Advertisement
by Crazy girl » Fri Apr 02, 2021 1:41 am
by Tsaivao » Mon Apr 05, 2021 9:03 pm
Noting that the General Assembly has violated National Sovereignty with regards to human rights repeatedly and without remorse, the Security Council notes that:
1.) The General Assembly attempts to use ad hominem arguments in order to pass legislation (that is: arguments that attack a dissenter's character rather than arguments that attack a dissenter's facts and opinions);
2.) the General Assembly blatantly and willfully attempts to prevent member-nations from using the Death Penalty while also haphazardly arranging the respective resolutions in a manner that can be easily exploited by non-member nations;
3.) attempts to legislate directly _how member nations deal with conduct within their own militaries;_
4.) puts unequal gravitas on proposals "against" capital punishment compared to those "for" capital punishment.
The Security council hereby condemns the General Assembly.
OPERATION TEN-GO: Tsaivao Authority confirms wormhole drives based on alien designs are functional | Gen. Tsaosin: "Operational integrity is the key to our success against the xenic threat. In a week, we will have already infiltrated into their world." | All leaders of Tsaivao send personal farewells to Ten-Go special forces unit Tsaikantan-8
by Drew Durrnil » Tue Apr 13, 2021 10:54 am
Condemn Bananaistan
Category: Condemnation
Nominee: Bananaistan
Proposed by: Philipastan
ID: philipastan_1618333585
The World Assembly,
Noting that Bananaistan is a bitch,
Hereby:
1. Condemns Bananaistan
Rules broken: Refers to Bananaistan as a singular person (rule 2b), site rules (flaming)
Rosartemis wrote:DOWN WITH UEPU THOSE DAMNED RAIDERS!
by Outer Sparta » Fri Apr 16, 2021 8:20 am
The World Assembly Security Council,
Noting that the region of Chicken overlords contains thousands of puppet states,
Disappointed that the founder of the region uses many puppet states to keep their region on the top,
Worried that this will draw many new nations away from quality regions,
Noticing that the sheer number of nations slows the rotation of the planet, therefore, slowing all daily operations down,
Disgusted that the puppet governments do nothing but let their citizens issues go unnoticed,
Horrified that Chicken overlords are currently corrupting the world census reports,
Seeing that the satellite states of Chicken overlords have no creativity in naming and that can be seen easily,
Feeling that this is the right thing to do,
We Hereby Condemn Chicken overlords
by Drew Durrnil » Sun Apr 18, 2021 11:56 am
Condemn United Engiresco
Noticing that United Engiresco is a dictatorship;
Hereby Condemns United Engiresco.
Rosartemis wrote:DOWN WITH UEPU THOSE DAMNED RAIDERS!
by Lenlyvit » Mon Apr 19, 2021 6:03 pm
Security Council Proposal
ID: goundirk_1618873136
Repeal: “Condemn Koem Kab”
A resolution to repeal previously passed legislation.
Category: Repeal
Resolution: SC#287
Proposed by: Goundirk
Security Council Resolution #287 “Condemn Koem Kab” shall be struck out and rendered null and void.
The Security Council,
ACKNOWLEDGING our previous resolution,
CONFUSED at the fact the previous resolution managed to pass despite what it meant for everyone else,
DISPLEASED at the double standard held and the lack of enforcement of this resolution upon any other nation,
ADMITTING that our punishment against the nation of Koem Kab was disproportionate to their actions,
TAKING the following steps to undo our mistakes:
1) Repealing the condemnation of the nation of Koem Kab.
2) Revisiting our views upon art and how we should no longer hold this double standard against nations.
AWARE of the negative effects of hoarding artworks, intentional or otherwise,
REMINDING the world that they are allowed to do what they please with their owned artworks as long as it does not violate international law,
ASSURING the world that we will not continue to act against the ownership of art unless it is a severe threat that would require WA intervention.
FURTHERMORE reminding the earth that the nation of Koem Kab is not the sole reason for art inflation and therefore should not be punished for it,
MOVING ON from this and re-examining our policies on fair punishment against members of the WA,
Hereby repeals the condemnation of Koem Kab.
by Tinhampton » Tue Apr 27, 2021 10:08 am
SECURITY COUNCIL PROPOSAL
ID: cccp_2_0_1619542949
Condemn Big Boyz
A resolution to express shock and dismay at a nation or region.Category: CondemnationNominee (nation): Big BoyzProposed by: CCCP 2 0
It has appeared that nation called Big Boyz, has sunken into the darkest waters of repressive dictatorship.
Revealed: Big Boyz has one of the highest levels of corruption in the world, and the government does not send corrupt officials to court.
Brought to light, that nation has abolished the court system.
Reminded, that both civil rights, and political freedoms are outlawed, including the right to protest, marriage, and freedom of religion.
Shuddering to recall, that people are NOT allowed to live until the old age, leave, or enter the country.
Astonished to find out, about the allowance of the child labor.
Disgusted to reveal, that sports, internet, computers, and aircraft are banned.
Shocked to discover, that government implemented, DNA, and compulsory organ harvesting!
Recalling, that corporal punishment is allowed in school.
Pointing out, that independent press, piercing, automobiles, and guns are banned!
Everything above condemns the Big Boyz.
by Wrapper » Tue Apr 27, 2021 10:26 am
Tinhampton wrote:Would it be a violation of Rule 1d to assert that a nation can be Condemned (or Commended) by the actions they have taken (i.e. "Everything above"), rather than by the World Assembly or its Security Council?
The Rules wrote:The action that a resolution does (Condemning, Commending, Liberating or Repealing) does not have to be attributed to any body - however, if it is, it must be attributed to an appropriate authority - ie. the World Assembly or The Security Council. A proposal cannot have "Sedgistan Hereby Condemns Jakker" as its operative clause.
by Sedgistan » Tue Apr 27, 2021 11:15 am
Seconds ago: Sedgistan: Illegal — Rule 1d - viewtopic.php?p=38597020#p38597020
by Comfed » Tue Apr 27, 2021 2:58 pm
by Big Boyz » Tue Apr 27, 2021 5:35 pm
Tinhampton wrote:SECURITY COUNCIL PROPOSAL
ID: cccp_2_0_1619542949
(Image)
Condemn Big Boyz
A resolution to express shock and dismay at a nation or region.Category: CondemnationNominee (nation): Big BoyzProposed by: CCCP 2 0
It has appeared that nation called Big Boyz, has sunken into the darkest waters of repressive dictatorship.
Revealed: Big Boyz has one of the highest levels of corruption in the world, and the government does not send corrupt officials to court.
Brought to light, that nation has abolished the court system.
Reminded, that both civil rights, and political freedoms are outlawed, including the right to protest, marriage, and freedom of religion.
Shuddering to recall, that people are NOT allowed to live until the old age, leave, or enter the country.
Astonished to find out, about the allowance of the child labor.
Disgusted to reveal, that sports, internet, computers, and aircraft are banned.
Shocked to discover, that government implemented, DNA, and compulsory organ harvesting!
Recalling, that corporal punishment is allowed in school.
Pointing out, that independent press, piercing, automobiles, and guns are banned!
Everything above condemns the Big Boyz.
Would it be a violation of Rule 1d to assert that a nation can be Condemned (or Commended) by the actions they have taken (i.e. "Everything above"), rather than by the World Assembly or its Security Council?
by Traden » Thu May 06, 2021 11:13 am
by Traden » Tue May 11, 2021 8:15 am
by Drew Durrnil » Wed May 26, 2021 11:38 am
Repeal: "Commend Deadeye Jack"
Proposed by: Sauquistan
ID: sauquistan_1622039989
Security Council Resolution #353 “Commend Deadeye Jack” shall be struck out and rendered null and void.
We have to repel this proposal since it is a threat to nations with expanded civil liberties and human rights, so we ask that it be deactivated, because otherwise nations will be affected by this proposal and their civil rights and political freedom will be will turn RED
Rosartemis wrote:DOWN WITH UEPU THOSE DAMNED RAIDERS!
by Bears Armed » Wed May 26, 2021 12:09 pm
Drew Durrnil wrote:Repeal: "Commend Deadeye Jack"
Proposed by: Sauquistan
ID: sauquistan_1622039989
Security Council Resolution #353 “Commend Deadeye Jack” shall be struck out and rendered null and void.
We have to repel this proposal since it is a threat to nations with expanded civil liberties and human rights, so we ask that it be deactivated, because otherwise nations will be affected by this proposal and their civil rights and political freedom will be will turn RED
Rule violated: Game mechanics
by Sedgistan » Wed May 26, 2021 12:22 pm
Bears Armed wrote:Drew Durrnil wrote:Repeal: "Commend Deadeye Jack"
Proposed by: Sauquistan
ID: sauquistan_1622039989
Security Council Resolution #353 “Commend Deadeye Jack” shall be struck out and rendered null and void.
We have to repel this proposal since it is a threat to nations with expanded civil liberties and human rights, so we ask that it be deactivated, because otherwise nations will be affected by this proposal and their civil rights and political freedom will be will turn RED
Rule violated: Game mechanics
Meta-gaming, actually.
by The Unified Missourtama States » Thu May 27, 2021 7:51 am
by Moonfungus » Thu May 27, 2021 8:00 am
The Unified Missourtama States wrote:https://www.nationstates.net/page=UN_view_proposal/id=sauquistan_1622039989
Has been incorrectly ruled illegal because of 1d, but it does have an operative clause, "Security Council Resolution #353 “Commend Deadeye Jack” shall be struck out and rendered null and void."
I understand it may be illegal under 2a or 4b, but needs to be reviewed.
by Outer Sparta » Thu May 27, 2021 8:28 am
The Unified Missourtama States wrote:https://www.nationstates.net/page=UN_view_proposal/id=sauquistan_1622039989
Has been incorrectly ruled illegal because of 1d, but it does have an operative clause, "Security Council Resolution #353 “Commend Deadeye Jack” shall be struck out and rendered null and void."
I understand it may be illegal under 2a or 4b, but needs to be reviewed.
by Bhang Bhang Duc » Thu May 27, 2021 10:38 am
Pierconium wrote:I see Funk as an opportunistic manipulator that utilises the means available to him to reach his goals. In other words, a nation after my own heart.
RiderSyl wrote:If an enchantress made it so one raid could bring about world peace, Unibot would ask raiders to just sign a petition instead.
Sedgistan wrote:The SC has just has a spate of really shitty ones recently from Northumbria, his Watermelon fanboy…..
by Outer Sparta » Sat May 29, 2021 3:02 pm
Commend Arminland
A resolution to recognize outstanding contribution by a nation or region.
Category: Commendation
Nominee: Arminland
Proposed by: Arminland
Commend me please yes commend me please yes please commend me commend meeeeeee
Advertisement
Advertisement