Oh so you are just being facetious and saying things in bad faith for no reason at all, even though it looks ridiculous, gotcha. Well, I don't really get it at all, because doing such a thing really is very very strange.
Advertisement
by The New California Republic » Wed Dec 22, 2021 2:10 pm
by Godular » Wed Dec 22, 2021 2:11 pm
by Great Algerstonia » Wed Dec 22, 2021 2:11 pm
The New California Republic wrote:Great Algerstonia wrote:I am being forced to be here by my FBI handler
Oh so you are just being facetious and saying things in bad faith for no reason at all, even though it looks ridiculous, gotcha. Well, I don't really get it at all, because doing such a thing really is very very strange.
Resilient Acceleration wrote:After a period of letting this discussion run its course without my involvement due to sheer laziness and a new related NS project, I have returned with an answer and that answer is Israel.
by Great Algerstonia » Wed Dec 22, 2021 2:12 pm
Resilient Acceleration wrote:After a period of letting this discussion run its course without my involvement due to sheer laziness and a new related NS project, I have returned with an answer and that answer is Israel.
by Austria-Bohemia-Hungary » Wed Dec 22, 2021 2:16 pm
by Great Algerstonia » Wed Dec 22, 2021 2:17 pm
Resilient Acceleration wrote:After a period of letting this discussion run its course without my involvement due to sheer laziness and a new related NS project, I have returned with an answer and that answer is Israel.
by Godular » Wed Dec 22, 2021 2:18 pm
by The Black Forrest » Wed Dec 22, 2021 6:38 pm
by Fiorina-Fury 161 » Wed Dec 22, 2021 6:40 pm
by The Black Forrest » Wed Dec 22, 2021 6:42 pm
Fiorina-Fury 161 wrote:The death penalty is something that should only be used on horrible criminals. Not the innocent unborn.
by Godular » Wed Dec 22, 2021 7:24 pm
Fiorina-Fury 161 wrote:The death penalty is something that should only be used on horrible criminals. Not the innocent unborn.
by Austria-Bohemia-Hungary » Wed Dec 22, 2021 7:38 pm
by Great Algerstonia » Wed Dec 22, 2021 7:41 pm
Austria-Bohemia-Hungary wrote:If abortion is murder then I am committing genocide every time I scratch myself.
Resilient Acceleration wrote:After a period of letting this discussion run its course without my involvement due to sheer laziness and a new related NS project, I have returned with an answer and that answer is Israel.
by Genivaria » Wed Dec 22, 2021 7:47 pm
Godular wrote:Thepeopl wrote:Could you explain why you would advocate the deliberate demise of a formerly pregnant person if you oppose the deliberate demise of a clump of cells?
G.A. stated in another thread that they were mocking pro-life folks who champion the death penalty at the same time. It would have been nice if they'd been more obvious that they meant their post in jest, as the Abortion thread is not the best place to test Poe's Law.
by Vassenor » Thu Dec 23, 2021 1:52 am
Fiorina-Fury 161 wrote:The death penalty is something that should only be used on horrible criminals. Not the innocent unborn.
by Neutraligon » Thu Dec 23, 2021 2:33 am
Great Algerstonia wrote:Austria-Bohemia-Hungary wrote:If abortion is murder then I am committing genocide every time I scratch myself.
You are a maniac... oh wait... oh no... I'm a maniac too... FUCK WE'RE ALL MANIACS
by The Archregimancy » Fri Dec 24, 2021 2:19 am
Great Algerstonia wrote:All abortions should be punished with the death penalty
Great Algerstonia wrote:The New California Republic wrote:Oh so you are just being facetious and saying things in bad faith for no reason at all, even though it looks ridiculous, gotcha. Well, I don't really get it at all, because doing such a thing really is very very strange.
That is a very rude thing to assume and I think you are looking ridiculous not me
NCR= New California Ridiculousness
by The Alma Mater » Sun Dec 26, 2021 11:48 pm
by Page » Fri Dec 31, 2021 2:40 am
by Collective A » Fri Dec 31, 2021 2:51 am
by Ifreann » Fri Dec 31, 2021 6:15 am
Page wrote:Do other pro-choicers agree with me that abortion rather than birth should be the default when the one who is pregnant lacks the capacity to consent? For example, if a coma patient is raped, or a sverely intellectually disabled ward of the state, or a 10-year-old child. I find it fascinating and outrageous that birth is often still the default in these situations. It stands to reason that when consent is not possible, the option that has the lesser impact on one's body and lesser risk should be selected.
I mean honestly, when a judge rules "she doesn't have the capacity to consent, so she has to give birth" I see that as little different than "this woman is too drunk to decide whether or not she wants to have sex with this man, so she has to have sex with him."
by Kowani » Thu Jan 06, 2022 5:35 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Austria-Bohemia-Hungary, Bienenhalde, Burnt Calculators, Corporate Collective Salvation, Cyptopir, Dutch Socialist States, Glorious Freedonia, Google [Bot], Jerzylvania, Moneymoneystan, Paro Bow, Pridelantic people, Roighelm, Romanic Imperium, Rusrunia, Tarsonis, The Jamesian Republic, Too Basedland, Tordek Redfist, Tungstan, Vanuzgard, X3-U, Zetaopalatopia, Zurkerx
Advertisement