by Tarsonis » Wed Jun 02, 2021 3:48 pm
by North Washington Republic » Wed Jun 02, 2021 3:56 pm
by Salus Maior » Wed Jun 02, 2021 3:57 pm
North Washington Republic wrote:Out of curiosity, can a Priest reject communion simply because they wish to receive communion in the hand? I understand the trad argument about the default being on the tongue but communion in the hand is also explicitly permitted by Rome, and how can a local Priest reject someone that insists on it?
by North Washington Republic » Wed Jun 02, 2021 4:08 pm
Salus Maior wrote:North Washington Republic wrote:Out of curiosity, can a Priest reject communion simply because they wish to receive communion in the hand? I understand the trad argument about the default being on the tongue but communion in the hand is also explicitly permitted by Rome, and how can a local Priest reject someone that insists on it?
I've heard of that happening before, but it's wrong.
by Tarsonis » Wed Jun 02, 2021 4:12 pm
by North Washington Republic » Wed Jun 02, 2021 4:15 pm
by Tarsonis » Wed Jun 02, 2021 4:16 pm
by Suriyanakhon » Wed Jun 02, 2021 4:19 pm
This same leader told a gathering that “The Conservative Resurgence is like the Civil War, except this time unlike the last one, the right side won.” I walked out of that gathering, as did one of you.
by Punished UMN » Wed Jun 02, 2021 4:29 pm
by Lady Victory » Wed Jun 02, 2021 5:08 pm
Punished UMN wrote:I leave for thirty minutes and you guys have a new thread smh
by Dylar » Wed Jun 02, 2021 5:18 pm
Salus Maior wrote:Apparently, the Vatican may have plans to place restrictions on the practice of the TLM.
I don't know anything about this news provider, and it would be welcome if this isn't actually something in the works. But this is just very concerning to me, of course, and it's frustrating that the Vatican really just doesn't know what young people want in religion. Traditional parishes are growing, every traditional parish I've been to has had lots of young people in it. If the Vatican restricts the growth of traditional liturgy it'll be a mistake, and it'll nip a lot of peoples' spiritual growth in the bud.
St. Albert the Great wrote:"Natural science does not consist in ratifying what others have said, but in seeking the causes of phenomena."
Franko Tildon wrote:Fire washes the skin off the bone and the sin off the soul. It cleans away the dirt. And my momma didn't raise herself no dirty boy.
by North Washington Republic » Wed Jun 02, 2021 5:25 pm
Dylar wrote:Salus Maior wrote:Apparently, the Vatican may have plans to place restrictions on the practice of the TLM.
I don't know anything about this news provider, and it would be welcome if this isn't actually something in the works. But this is just very concerning to me, of course, and it's frustrating that the Vatican really just doesn't know what young people want in religion. Traditional parishes are growing, every traditional parish I've been to has had lots of young people in it. If the Vatican restricts the growth of traditional liturgy it'll be a mistake, and it'll nip a lot of peoples' spiritual growth in the bud.
Carrying this over from the last thread. Is there any reason this is even being considered? Like, I understand it if someone doesn't like the Extraordinary Form, but imposing restrictions on it is downright petty and insulting to the members of the faithful and the clergy who wish to participate in the TLM over the Novus Ordo
by Salus Maior » Wed Jun 02, 2021 6:11 pm
Dylar wrote:Salus Maior wrote:Apparently, the Vatican may have plans to place restrictions on the practice of the TLM.
I don't know anything about this news provider, and it would be welcome if this isn't actually something in the works. But this is just very concerning to me, of course, and it's frustrating that the Vatican really just doesn't know what young people want in religion. Traditional parishes are growing, every traditional parish I've been to has had lots of young people in it. If the Vatican restricts the growth of traditional liturgy it'll be a mistake, and it'll nip a lot of peoples' spiritual growth in the bud.
Carrying this over from the last thread. Is there any reason this is even being considered? Like, I understand it if someone doesn't like the Extraordinary Form, but imposing restrictions on it is downright petty and insulting to the members of the faithful and the clergy who wish to participate in the TLM over the Novus Ordo
by Kowani » Wed Jun 02, 2021 6:12 pm
North Washington Republic wrote:Dylar wrote:Carrying this over from the last thread. Is there any reason this is even being considered? Like, I understand it if someone doesn't like the Extraordinary Form, but imposing restrictions on it is downright petty and insulting to the members of the faithful and the clergy who wish to participate in the TLM over the Novus Ordo
Considering that this is coming from the Remnant, I’m skeptical of this report.
"The Barons of England demanded the Security of Law for Themselves, the Patriots of America proclaimed the Security and Protection for All. All men are equal before the Law. No matter upon what spot of the Earth's surface they were born; no matter whether an Asiatic or African, a European or an American Sun first burned upon them; no matter whether citizens or strangers, no matter whether rich or poor, no matter whether wise or simple, no matter whether strong or weak, this new Magna Carta to Mankind declares the rights of All to Life and Liberty and Property are Equal Before the Law."
~Rep. John Bingham (R-OH)
by Salus Maior » Wed Jun 02, 2021 6:13 pm
Kowani wrote:North Washington Republic wrote:
Considering that this is coming from the Remnant, I’m skeptical of this report.
indeed
i've found stories about him restricting it within St. Peter’s Basilica itself, but the Remnant is the only one I could find that had picked up the story about the church at large
by Lord Dominator » Wed Jun 02, 2021 6:26 pm
by Salus Maior » Wed Jun 02, 2021 6:34 pm
Lord Dominator wrote:Ooh, first page.
In the spirit of the convo, is anyone willing to explain the TLM to me - I suppose I could look it up on Wikipedia, but that’d be boring
by Kowani » Wed Jun 02, 2021 6:35 pm
Salus Maior wrote:Kowani wrote:indeed
i've found stories about him restricting it within St. Peter’s Basilica itself, but the Remnant is the only one I could find that had picked up the story about the church at large
Which I also think is petty. But I digress.
"The Barons of England demanded the Security of Law for Themselves, the Patriots of America proclaimed the Security and Protection for All. All men are equal before the Law. No matter upon what spot of the Earth's surface they were born; no matter whether an Asiatic or African, a European or an American Sun first burned upon them; no matter whether citizens or strangers, no matter whether rich or poor, no matter whether wise or simple, no matter whether strong or weak, this new Magna Carta to Mankind declares the rights of All to Life and Liberty and Property are Equal Before the Law."
~Rep. John Bingham (R-OH)
by Australian rePublic » Wed Jun 02, 2021 6:44 pm
by Autumn Wind » Wed Jun 02, 2021 6:59 pm
Kowani wrote:so i'm gonna say...with relative certainty...this never happened, and someone's playing the propaganda game for political purposes
by Salus Maior » Wed Jun 02, 2021 7:10 pm
Australian rePublic wrote:If I wanted to comission the construction of a church (the physical building), how would I go about doing so?
by Lord Dominator » Wed Jun 02, 2021 7:27 pm
by Tarsonis » Wed Jun 02, 2021 7:39 pm
by North Washington Republic » Wed Jun 02, 2021 7:51 pm
by Vendellamoore » Wed Jun 02, 2021 7:56 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: American Legionaries, Eahland, Ethel mermania, Fractalnavel, Free Algerstonia, Istastioner, Khurkhogur, Meadowfields, New haven america, Prima Scriptura, Red Lake Circle, Roylaii, Senkaku, Spirit of Hope, Stellar Colonies, The Front Range, The House of Hamid, The Jamesian Republic, The Tusken Clans, The Two Jerseys, Untecna, Washington Resistance Army
Advertisement