The Grand World Order wrote:There's a few different aspects to it, some related to each other, some not. People talking about defending their culture might agree to one, some, all, or none of these.
1: A while ago, companies in the United States realized it's easier to create one or a few astroturfed cultures to sell things to than it is to try and appeal to the many, many subcultures in the United States. This would be even more effective on an international scale.
2: Ray Sizzum, which is the answer you're obviously looking for.
3: The realization that there really isn't anywhere to go to preserve the cultures of many western nations that are increasingly allowing mass immigration. A German being culturally replaced in his homeland has nowhere to go (assuming Austria is also seeing mass immigration), but the culture of the Syrians/Libyans/etc mass immigrating to Germany will never be endangered, because their countries are never going to be pressured into accepting mass immigration.
4: A blend of 1 and 3: as there are more and more immigrant cultures in the mix, the incentive for the creation of a consumerist culture in place of trying to appeal to the many different cultures in a country becomes greater.
5: A kneejerk reaction to the sentiment that white people have no culture and that it's ok for other cultures to steamroll them in their ancestral homes- this sentiment's demonstrated in this very thread by the question "what culture?" or the notion that anyone seeking to advocate on behalf of not just white culture, but any white interests, is inherently Racist and Bad(TM). Compound this with the fact that mainstream ideology is cognizant of the negative effects of another culture moving in en masse, which they decry as gentrification and a tool of white supremacy.
lol