Partly. I don't know if that part is
Advertisement

by Australian rePublic » Mon Jul 05, 2021 1:46 am

by Amorosa-Coonarra Coasts » Mon Jul 05, 2021 2:02 am

by Australian rePublic » Mon Jul 05, 2021 3:55 am

by Amorosa-Coonarra Coasts » Mon Jul 05, 2021 4:21 am

by Australian rePublic » Mon Jul 05, 2021 6:08 am

by Amorosa-Coonarra Coasts » Mon Jul 05, 2021 8:17 am
Australian rePublic wrote:Amorosa-Coonarra Coasts wrote:
Oh. How so?
I don't know whether or not this ended up happening, but the royal commission suggested that customers, rather than banks, pay the commissions owed to mortgage brokers. The banks could easily afford the comission, but most customers would be unwilling to pay it. Most mortgage brokers are small mom & pop businesses who don't need that shit. My mum teaches mortgage broking and she told me that that was the worst thing that could possibly happen to the industry. Considering how banks have screwed people over badly, I don't think they should be exempt from paying mortgage brokers' comissions

by Australian rePublic » Mon Jul 05, 2021 6:25 pm
Amorosa-Coonarra Coasts wrote:Australian rePublic wrote:I don't know whether or not this ended up happening, but the royal commission suggested that customers, rather than banks, pay the commissions owed to mortgage brokers. The banks could easily afford the comission, but most customers would be unwilling to pay it. Most mortgage brokers are small mom & pop businesses who don't need that shit. My mum teaches mortgage broking and she told me that that was the worst thing that could possibly happen to the industry. Considering how banks have screwed people over badly, I don't think they should be exempt from paying mortgage brokers' comissions
"But don't worry, the big banks won't fail because they're not supposed to."
- Bill Wurtz
So avoid the big banks if you can? Stick with Bendigo or Suncorp? Or a credit union/building society?

by Amorosa-Coonarra Coasts » Mon Jul 05, 2021 7:43 pm
Australian rePublic wrote:Amorosa-Coonarra Coasts wrote:
"But don't worry, the big banks won't fail because they're not supposed to."
- Bill Wurtz
So avoid the big banks if you can? Stick with Bendigo or Suncorp? Or a credit union/building society?
Under the proposal, they wouldn't have been obligated to pay commissions to mortage brokers either

by Australian rePublic » Mon Jul 05, 2021 8:08 pm
Amorosa-Coonarra Coasts wrote:Australian rePublic wrote:Under the proposal, they wouldn't have been obligated to pay commissions to mortage brokers either
I know that. There are small mom-and-pop banks out there though. I'm pretty sure Gympie CU would be one. VOLT and :86400 (neobanks) would have been made up of a relatively small team. And then there's small ADIs like the Illy-W Credit Union and Orange Credit Union. Either they're already owned by a medium to big-sized bank, such as bcu (Bananacoast Community Credit Union) which is currently owned by the P&N (Police and Nurses) Bank. Manly-Warringah and Northern Beaches CUs are owned by Community 1st.
Westpac owns St George Bank, Bank SA and the Bank of Melbourne - three subsidiaries in total.
CBA owns Bankwest and Aussie Home-Loans.
NAB owns MLC, UBank, :86 400 and the Bank of NZ.
BOQ owns ME Bank.
Bendigo + Adelaide Bank (or BAAB, as I like to call it), owns AWA, BDCU and Circle Alliance Banks.
Police Bank owns Border Bank, which I'm surprised isn't located in Albury.
Bank of Sydney is owned by the foreign Arab Bank, if I'm not mistaken.
My point is, while I do hold concern for small businesses, I hold much more concern for the power these big four banks have, and with loose banking acquisition laws.
I mean, having all these other banks, credit unions and building societies is mad, but they can't really hold a torch to the Big 4 and their inner circle of two shady operators; Macquarie and AMP, who according to Market Forces, have at least $3 billion of their investment subsidiary sunk into climate-wrecking projects. Bank of Queensland is up there too.
Right now, only really Bendigo and Suncorp can hold a candle to the Big Four and Slightly-Less-Big Three. Heritage, Newcastle Permanent and CUA (Great Sth. Bank) do quite well in the mutual banking sector.
I guess it's just Australians enjoy a sense of familiarity.

by Australian rePublic » Mon Jul 05, 2021 8:59 pm

by Amorosa-Coonarra Coasts » Mon Jul 05, 2021 9:51 pm
Australian rePublic wrote:Shit, today is the only time I've edited the OP since last creating this thread SeptemberI almost feel bad for ruining the no-edits strake (is that how you spell streeke?) Anyways...
Anyways, one thing that really gets me is the lack of phone coverage in this country. Given how remote we are, reception everywhere is impossible, never gonna happen. Telstra has got a pretty good network, but their customer service is absolutely abysmal at best. AT BEST. It's as if they pride themselves on shit customer service There are some parts of the country where Telstra is your only option, which is bad for competition. Optus is pretty good for where many people want to go, but there are patchy areas in places that get my goat. For example, in the more remote parts of Sydney, e.g. Wisemans Ferry, reception is pathchy to non-existent. In Old Adaminaby and Providence Portal, two towns which are extremely popular amongst winter tourists due to their proximity to the ski resorts, especially Selwyn, and there's an entire 6 hour section and three entire stations on the Sydney to Broken Hill rail line with no Optus reception whatsoever, which is abysmal. The other carriers don't even compare to Telstra and Optus. There should be places which should have minimum expectation of basic phone reception, such as tourist resorts, (i.e. resort towns) including seasonal resorts, and passenger rail corridors. Singtel, Optus' parent company and 100% owner, is excellent in Singapore, where it's the country's largest carrier. To be fair though, maybe we shouldn't compare Australia's population density to that of Singapore.

by Australian rePublic » Mon Jul 05, 2021 9:56 pm
Amorosa-Coonarra Coasts wrote:Australian rePublic wrote:Shit, today is the only time I've edited the OP since last creating this thread SeptemberI almost feel bad for ruining the no-edits strake (is that how you spell streeke?) Anyways...
Anyways, one thing that really gets me is the lack of phone coverage in this country. Given how remote we are, reception everywhere is impossible, never gonna happen. Telstra has got a pretty good network, but their customer service is absolutely abysmal at best. AT BEST. It's as if they pride themselves on shit customer service There are some parts of the country where Telstra is your only option, which is bad for competition. Optus is pretty good for where many people want to go, but there are patchy areas in places that get my goat. For example, in the more remote parts of Sydney, e.g. Wisemans Ferry, reception is pathchy to non-existent. In Old Adaminaby and Providence Portal, two towns which are extremely popular amongst winter tourists due to their proximity to the ski resorts, especially Selwyn, and there's an entire 6 hour section and three entire stations on the Sydney to Broken Hill rail line with no Optus reception whatsoever, which is abysmal. The other carriers don't even compare to Telstra and Optus. There should be places which should have minimum expectation of basic phone reception, such as tourist resorts, (i.e. resort towns) including seasonal resorts, and passenger rail corridors. Singtel, Optus' parent company and 100% owner, is excellent in Singapore, where it's the country's largest carrier. To be fair though, maybe we shouldn't compare Australia's population density to that of Singapore.
The National Broadband Network isn't much better than our telephone network. For fixed broadband, 43.40mbps on average according to Ookla Speedtest, meaning Australia is 56th in the world on fixed broadband speeds - somehow Moldova and Trinidad-Tobago are beating us on fixed internet speed.

by Amorosa-Coonarra Coasts » Mon Jul 05, 2021 10:21 pm

by Australian rePublic » Mon Jul 05, 2021 10:52 pm
Amorosa-Coonarra Coasts wrote:Ok.
Anyway, um, I don't think I've covered this yet, but recently, big media players have been pushing to cut local content quotas - and it has apparently worked.
Rundown: [url]https://www.michaelwest.com.au/local-arts-and-film-jilted-in-favour-of-foreign-streaming-majors-foxtel-netflix-and-nines-stan/
/url]
This decreases incentive for local content to be produced, and further bleeds Screen Australia of funding. I mean, I watch SMG4 - and Meta Runner was amazing - but I rarely ever hear of anything else. Netflix, a foreign giant, is picking up aspiring Australian filmmakers - which is fine - but, as with Google and Activision - operates in tax havens and is able to get away with paying no tax on royalties. Without local content guidelines, some of the ABC's programs (which are indeed of middling quality) may disappear. There is no longer an incentive for Foxtel to produce local content.
Meanwhile, the video-on-demand giants like Disney, ViacomCBS - who owns Channel 10 - and Nine (who owns Stan), are netting profits into the billions while paying a minute amount of tax.
Meanwhile, Foxtel gets $40 million to televise women's sport - with the paperwork mysteriously unavailable.
Why?

by Amorosa-Coonarra Coasts » Tue Jul 06, 2021 8:34 am

by Tinni » Tue Jul 06, 2021 8:49 am

by Australian rePublic » Tue Jul 06, 2021 6:58 pm
Amorosa-Coonarra Coasts wrote:Opinion: As a Google Maps addict,
I have been through (parts of) Sydney, and I just have to say, Katoomba feels like it's 30 kilometres away.

by Amorosa-Coonarra Coasts » Tue Jul 06, 2021 9:30 pm

by Australian rePublic » Tue Jul 06, 2021 10:13 pm
Amorosa-Coonarra Coasts wrote:This looks like a cause for concern.
https://www.michaelwest.com.au/how-super-are-the-super-changes-and-who-do-they-benefit/Michael%20West%20Media%20on%20the%20recent%20superannuation%20amendments
https://superblog.netlify.app/2021/03/25/funds-failing-test/?utm_source=twitter&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=fundsfailingtest/Choice's%20point%20of%20view%20on%20YFYS
I thought the liberals believed in the free market.
Sure, it might be of some short-term benefit, but I'm worried about the super industry being consolidated into the hands of places like AMP - the big 4 are running scared from superannuation.
Superannuation rates have been frozen for years, while politicians enjoy 15.4%.
Given the IR reforms of last year, the closure of JobSeeker and JobKeeper - both set up in such a way that it allowed businesses like Harvey Norman to keep millions of dollars and not pay it back - the cashless welfare card that's been enforced in trial areas, quarantining 80% of welfare recipients' money under the pretense of 'stopping spending on alcohol and drugs', and planned to be rolled out to Centrelink recipients nationally, the tax cuts given to the top 10%, all while energy companies get away with exporting our cheap resources for their own benefit.

by Amorosa-Coonarra Coasts » Tue Jul 06, 2021 10:52 pm
Australian rePublic wrote:The top link at working. It does seem concerning. It seems like a band-aid solution

by Australian rePublic » Wed Jul 07, 2021 12:53 am

by Australian rePublic » Wed Jul 07, 2021 12:56 am

by Amorosa-Coonarra Coasts » Wed Jul 07, 2021 1:21 am

by Amorosa-Coonarra Coasts » Wed Jul 07, 2021 1:23 am

by Australian rePublic » Wed Jul 07, 2021 1:58 am
Amorosa-Coonarra Coasts wrote:https://www.abc.net.au/news/2021-07-07/nsw-delta-variant-may-never-be-controlled/100273956
What the hell is this bullshit?!
*RAGE OFFSCREEN*
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Elejamie, Fartsniffage, Fractalnavel, Great Britain-and Northern Ireland, Greater Britannian Realm, Hergovnia, Ifreann, Langnord, Mercov, Perishna, Saarland-Westpalia, Sanana, The Archregimancy, The Notorious Mad Jack, Vassenor, Zantalio
Advertisement