[R] ignore spam

[-Astoria-]

Yes, but, your point is addressed directly. We do not know each other, no one here knows anyone else here, and if they imagine that they do, this is really sad and they need another social activity. All that is real here is the text on the screen, the dialogue itself. That is the only thing that is real for everyone involved. If you want fake friends, get social media.

St.Augustine would beg to differ.

Not an argument.

[Giovenith]

I tutted at him.

[-Astoria-]

I tutted at him.

Thank you!

*leaves an indeterminate number of seafood*

[Tsaivao]

LOL this is rich coming from a conspiracy theorist with no knowledge of evolution.

LOL this is rich coming from a heretic with no knowledge of scripture.

arguments detected: 0

More than anything, this thread so far makes a hard case that we need a licensing agency to issue permits to people to have opinions, or that our whole way of educating people has never trained them to use natural language in a way that only outputs formally true arguments.

Congrats, you have lost the ability to comment your opinions. How do you feel?

Me: *sees that Henry is driving a new car*

Me: "I see that Henry bought a new car, or, there are glow-in-the-dark flamencos in an underwater supertechnological Atlanis civilization underneath the North Pole, in the form of (X v Y) or, "X, or Y". This is justified true belief and a correct application of the disjunction introduction in elementary logic."

You: Congrats, you believe in glow-in-the-dark flamencos in the lost underwater Atlantean bubble civilization.

Gettier: No comment.

Either properly debate someone, or don't reply to them at all. This whole sarcastic "end of discussion because I say so next" act is too close to spam and flamebaiting.

I cannot properly debate someone, if they do not make an argument. I can only respond coherently to nonsense by saying "this is nonsense", or with nonsense.

Seems like they ain't slowin' down