Minskiev wrote:no cap :flushed:
well said
Advertisement
by The United Peoples of Centrism » Thu Apr 08, 2021 2:24 pm
Minskiev wrote:no cap :flushed:
by Fhaengshia » Thu Apr 08, 2021 4:24 pm
Riemstagrad wrote:Let market value of a card evolve towards the highest bid on that card (IF the MV of the card > highest bid)
Ioavollr wrote:This one seems obvious, if I'm offering the card for .50 and there aren't any takers, it's clearly not worth 5.50
- Maximum MV should not surpass current highest ask/match price
Ioavollr wrote:Spot on, the lowest indeed. I agree that this could be used to manipulate, perhaps a time delay would help (a day on the market or something)
by Briteannia » Mon Apr 12, 2021 7:31 am
by Bawkie » Mon Apr 12, 2021 7:49 am
by 9003 » Mon Apr 12, 2021 8:06 am
by Toerana » Mon Apr 12, 2021 3:45 pm
by Coffin-Breathe » Tue Apr 13, 2021 12:05 pm
by Fauzjhia » Tue Apr 13, 2021 10:22 pm
Coffin-Breathe wrote:I´d say, removing the "artwork-badge" as well as the ranking for valuable collections (which, imo, is rather unfair, because it does not differentiate between "collections in paid space" and "collections simply accumulated without paying for sufficient storage space") would be a much easier and more practicable way, as imo the main, if not the only incentive for inflating cards is to climb up in ranking.
by Cerata » Mon Apr 19, 2021 8:29 am
Fauzjhia wrote:Coffin-Breathe wrote:I´d say, removing the "artwork-badge" as well as the ranking for valuable collections (which, imo, is rather unfair, because it does not differentiate between "collections in paid space" and "collections simply accumulated without paying for sufficient storage space") would be a much easier and more practicable way, as imo the main, if not the only incentive for inflating cards is to climb up in ranking.
I would certain support removing the artwork badge or restricting the card market.
Because right, the market is just manipulated by some players who PRINT the value of card, solely to boost their deck value. of the 50 highest value card, none are legendary, and nearly all of the cards have been inflated to ridiculous number by a single player trading between themselves.
by Coffin-Breathe » Mon Apr 19, 2021 11:26 am
Cerata wrote:Imagine if the values were set back to default every few days.... I can hear the inflaters screaming already.
by Fauxia » Tue Apr 20, 2021 8:36 am
by Ronodin » Tue May 04, 2021 4:43 pm
by Ronodin » Thu May 06, 2021 3:36 pm
Saarz wrote:If you think inflation is abusing the game design, why are pull events perfectly fine then? That's just heavy abuse of TCALS to pull legendaries that """deserve""" having high MV.
by Land Without Shrimp » Fri May 07, 2021 12:51 pm
by Fauzjhia » Fri May 07, 2021 10:23 pm
by Boris Cult » Fri May 07, 2021 10:26 pm
by Coffin-Breathe » Sat May 08, 2021 2:04 am
Fauzjhia wrote:and give us more capacity for deck, as the current capacity limits only serve as a detriment to those who do not engage in puppet farming.
by Fauzjhia » Sat May 08, 2021 8:25 am
Coffin-Breathe wrote:Fauzjhia wrote:and give us more capacity for deck, as the current capacity limits only serve as a detriment to those who do not engage in puppet farming.
Don´t you think, that "not paying" for sufficient storage space is already enough an abuse of the system ? If something is to change, than this flaw, which has lead to an incredible inequity between the "honest" players, which have to pay more and more for every expansion (and therefore paying fair and by the rules), and those overgreedy "farmers" and "hoarders", which not only store unimaginable ammounts of "farmed" cards (often without any intention to sell or trade) while ruining the whole game greatly, but also amass great ammounts of "bank money" because they don´t spend it on deck storage expansion (as intended by "the system").
And don´t go for "everyone could do the same", as this is far from being correct - not everyone has the time or the computing skills to abuse the (otherwise relatively very good balanced) system, or the will to do so.
But in one thing we are consistant with - the "card game" should not have any influence on the regular NS-game, so no "arts badge", "rankings" or other "benefits" for any nation.
by L Kuan Yew » Sat May 08, 2021 11:58 am
Coffin-Breathe wrote:Don´t you think, that "not paying" for sufficient storage space is already enough an abuse of the system ? If something is to change, than this flaw, which has lead to an incredible inequity between the "honest" players, which have to pay more and more for every expansion (and therefore paying fair and by the rules), and those overgreedy "farmers" and "hoarders", which not only store unimaginable ammounts of "farmed" cards (often without any intention to sell or trade) while ruining the whole game greatly, but also amass great ammounts of "bank money" because they don´t spend it on deck storage expansion (as intended by "the system").
Coffin-Breathe wrote:"the "card game" should not have any influence on the regular NS-game, so no "arts badge", "rankings" or other "benefits" for any nation."
by Riemstagrad » Sat May 08, 2021 2:40 pm
L Kuan Yew wrote:The solution is to level the playing field COMPLETELY with only 50 cards per account (which is the DEFAULT DECK CAPACITY FOR ALL PLAYERS), ZERO capacity to expand beyond, and a complete END to public displays of the toxic concept of COLLECTIONS. In concert, BAN SOLICITATION THREADS on this forum OFFERING and/or REQUESTING cards for collections. It encourages GRANDSTANDING that benefits the interests of a MICROSCOPIC subset of the NS Community.
by Coffin-Breathe » Sun May 09, 2021 1:14 am
L Kuan Yew wrote:...
by L Kuan Yew » Sun May 09, 2021 4:51 am
Coffin-Breathe wrote:"I´m afraid, you don´t really get it"
Coffin-Breathe wrote:"the "card subgame" is a game and meant to be fun (for everyone willing to participate); and so it would be, if not some (a relatively small group of players) people would abuse the existing system."
Coffin-Breathe wrote:"It rewards players for participating over long periods, as their nations get more cards over time (based on luck, but in the end, it´s a game), and allows collecting specific cards in growing storage space, as long as the expansions are payed for (in game money,called "bank money"), which is perfectly o.k., as long as the sub-game is played by the rules."
Coffin-Breathe wrote:"I´m playing the card sub-game almost from it´s beginning on (like a lot of other players), and I´ve payed for my storage space of recently 800 cards without creating storage or bankrolling puppets - that´s a privilege that comes with participating over a long time."
by Cereskia » Sun May 09, 2021 8:03 am
About my Nation:
Overview | History | Geography | Politics | Military |Economy | International
by Ronodin » Mon May 10, 2021 10:13 am
L Kuan Yew wrote:...
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement