach » Sat Sep 24, 2022 9:28 am

While we still fully support, we are concerned that the problem with the proposal lies in intractable ideological differences with the international community. Nonetheless, we will approve it and vote FOR again when and if you should resubmit.
Lux perditionis absolutio derelictorum est.
Chancellor | Lightbringer | Silver Spear | Champion
⧫ ⧫ Kentarche ⧫ ⧫
Compassion, unless it is consistently applied, is nothing but window dressing for self-interest.
♪♫ A hope of stardust left in time ♪♫

User avatar
Bananaistan
Senator
 
Posts: 3716
Founded: Apr 20, 2012
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Bananaistan » Sat Sep 24, 2022 1:46 pm

"Opposed. Member states should retain the right to ban sex work, or the GA should do so."
Delegation of the People's Republic of Bananaistan to the World Assembly
Head of delegation and the Permanent Representative: Comrade Ambassador Cornelius "Con" Talmadge
General Assistant and Head of Security: Comrade Watchman Brian of Tarth
There was the Pope and John F. Kennedy and Jack Charlton and the three of them were staring me in the face.
Ideological Bulwark #281
THIS

User avatar
WayNeacTia
Senator
 
Posts: 4330
Founded: Aug 01, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby WayNeacTia » Sat Sep 24, 2022 2:07 pm

I see we are going to do this fucking shit, yet again..... The reason Flib passed the CPA, was to prevent this ongoing nightmare.
Sarcasm dispensed moderately.
RiderSyl wrote:You'd really think that defenders would communicate with each other about this. I know they're not a hivemind, but at least some level of PR skill would keep Quebecshire and Quebecshire from publically contradicting eac

wait

User avatar
Attempted Socialism
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1865
Founded: Feb 21, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Attempted Socialism » Mon Sep 26, 2022 2:49 am

Heavens Reach wrote:While we still fully support, we are concerned that the problem with the proposal lies in intractable ideological differences with the international community. Nonetheless, we will approve it and vote FOR again when and if you should resubmit.

I am in agreement with this line of thinking. A 1:2 vote margin can be overcome through drafting and politicking, but you also have to consider that there is a sizeable opposition who are either strict reactionaries on this topic or don't think it's international in principle. I'll probably vote for again if you resubmit, but I can only suggest that you also evaluate whether you can actually change enough opinions to get there.


Represented in the World Assembly by Ambassador Robert Mortimer Pride, called The Regicide
Assume OOC unless otherwise indicated. My WA Authorship.
Cui Bono, quod seipsos custodes custodiunt?Who am I in real life, my opinions and notes
My NS career

User avatar
Excidium Planetis
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8624
Founded: May 01, 2014
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Excidium Planetis » Mon Sep 26, 2022 10:11 am

OOC: Given that Pallaith has expressed their opinion that you don't try this again, what is your strategy for passing this if you reattempt?

Not everything can be fixed with drafting. You will need to resort to politics to get this through.
GA Ambassador: Adelia Meritt
Ex-Ambassador: Cornelia Schultz, author of GA#355 and GA#368.
Starlight shines brighter.
Singaporean Transhumans wrote:You didn't know about Excidium? The greatest space nomads in the NS multiverse with a healthy dose (read: over 9000 percent) of realism?
Saveyou Island wrote:"Warmest welcomes to the Assembly, ambassador. You'll soon learn to hate everyone here."
New Halo wrote:Are you seriously going to let your fear of communism stop you from doing the right thing?
Tier 9 nation, according to my index.Made of nomadic fleets.

User avatar
Magecastle Embassy Building A5
Diplomat
 
Posts: 517
Founded: Jul 03, 2022
Corporate Police State

Postby Magecastle Embassy Building A5 » Mon Sep 26, 2022 11:32 am

Excidium Planetis wrote:OOC: Given that Pallaith has expressed their opinion that you don't try this again, what is your strategy for passing this if you reattempt?

Not everything can be fixed with drafting. You will need to resort to politics to get this through.

Attempted Socialism wrote:
Heavens Reach wrote:While we still fully support, we are concerned that the problem with the proposal lies in intractable ideological differences with the international community. Nonetheless, we will approve it and vote FOR again when and if you should resubmit.

I am in agreement with this line of thinking. A 1:2 vote margin can be overcome through drafting and politicking, but you also have to consider that there is a sizeable opposition who are either strict reactionaries on this topic or don't think it's international in principle. I'll probably vote for again if you resubmit, but I can only suggest that you also evaluate whether you can actually change enough opinions to get there.

Ooc: For the record, I'm redrafting this primarily because it seems that the reason for failing is not solely the principle (eg TCB, SLU and Refugia). I also do not intend to submit this immediately, until it would seem likely that this can muster sufficient political support. However, if this does fail post-redrafting, I will not be pursuing this particular topic further :)
Last edited by Magecastle Embassy Building A5 on Mon Sep 26, 2022 2:40 pm, edited 3 times in total.

User avatar
Heavens Reach
Minister
 
Posts: 3308
Founded: May 08, 2017
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Heavens Reach » Mon Sep 26, 2022 4:22 pm

Magecastle Embassy Building A5 wrote:
Excidium Planetis wrote:OOC: Given that Pallaith has expressed their opinion that you don't try this again, what is your strategy for passing this if you reattempt?

Not everything can be fixed with drafting. You will need to resort to politics to get this through.

Attempted Socialism wrote:I am in agreement with this line of thinking. A 1:2 vote margin can be overcome through drafting and politicking, but you also have to consider that there is a sizeable opposition who are either strict reactionaries on this topic or don't think it's international in principle. I'll probably vote for again if you resubmit, but I can only suggest that you also evaluate whether you can actually change enough opinions to get there.

Ooc: For the record, I'm redrafting this primarily because it seems that the reason for failing is not solely the principle (eg TCB, SLU and Refugia). I also do not intend to submit this immediately, until it would seem likely that this can muster sufficient political support. However, if this does fail post-redrafting, I will not be pursuing this particular topic further :)


Not to discourage you, but if you add up all of the votes of all of the delegates you cited, or who voiced agreement with delegates you cited -- that is, assuming you could get them all on board -- would improve the performance of your proposal at vote by ~2000 (-1000 NO, +1000 YES). You still have quite a ways to go from there. But if you insist that you can be successful in this, we support you, as long as it doesn't require betraying the spirit of the proposal as you've originally written it
Lux perditionis absolutio derelictorum est.
Chancellor | Lightbringer | Silver Spear | Champion
⧫ ⧫ Kentarche ⧫ ⧫
Compassion, unless it is consistently applied, is nothing but window dressing for self-interest.
♪♫ A hope of stardust left in time ♪♫

User avatar
Desmosthenes and Burke
Diplomat
 
Posts: 991
Founded: Oct 07, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Desmosthenes and Burke » Tue Sep 27, 2022 4:54 pm

We reiterate our stance of opposition based solely on clause 2. Which types, if any, of sex work are legal is a question that should be left to the sound discretion of member states to choose in accordance with the mores and customs
GA Links: Proposal Rules | GenSec Procedures | Questions and Answers | Passed Resolutions
Late 30s French Married in NYC
Mostly Catholic, Libertarian-ish supporter of Le Rassemblement Nationale and Republican Party
Current Ambassador: Iulia Larcensis Metili, Legatus Plenipotentis
WA Elite Oligarch since 2023
National Sovereigntist
Name: Demosthenes and Burke
Language: Latin + Numerous tribal languages
Majority Party and Ideology: Aurora Latine - Roman Nationalism, Liberal Conservatism

Hébreux 13:2 - N’oubliez pas l’hospitalité car, grâce à elle, certains, sans le savoir, ont accueilli des anges.

User avatar
Simone Republic
Minister
 
Posts: 2772
Founded: Jul 09, 2019
Capitalizt

Postby Simone Republic » Thu Sep 29, 2022 2:54 am

Tinhampton wrote:Your response to a WALL IFV condemning the fact that the resolution forces member states to legalise sex work is to... stop them from not fully legalising sex work. Seriously?


Heavens Reach wrote:While we still fully support, we are concerned that the problem with the proposal lies in intractable ideological differences with the international community. Nonetheless, we will approve it and vote FOR again when and if you should resubmit.


This appears to be one of those issues where no consensus is likely.
Last edited by Simone Republic on Thu Sep 29, 2022 2:56 am, edited 2 times in total.

User avatar
Magecastle Embassy Building A5
Diplomat
 
Posts: 517
Founded: Jul 03, 2022
Corporate Police State

Postby Magecastle Embassy Building A5 » Sun Feb 19, 2023 1:52 pm

Bump. This would be submitted depending on the outcome of Tinhampton's proposal on this topic.
Last edited by Magecastle Embassy Building A5 on Sun Feb 19, 2023 1:55 pm, edited 1 time in total.
WA authorship.
Wallenburg wrote:If you get a Nobel Prize for the time machine because you wanted to win an argument on the Internet, try to remember the little people who started you on that way.
Ever-Wandering Souls wrote:Our research and user feedback found different use cases of bullets, such as hunting, national defense, and murder. Typically, most bullets fired do not kill people. However, sometimes they do. We found that nearly 100% of users were not impacted by shooting one random user every 30 days, reducing the likelihood of a negative impact on the average user.
Comfed wrote:When I look around me at the state of real life politics, with culture war arguments over abortion and LGBT rights, and then I look at the WA and see the same debates about cannibalism, I have hope for the world.

User avatar
Second Sovereignty
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 466
Founded: Jan 02, 2023
Ex-Nation

Postby Second Sovereignty » Sun Feb 19, 2023 1:56 pm

Desmosthenes and Burke wrote:We reiterate our stance of opposition based solely on clause 2. Which types, if any, of sex work are legal is a question that should be left to the sound discretion of member states to choose in accordance with the mores and customs


OOC:
Cries of morality ring thin when illegalization of sex work leads exclusively to sexual assaults, brutalization, and human trafficking. But we shouldn't expect better from the crowd that thinks it's better to force a child through pregnancy and birth than to allow them the option of abortion.
GA Refugee of The Communist Bloc.
Puppet of Tinfect.
Raxes Sotriat, Envoy-Major to the World Assembly, Kestil, he/him
Masraan Olash, Envoy-Minor to the World Assembly, Alsuran, he/him
Maraline, Administrative Aide, Hanri, she/her


Bisexual, Transgender (She/Her), Native-American, and Actual CommunistTM.
Good Lord, I've barely made this Puppet and you want FACTBOOKS? Check again soon.

|||||||||||||||||#283||||||||||||||||||

User avatar
WayNeacTia
Senator
 
Posts: 4330
Founded: Aug 01, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby WayNeacTia » Sun Feb 19, 2023 4:00 pm

Magecastle Embassy Building A5 wrote:Bump. This would be submitted depending on the outcome of Tinhampton's proposal on this topic.

You realize you can only shock a subject so many times, before reality takes over and you have to call it?
Sarcasm dispensed moderately.
RiderSyl wrote:You'd really think that defenders would communicate with each other about this. I know they're not a hivemind, but at least some level of PR skill would keep Quebecshire and Quebecshire from publically contradicting eac

wait

User avatar
Second Sovereignty
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 466
Founded: Jan 02, 2023
Ex-Nation

Postby Second Sovereignty » Sun Feb 19, 2023 6:17 pm

Wayneactia wrote:You realize you can only shock a subject so many times, before reality takes over and you have to call it?


OOC:
Now now, you've been around well and long enough to know that even with spirited opposition, good proposals can make it through. Particularly ones with the correct policy decisions.
GA Refugee of The Communist Bloc.
Puppet of Tinfect.
Raxes Sotriat, Envoy-Major to the World Assembly, Kestil, he/him
Masraan Olash, Envoy-Minor to the World Assembly, Alsuran, he/him
Maraline, Administrative Aide, Hanri, she/her


Bisexual, Transgender (She/Her), Native-American, and Actual CommunistTM.
Good Lord, I've barely made this Puppet and you want FACTBOOKS? Check again soon.

|||||||||||||||||#283||||||||||||||||||

User avatar
WayNeacTia
Senator
 
Posts: 4330
Founded: Aug 01, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby WayNeacTia » Mon Feb 20, 2023 6:52 am

Second Sovereignty wrote:
Wayneactia wrote:You realize you can only shock a subject so many times, before reality takes over and you have to call it?


OOC:
Now now, you've been around well and long enough to know that even with spirited opposition, good proposals can make it through. Particularly ones with the correct policy decisions.

Sure they can. They also tend to have a chunk of money thrown at them in order to get them through. Then reality takes over and they are repealed very shortly thereafter.
Sarcasm dispensed moderately.
RiderSyl wrote:You'd really think that defenders would communicate with each other about this. I know they're not a hivemind, but at least some level of PR skill would keep Quebecshire and Quebecshire from publically contradicting eac

wait

User avatar
Republic of Mesque
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 117
Founded: May 01, 2020
Iron Fist Consumerists

Postby Republic of Mesque » Mon Feb 20, 2023 7:23 am

Wayneactia wrote:Then reality takes over and they are repealed very shortly thereafter.

Isn’t it what this is all about? Author thumbs up, resolution thumbs up.
Unknown author, crap resolution, WA uppities dislike, pink power ranger disapproval = resolution thumbs down, insta repeal, due to “bad policy”, “clause a is not in English” or “there is a grammar mistake and a punctuation error literally costing you the intelligibility of the proposal”. Let’s not even mention the fact that resolutions can’t be amended.

User avatar
The Ice States
Senator
 
Posts: 4474
Founded: Jun 23, 2022
Ex-Nation

Postby The Ice States » Mon Feb 20, 2023 12:24 pm

Being compared to Bitely is certainly entertaining yet not surprising when it comes from Wayne.
Last edited by The Ice States on Mon Feb 20, 2023 12:25 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Old GA Stat Effects · Style Guide · WA Authorship

"Petty tyrant", "antithetical to a better future for the WA".

User avatar
WayNeacTia
Senator
 
Posts: 4330
Founded: Aug 01, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby WayNeacTia » Mon Feb 20, 2023 12:48 pm

The Ice States wrote:Being compared to Bitely is certainly entertaining yet not surprising when it comes from Wayne.

That was directed at Timfect mainly because it was ironic.
Sarcasm dispensed moderately.
RiderSyl wrote:You'd really think that defenders would communicate with each other about this. I know they're not a hivemind, but at least some level of PR skill would keep Quebecshire and Quebecshire from publically contradicting eac

wait

User avatar
The Ice States
Senator
 
Posts: 4474
Founded: Jun 23, 2022
Ex-Nation

Postby The Ice States » Mon Feb 20, 2023 12:57 pm

Wayneactia wrote:
The Ice States wrote:Being compared to Bitely is certainly entertaining yet not surprising when it comes from Wayne.

That was directed at Timfect mainly because it was ironic.

Frankly under this interpretation your post is a non sequitur. Either you are comparing some hypothetical, non-existent proposal by "Timfect" -- said proposal certainly not being the one in the OP -- to the World Space Administration; or you are trying to compare me to Bitely and compare the existing draft to the WSA. Either way, your comment is of no value to the discussion in this thread, which exists so that problems with the draft can be discussed and resolved before it is submitted.
Last edited by The Ice States on Mon Feb 20, 2023 12:58 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Old GA Stat Effects · Style Guide · WA Authorship

"Petty tyrant", "antithetical to a better future for the WA".

User avatar
WayNeacTia
Senator
 
Posts: 4330
Founded: Aug 01, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby WayNeacTia » Mon Feb 20, 2023 8:41 pm

The Ice States wrote:
Wayneactia wrote:That was directed at Timfect mainly because it was ironic.

Frankly under this interpretation your post is a non sequitur. Either you are comparing some hypothetical, non-existent proposal by "Timfect" -- said proposal certainly not being the one in the OP -- to the World Space Administration; or you are trying to compare me to Bitely and compare the existing draft to the WSA. Either way, your comment is of no value to the discussion in this thread, which exists so that problems with the draft can be discussed and resolved before it is submitted.

Fine then, I'll compare you to Bitley and this draft to the WSA. If this somehow passes, it will very likely be repealed fairly quickly.
Sarcasm dispensed moderately.
RiderSyl wrote:You'd really think that defenders would communicate with each other about this. I know they're not a hivemind, but at least some level of PR skill would keep Quebecshire and Quebecshire from publically contradicting eac

wait

User avatar
The Ice States
Senator
 
Posts: 4474
Founded: Jun 23, 2022
Ex-Nation

Postby The Ice States » Mon Feb 20, 2023 8:47 pm

Please reread the final sentence of my post, and reflect on how it applies your post above.
Old GA Stat Effects · Style Guide · WA Authorship

"Petty tyrant", "antithetical to a better future for the WA".

User avatar
WayNeacTia
Senator
 
Posts: 4330
Founded: Aug 01, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby WayNeacTia » Tue Feb 21, 2023 7:43 am

The Ice States wrote:Please reread the final sentence of my post, and reflect on how it applies your post above.

My comment actually did provide value, and yep I will compare this to the WSA. Both are terrible policies. We tried this back in September and it failed then. Little to nothing has changed in this draft, except some word salad tossing which actually doesn't change any of the mandates. Now some questions:

A restriction specific to the sex industry with a cognisable impact of restricting the ability of individuals to participate in or purchase sex work may only be imposed by a member nation where said restriction is vital for furthering an important, practical welfare interest of sex workers or sex work clients, and this interest outweighs any limitation the restriction has on the ability of individuals to engage in or purchase sex work.

What exactly does this salad actually mean? You state "The sex industry shall be a legal field of both employment and self-employment in member nations. To that end, no member nation may penalise or outlaw all participation in, provision of employment in, purchase of, or facilitation of sex work. No person may be discriminated against for participating in, providing employment in, purchasing, or facilitating sex work", yet nations can place restrictions upon that if "said restriction is vital for furthering an important, practical welfare interest of sex workers or sex work clients, and this interest outweighs any limitation the restriction has on the ability of individuals to engage in or purchase sex work"? What is the threshold for said restrictions? If a nation were to cause a condom shortage on purpose, could they then use that as justification and thus ban sex work? Seems a tad contradictory to the spirit of the resolution doesn't it?

Each member nation must offer free, safe, and effective preventive anti-STI medical products -- including vaccination and barrier contraception -- to all individuals under its jurisdiction consistently at risk of exposure to sexually-transmitted infections as a result of their being a sex worker. Sex workers and sex work clients are strongly urged to use such products in any sex work carrying risk of either pregnancy of, or transmission of sexually transmitted infections to, the client or sex worker in question, so as to minimise such risk

Why is it up to the state to provide these things? If a couple is using condoms to prevent pregnancy, and aren't "consistently at risk of exposure to sexually-transmitted infections as a result of their being a sex worker" why are they required to pay for said protection, while a sex worker is entitled to it for free?

I am all for legalizing sex work, but this goes way to far. Sex work is legal, except...... If prudish nations decide to restrict it due to "vital welfare" concerns. No other occupation faces restrictions of that sort, so why do escorts? Allowing said restriction does nothing to protect sex workers, and in fact places them in more danger of government scrutiny.
Sarcasm dispensed moderately.
RiderSyl wrote:You'd really think that defenders would communicate with each other about this. I know they're not a hivemind, but at least some level of PR skill would keep Quebecshire and Quebecshire from publically contradicting eac

wait

User avatar
The Ice States
Senator
 
Posts: 4474
Founded: Jun 23, 2022
Ex-Nation

Postby The Ice States » Tue Feb 21, 2023 1:43 pm

Changes have been effected to the draft per the commentary above.
Old GA Stat Effects · Style Guide · WA Authorship

"Petty tyrant", "antithetical to a better future for the WA".

Next

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to WA Archives

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Northern Slatavia

Advertisement

Remove ads