Creeperopolis wrote:The League will not support the condemnations of raiders
Why?
Advertisement
by WayNeacTia » Sun Oct 31, 2021 2:50 pm
Creeperopolis wrote:The League will not support the condemnations of raiders
RiderSyl wrote:You'd really think that defenders would communicate with each other about this. I know they're not a hivemind, but at least some level of PR skill would keep Quebecshire and Quebecshire from publically contradicting eac
wait
by Creeperopolis » Sun Oct 31, 2021 2:58 pm
by WayNeacTia » Sun Oct 31, 2021 3:32 pm
RiderSyl wrote:You'd really think that defenders would communicate with each other about this. I know they're not a hivemind, but at least some level of PR skill would keep Quebecshire and Quebecshire from publically contradicting eac
wait
by Quebecshire » Sun Oct 31, 2021 3:42 pm
Benevolent Thomas wrote:I founded a defender organization out of my dislike of invaders, what invading represents, and my desire to see them suffer.
Pergamon wrote:I must say, you are truly what they deserve.
by WayNeacTia » Sun Oct 31, 2021 4:01 pm
Quebecshire wrote:Wayneactia wrote:"Black commendations" huh?
The reality of the game in 2021 is that most raider condemns are rather thinly veiled commendations, seeking to congratulate raiders for contributions to the world that are rather a net negative. If you properly read Delegate Creeperopolis' statement (which I doubt you did), you would understand that he avoided saying we would oppose all condemnations, as it is possible for some to be more genuine than the typical ones. The League's WAD serves to vote our goals in the WA, which primarily means voting for goals in line with our military - that being hardline defender and opposed to granting political capital to raiders. It is not a difficult concept.
Your typical nonsensical snark and whatever else means nothing. Thanks for the bumps.
RiderSyl wrote:You'd really think that defenders would communicate with each other about this. I know they're not a hivemind, but at least some level of PR skill would keep Quebecshire and Quebecshire from publically contradicting eac
wait
by Comfed » Sun Oct 31, 2021 4:28 pm
Wayneactia wrote:Quebecshire wrote:The reality of the game in 2021 is that most raider condemns are rather thinly veiled commendations, seeking to congratulate raiders for contributions to the world that are rather a net negative. If you properly read Delegate Creeperopolis' statement (which I doubt you did), you would understand that he avoided saying we would oppose all condemnations, as it is possible for some to be more genuine than the typical ones. The League's WAD serves to vote our goals in the WA, which primarily means voting for goals in line with our military - that being hardline defender and opposed to granting political capital to raiders. It is not a difficult concept.
Your typical nonsensical snark and whatever else means nothing. Thanks for the bumps.
Well I am sure his 46 whole votes will make or break any raider condemnation...... Also, your moralism is showing. You may want to cover that up.
by Quebecshire » Sun Oct 31, 2021 5:54 pm
Wayneactia wrote:Also, your moralism is showing.
Benevolent Thomas wrote:I founded a defender organization out of my dislike of invaders, what invading represents, and my desire to see them suffer.
Pergamon wrote:I must say, you are truly what they deserve.
by Andusre » Sun Oct 31, 2021 6:14 pm
HumanSanity — Today at 18:15
Yes you are a petty asshole lol
[RRA] Minskiev — Today at 03:57
I mean I'm sure Onder is a good enough actor to pull off gay zoomer scotsman
by WayNeacTia » Sun Oct 31, 2021 6:20 pm
RiderSyl wrote:You'd really think that defenders would communicate with each other about this. I know they're not a hivemind, but at least some level of PR skill would keep Quebecshire and Quebecshire from publically contradicting eac
wait
by Quebecshire » Mon Nov 01, 2021 9:54 pm
Benevolent Thomas wrote:I founded a defender organization out of my dislike of invaders, what invading represents, and my desire to see them suffer.
Pergamon wrote:I must say, you are truly what they deserve.
by Apatosaurus » Mon Nov 01, 2021 9:56 pm
by Altmoras » Mon Nov 01, 2021 9:58 pm
by South Asians » Mon Nov 01, 2021 10:06 pm
by Creeperopolis » Mon Nov 01, 2021 11:01 pm
by Varanius » Tue Nov 02, 2021 6:25 am
Wow it’s almost likeAltmoras wrote:I'd say I'm disappointed that NS' "most feared military" and its largest region weren't able to get a single ban between them on a 13 second trigger, but that would require me to be surprised. Congrats on the successful training op to LDF, FNDA, Alvarez, SPSF, and Thaecia.
Angeloid Astraea wrote:I can't think of anyone that creates controversy out of nothing better than you!
Excidium Planetis wrote:Yeah, if you could enlighten me as to why you're such an asshole, that would be great.
Koth wrote:Vara is such a dedicated hater, it's impressive
Mlakhavia wrote:Vara isn't a gameplay personality, he's a concentrated ball of spite
by Krovx Indochina » Tue Nov 02, 2021 7:48 am
by Apatosaurus » Tue Nov 02, 2021 10:59 am
Varanius wrote:Wow it’s almost likeAltmoras wrote:I'd say I'm disappointed that NS' "most feared military" and its largest region weren't able to get a single ban between them on a 13 second trigger, but that would require me to be surprised. Congrats on the successful training op to LDF, FNDA, Alvarez, SPSF, and Thaecia.
- It wasn’t TBH’s op.
by Varanius » Tue Nov 02, 2021 12:27 pm
It seems to be you who fails to understand. As I said, it wasn’t TBH’s op. Their very inclusion in the jab is silly. Speaking of jabs, you may want to look through yours a few times before hitting “send”. This one was lackluster to say the least.
Angeloid Astraea wrote:I can't think of anyone that creates controversy out of nothing better than you!
Excidium Planetis wrote:Yeah, if you could enlighten me as to why you're such an asshole, that would be great.
Koth wrote:Vara is such a dedicated hater, it's impressive
Mlakhavia wrote:Vara isn't a gameplay personality, he's a concentrated ball of spite
by Thousand Branches » Tue Nov 02, 2021 1:14 pm
Varanius wrote:It seems to be you who fails to understand. As I said, it wasn’t TBH’s op. Their very inclusion in the jab is silly. Speaking of jabs, you may want to look through yours a few times before hitting “send”. This one was lackluster to say the least.Apatosaurus wrote:What part of "I'd say I'm disappointed that NS' "most feared military" and its largest region weren't able to get a single ban between them on a 13 second trigger" do you not understand
by Quebecshire » Tue Nov 02, 2021 1:20 pm
Varanius wrote:Wow it’s almost likeAltmoras wrote:I'd say I'm disappointed that NS' "most feared military" and its largest region weren't able to get a single ban between them on a 13 second trigger, but that would require me to be surprised. Congrats on the successful training op to LDF, FNDA, Alvarez, SPSF, and Thaecia.
- The raiders didn’t care about warzones
- No defenders had touched it for 4 days (presumably because they also don’t care about warzones for anything other than gloat points) and
- It wasn’t TBH’s op.
Given that neither raiders nor defenders seem to at all really care about the warzone, why are we here again?
Krovx Indochina wrote:Thank you for the liberation, WZEU appreciates it very much.
Benevolent Thomas wrote:I founded a defender organization out of my dislike of invaders, what invading represents, and my desire to see them suffer.
Pergamon wrote:I must say, you are truly what they deserve.
by Apatosaurus » Tue Nov 02, 2021 1:24 pm
Varanius wrote:It seems to be you who fails to understand. As I said, it wasn’t TBH’s op. Their very inclusion in the jab is silly. Speaking of jabs, you may want to look through yours a few times before hitting “send”. This one was lackluster to say the least.Apatosaurus wrote:What part of "I'd say I'm disappointed that NS' "most feared military" and its largest region weren't able to get a single ban between them on a 13 second trigger" do you not understand :P
by Varanius » Tue Nov 02, 2021 1:52 pm
Thanks!Quebecshire wrote:lVara, you're a smart guy
….and still didn’t lead the op? You seem to be missing the fundamental point that it was not their operation they lost, pointing them out just makes you look petty, and as in need of a cheap victory as you do clearly are.it clearly says, as Apatosaurus pointed out "and its largest region", which notes TNP, the operation leader. TBH was not the primary organization but it was involved and Mira decided to gloat.
Because it was fun? And also, quite evidently, not enough to active try and keep it. Taking a region isn’t some hard accomplishment. Especially one defenders so obviously don’t care about.The raiders clearly cared enough to raid it and sit there, so hush.
I’m simply setting the record straight, honest discussion is my highest priority ^-^Another pro-tip: the more you scream that you don't care about something the more it looks like you care about it. We know you care about it
Yes. And this time (as I’m sure you can piece together given the amount of times I’ve said this is TNP’s op) I didn’t organize this, and I didn’t plan it.since you also attempted to raid Warzone Europe months ago,
and as you know, it failed due to poor planning/scheduling on your part and then a tactical mistake at update.
It would seem through sheer observation, that you’re here to do little more than boast about what Andy has already admitted was a training liberation (one where at least 3 people missed the 13 second trigger), and give yourselves awards for…organizing said training lib? I’m not mad, just disappointed.To answer why we are here - well, I was here to report a successful multilateral operation with treaty allies, embassy partners, and other friends alike. Not sure about you.
Angeloid Astraea wrote:I can't think of anyone that creates controversy out of nothing better than you!
Excidium Planetis wrote:Yeah, if you could enlighten me as to why you're such an asshole, that would be great.
Koth wrote:Vara is such a dedicated hater, it's impressive
Mlakhavia wrote:Vara isn't a gameplay personality, he's a concentrated ball of spite
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: FREESPEECH REPUBLIC OF GEARCOLY
Advertisement