Azalfia wrote:(Copy pasted some sources from one of my special super secret source docs; sorry if it comes off a bit choppy.)
>https://sci-hub.do/10.1146/annurev-soc-071913-043309
Enormous meta-analysis of 90 cross-sectional studies analyzing relationship between diversity & social cohesion.
Vast majority of studies on the subject fail to prove the relationship between two variables.
In fact, study finds positive relationship between inter-ethnic contact & trust in ethnically heterogeneous communities.
Only contrary data shows small-scale (intra-neighborhood) trust suffers with ethnic heterogeneity in some circumstances, and even then only in America.
Plurality of data does not support - and largely contradicts - assertion that diversity hurts social cohesion.
Sociology, what a joke. All western European countries right now are struggling to figure out what they can do about the skyrocketing increase of ethnic ghettos in their cities. These ghettos are the result of "birds flocking together" because that's what humans naturally do. They are the focal points of the most crime in every western country because they are home to people originally from savage cultures where savagery is totally normal and part of everyday life. Why is it that it is acceptable for every single non-western nation to demand immigrants integrate or even follow the major religion yet western nations must accept the whole world without demanding anything at all? Isn't it strange? Do the people who write such tripe not believe in democracy? If they did, then they wouldn't be churning out such anti-democratic garbage that goes against the daily experiences of regular people who can no longer even leave their homes without locking everything up and turning on the security system in fear of some Ali or Muhammad breaking in and taking everything that isn't bolted to the ground. But then again, to these people that's a result of "racism", right? That's because the host nation didn't give enough free shit to these people (which is never enough of course) and we must do even more to accommodate them. Then again, as most of the slime who come up with this trash have never even had regular jobs so perhaps they cannot understand what it is to pay enormous taxes that go to supporting these parasites while the country continues to collapse.
What can account for the remarkable distinction between the United States on the one hand and other (Western) countries—including neighboring Canada—on the other? In the United States, the public reacts most negatively to diversity. Although the United States is a traditional immigration country,no similar consistent link is observed in other traditional countries of immigration such as Australia, Canada, and New Zealand (cf.Hagendoorn 2009). Thus, we have little reason to expect that recent migration countries, such as those in Europe, will necessarily experience a similar setback in social cohesion at some point in the future.
This is ludicrous. All you have to do is actually live in any of these countries and see with your own eyes, speak with actual residents. In Australia, New Zealand and every single European country, the common view of actual working people (not insular tertiary students or academics who live in their own little bubbles) is that so-called "diversity" is a problem that needs to be solved. If you've lived in any other country in a regular neighbourhood for a significant amount of time, you'd know this. Even saviour of the sand people Merkel has admitted how bad multiculti has been for Germany. There is simply no escaping this. Your academics cannot fight against reality.
Azalfia wrote:>https://scholar.harvard.edu/files/laibson/files/measuring_trust.pdf
Study which tested around 200 students in a trust based experiment and compared results from diverse groups and homogenous groups.
Finds no statistically significant negative relationship between diversity and social cohesion.
So students who have not had any real experience in the world are a good indicator of the success of multiculti? Why not survey actual working people who live and work among the 3rd world imports instead of such a selective sample? Or even the families of people whose children were groomed, raped and murdered by people who come from cultures where rape and honour killings are completely normal? Couldn't ever do that, could you? It would go against the narrative that you and your ilk are trying to push in order to destroy everything that has been achieved by the West. You people just seethe at the fact that average people do not want this for their countries. The tide is turning and people are increasingly voting for those who say "no more". Then again, in your fantasy kookooland, the increasing masses of people who vote against furthering this death cult are just too stupid to understand "the studies" and are infected with mind viruses, incapable of accepting "the science".
Azalfia wrote:>https://psycnet.apa.org/buy/2018-13651-001
Study examining a range of experiments meant to gauge the relationship between diversity and social cohesion.
Study finds all of the experiments found a positive relationship between diversity and social cohesion.
Proposed mechanism is that diversity causes people to identify more broadly with humanity, increasing sociability.
Can't even read it without paying. Did you? Or did you just type in your argument into a websearch along with "journal" or "studies" and then paste the articles without having read them? If not, then could you actually copy+paste the actual article? Also:
By Nai, Jared,Narayanan, Jayanth,Hernandez, Ivan,Savani, Krishna
Totally unbiased bunch of people. Regardless, if you've studied at university, you will very well know that a thesis proposal examining the damaging impacts of multiculturalism on social cohesion and identity will get you a one way ticket to the faculty office for a "discussion". Universities (at least humanities faculties) have long since been hijacked by certain interests who do not care about the lives of regular blue collar people except to demonise them as ignorant fools. For people who speak against hierarchy/class society, you people surely love looking down on others, don't you?