Yes, because it varies on time and the society when it comes to personhood. Most of the arguments resort to emotion to justify their point, when in reality this issue boils down to this. I think if people today, who decry the past, were born then they would hold the same views that are today condemned.
Now, it is one thing to acknowledge personhood, it is another to acknowledge that they possess certain rights. That is where I differ with the Right in America as much as the Left.
"Passports"
Yes, like those who want to have an abortion can cross state lines in which abortion is legal. Repealing Roe v Wade does not create a blanket ban on abortion, it is sort of the opposite of the Prohibition of Alcohol within America. States, like countries in the EU, can determine their own policies. There are regional differences and attitudes, imagine Brussels imposing their view on x when you hold the attitude of Y against your will.
"Such cases"
Should result in the death of the individual who committed the act knowingly. I want rape kits that are on the shelves to be examined, because I want such scum eliminated from society. We put down dogs for less, and such are less than dogs imo. This comes as a contradiction, but then I regard the person conceived as having no part in a crime which requires the ultimate penalty.
The justice system is a joke, that protects those who are "boys being boys" and does nothing for actual victims. Just having an abortion does not remove the post-traumatic stress involved, and it isn't justice that such scum should draw breath on this earth at the state's expense while their victim is unsupported.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/articl ... uture.html
