(Draft) Considering Reactionary’s Fascist

[Nominicia]

In many ways Reactionary’s are fascist. For 1 they are very absolutist. It is clear that they are very radical and sometimes racist. There many times are nationalist. As many would consider nationalists fascists .

From now on Reactionary’s wil have the same punishments in regions as fascists.
.Declarations against fascism will be applied to reactionary’s.
.Reactionaries in hiding will be treated the same way as fascists get punished by other declarations.

Reactionary’s may be called fascist and this would be the correct name.
.Correct name for a reactionary would be a fascist.
.Reactionary party’s must publicly state they are Fascists.

[Ventica]

You, uh, do realize that not all "nationalists" or "absolutists"... or even "reactionaries" are fascist, right?

"reactionary" especially is a super catch-all term that can mean all sorts of things depending on what a given individual may want to call themselves or call others... very often stemming directly from political or ideological purposes in the case of the latter

"nationalist", too, is quite an expansive term... depending on the one using it, it could mean anything from devoted patriot" to "war crimes enthusiast"

[Outer Sparta]

Not a good declaration draft at all.

[Bears Armed]

SC 'Declarations' can only "Declare", i.e. give an opinion or some information: Your clause starting with "From now on", and at least part of the clause after that, are therefore "illegal" and mean that the proposal as currently written would not be allowed to go to a vote.