Vassenor wrote:The Proud Transphobe wrote:They don't. Your side directly claims your feelings override science.
Up until recently, basically yes. They would have been thinking "female", which refers to individuals who produce eggs and can typically get pregnant. The only reason for any linguistic change is your side decided to appropriate sexual terms as terms for gender, then gaslight as the majority of us continue to use it the way we've always meant.
Apparently accepting that people are more than their genitals is gaslighting now.
lol I said this before, but just because I call someone a "he" doesn't mean I think they have no characteristics other than their biological sex. I'm seriously amazed at how many opinions you have created in your head for me to have that I literally don't.
Jewish Underground State wrote:The Proud Transphobe wrote:They don't. Your side directly claims your feelings override science.
Up until recently, basically yes. They would have been thinking "female", which refers to individuals who produce eggs and can typically get pregnant. The only reason for any linguistic change is your side decided to appropriate sexual terms as terms for gender, then gaslight as the majority of us continue to use it the way we've always meant.
But is there a problem with people changing genders? Or loving the same gender?
I stated earlier that I think transition surgery is a stupid idea, but people should be allowed to do it. It's kind of like how I also think smoking is a horrible idea, but I'm opposed to outlawing or taxing cigarettes.