Fahran wrote:And all the misogyny?
You're trying really hard to make Tate seem neutral when he's not. Hence why I asked how bad you think the average uncle is. 'Cause my uncles don't go around trumpeting about how women are property and don't go around engaging in MLM schemes.
He explicitly did not say women are property, he was clear that wasn't his position. What he said was that a man by sheer token of being in a relationship with a woman is entitled to a share of any revenue she generates using her body. What he said was already bad, I don't know why people keep trying to spin the bad thing he said to make it sound bad.
On that note I'm not in any way suggesting he's neutral. When actual evidence was presented that he's pushing sexist ideas rather than the same out of context snippets I immediately and without equivocation said he was bad. This entire back and forth has been about the fact I think it's bad to spread sexism but don't care about someone operating a legal business.
Kubra said the difference between Tate and an uncle was that he was making money. I have at no point by word or deed said Tate was better, worse, or morally equivalent to an uncle. It is wildly unimportant how Tate stacks up to an uncle.