NATION

PASSWORD

Alternative history

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)
User avatar
Rambhutan
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5222
Founded: Jul 28, 2004
Ex-Nation

Alternative history

Postby Rambhutan » Sat Dec 04, 2010 3:10 am

Is there a credible chain of historical events that would have resulted in the 1950s with a communist western Europe and America, and a capitalist Russia and China?
Are we there yet?

Overherelandistan wrote: I chalange you to find a better one that isnt even worse

User avatar
Mike the Progressive
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 27486
Founded: Oct 27, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Mike the Progressive » Sat Dec 04, 2010 3:12 am

I really dislike alternative history discussions as there is no practical purpose to them. Events didn't come into play that way, so to what point do we think, discuss and debate about them? What if the South won? What if the Roman Empire was still around today? And so on. Completely useless.
Last edited by Mike the Progressive on Sat Dec 04, 2010 3:12 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Sungai Pusat
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14640
Founded: Mar 27, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Sungai Pusat » Sat Dec 04, 2010 3:15 am

Rambhutan wrote:Is there a credible chain of historical events that would have resulted in the 1950s with a communist western Europe and America, and a capitalist Russia and China?

Not really, unless the attitude was different for both sides. And like Mike said, the whole discussion of it is not really able to be used as those events already happened.
Now mostly a politik discuss account.

User avatar
Syreene states
Diplomat
 
Posts: 670
Founded: Nov 19, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Syreene states » Sat Dec 04, 2010 3:17 am

Rambhutan wrote:Is there a credible chain of historical events that would have resulted in the 1950s with a communist western Europe and America, and a capitalist Russia and China?

Not that I can think of. But if you go here they might be able to help you out.

Mike the Progressive wrote:I really dislike alternative history discussions as there is no practical purpose to them. Events didn't come into play that way, so to what point do we think, discuss and debate about them? What if the South won? What if the Roman Empire was still around today? And so on. Completely useless.

Meh, It's a hobby of mine, and isn't this entire site completely useless as well, when you actually think about it?

User avatar
Alien Space Bats
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10314
Founded: Sep 28, 2009
Ex-Nation

Re: Alternative history

Postby Alien Space Bats » Sat Dec 04, 2010 5:22 am

"These states are just saying 'Yes, I used to beat my girlfriend, but I haven't since the restraining order, so we don't need it anymore.'" — Stephen Colbert, Comedian, on Shelby County v. Holder

"Do you see how policing blacks by the presumption of guilt and policing whites by the presumption of innocence is a self-reinforcing mechanism?" — Touré Neblett, MSNBC Commentator and Social Critic

"You knew damn well I was a snake before you took me in."Songwriter Oscar Brown in 1963, foretelling the election of Donald J. Trump

President Donald J. Trump: Working Tirelessly to Make Russia Great Again

User avatar
Dumb Ideologies
Post Czar
 
Posts: 47243
Founded: Sep 30, 2007
Mother Knows Best State

Postby Dumb Ideologies » Sat Dec 04, 2010 5:28 am

Rambhutan wrote:Is there a credible chain of historical events that would have resulted in the 1950s with a communist western Europe and America, and a capitalist Russia and China?


If I recall right a lot of Marxists had Germany lined up as one of the most likely places for revolution in the early twentieth century. Whenever Germany gets a big idea you better start warplane construction so a revolutionary war in Western Europe could be feasible. America? In the event of a revolution there you'd probably have been talking anarcho-syndicalism rather than state communism. Never really studied Russia or China back when I was doing history so out of ideas there.
Furthermore, I consider that feminism must be destroyed.

User avatar
South Lorenya
Senator
 
Posts: 3925
Founded: Feb 14, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby South Lorenya » Sat Dec 04, 2010 5:30 am

If Ogedei lived longer, it's entirely possible that the mongols would have conquered most or all of europe; that would change everything, and may lead to a world like what you said.
-- King DragonAtma of the Dragon Kingdom of South Lorenya.

Nagas on a plane! ^_^

User avatar
Risottia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 56475
Founded: Sep 05, 2006
New York Times Democracy

Postby Risottia » Sat Dec 04, 2010 5:52 am

Rambhutan wrote:Is there a credible chain of historical events that would have resulted in the 1950s with a communist western Europe and America, and a capitalist Russia and China?


Communist Europe and America: yes.
Capitalist Russia and China: yes.

Now BOTH simultaneously is a bit more tricky... maybe we should get back to WW1.
Let's see...

October Revolution fails, bolsheviks are ousted and its leaders escape => Russia gets pwned even more by the Central Empires in the first months.
Revolution happens in Central Europe in early 1918 as Entente and Centrale Empires soldiers decide they've had enough of that shit (expecially on the Western and Italian fronts), turn their weapons on their officers and march on the cities. Workers strike all over Central and Western Europe. European Socialists (Russian emigrè bolsheviks) seize power. In three months, Germany, Austria-Hungary, Italy, France, Belgium, the Netherlands and Serbia begin building socialist countries.
Not being attacked by the Empires anymore, the Kerenskij cabinet slowly begins rebuilding Russia.
British soldiers get back to Britain, try to spark revolution in Britain but are beaten.
1929 crisis - both USA and Britain cannot export to the European continental countries (which have become a Socialist Federation), economical shitstorm, strikes, revolts: harsh repression, local and european socialists organize the masses; Britain becomes socialist (the British Empire, though, continues in its colonies), Civil War II in America with eventual victory of the socialists who control the cities and the factories, expecially in the Eastern US - while the capitalist side controls the less-industrialized parts of the US.
nangiqatigillugu kalaałłiit nunaanni
je soutiens le canada / i stand with canada
estoy con panamá

User avatar
Rambhutan
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5222
Founded: Jul 28, 2004
Ex-Nation

Postby Rambhutan » Sat Dec 04, 2010 5:59 am

Risottia wrote:
Rambhutan wrote:Is there a credible chain of historical events that would have resulted in the 1950s with a communist western Europe and America, and a capitalist Russia and China?


Communist Europe and America: yes.
Capitalist Russia and China: yes.

Now BOTH simultaneously is a bit more tricky... maybe we should get back to WW1.
Let's see...

October Revolution fails, bolsheviks are ousted and its leaders escape => Russia gets pwned even more by the Central Empires in the first months.
Revolution happens in Central Europe in early 1918 as Entente and Centrale Empires soldiers decide they've had enough of that shit (expecially on the Western and Italian fronts), turn their weapons on their officers and march on the cities. Workers strike all over Central and Western Europe. European Socialists (Russian emigrè bolsheviks) seize power. In three months, Germany, Austria-Hungary, Italy, France, Belgium, the Netherlands and Serbia begin building socialist countries.
Not being attacked by the Empires anymore, the Kerenskij cabinet slowly begins rebuilding Russia.
British soldiers get back to Britain, try to spark revolution in Britain but are beaten.
1929 crisis - both USA and Britain cannot export to the European continental countries (which have become a Socialist Federation), economical shitstorm, strikes, revolts: harsh repression, local and european socialists organize the masses; Britain becomes socialist (the British Empire, though, continues in its colonies), Civil War II in America with eventual victory of the socialists who control the cities and the factories, expecially in the Eastern US - while the capitalist side controls the less-industrialized parts of the US.


Interesting scenario. The one I had in my head began with the French Revolution taking a slightly different turn.
Are we there yet?

Overherelandistan wrote: I chalange you to find a better one that isnt even worse

User avatar
Risottia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 56475
Founded: Sep 05, 2006
New York Times Democracy

Postby Risottia » Sat Dec 04, 2010 6:02 am

Rambhutan wrote:
Risottia wrote:
Communist Europe and America: yes.
Capitalist Russia and China: yes.

Now BOTH simultaneously is a bit more tricky... maybe we should get back to WW1.
Let's see...

October Revolution fails, bolsheviks are ousted and its leaders escape => Russia gets pwned even more by the Central Empires in the first months.
Revolution happens in Central Europe in early 1918 as Entente and Centrale Empires soldiers decide they've had enough of that shit (expecially on the Western and Italian fronts), turn their weapons on their officers and march on the cities. Workers strike all over Central and Western Europe. European Socialists (Russian emigrè bolsheviks) seize power. In three months, Germany, Austria-Hungary, Italy, France, Belgium, the Netherlands and Serbia begin building socialist countries.
Not being attacked by the Empires anymore, the Kerenskij cabinet slowly begins rebuilding Russia.
British soldiers get back to Britain, try to spark revolution in Britain but are beaten.
1929 crisis - both USA and Britain cannot export to the European continental countries (which have become a Socialist Federation), economical shitstorm, strikes, revolts: harsh repression, local and european socialists organize the masses; Britain becomes socialist (the British Empire, though, continues in its colonies), Civil War II in America with eventual victory of the socialists who control the cities and the factories, expecially in the Eastern US - while the capitalist side controls the less-industrialized parts of the US.


Interesting scenario. The one I had in my head began with the French Revolution taking a slightly different turn.


I see your drift... but I think that would have been quite too early. What about the 1848 movements?
nangiqatigillugu kalaałłiit nunaanni
je soutiens le canada / i stand with canada
estoy con panamá

User avatar
Rambhutan
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5222
Founded: Jul 28, 2004
Ex-Nation

Postby Rambhutan » Sat Dec 04, 2010 6:10 am

Risottia wrote:I see your drift... but I think that would have been quite too early. What about the 1848 movements?


Ah that makes much more sense, perfect timing as the idea had arrived.
Are we there yet?

Overherelandistan wrote: I chalange you to find a better one that isnt even worse

User avatar
Risottia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 56475
Founded: Sep 05, 2006
New York Times Democracy

Postby Risottia » Sat Dec 04, 2010 6:12 am

Rambhutan wrote:
Risottia wrote:I see your drift... but I think that would have been quite too early. What about the 1848 movements?


Ah that makes much more sense, perfect timing as the idea had arrived.

Coupling nationalist revival with democratic movements, and maybe a Neo-Luddite resurgence in Britain...
nangiqatigillugu kalaałłiit nunaanni
je soutiens le canada / i stand with canada
estoy con panamá


Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bloohete, Google [Bot], Greater Britannian Realm, Grinning Dragon, Hurdergaryp, Islas Malvinas y Antartida Argentina, Kurgao, Mercov, Neder Islands, Omerta, Orcuo, Orlavia, Philip Hansen Anselmo, Slembana, Valrifell, Velstrania

Advertisement

Remove ads