Advertisement
by Mauka » Tue Dec 15, 2020 12:27 pm
by Praeceps » Tue Dec 15, 2020 12:50 pm
Mauka wrote:Right but logistically that doesn't make sense in the context of the SC. Like imagine a nation joining dropping a proposal and then leaving in the UN, or NATO. I think if anything the choice makes the SC more dynamic causing players to have to choose at least on a temporary basis. Does the SC in character note that WA membership is used in this way? If so cool! Then it seems completely reasonable, to allow this.
by Mauka » Tue Dec 15, 2020 1:00 pm
Praeceps wrote:Mauka wrote:Right but logistically that doesn't make sense in the context of the SC. Like imagine a nation joining dropping a proposal and then leaving in the UN, or NATO. I think if anything the choice makes the SC more dynamic causing players to have to choose at least on a temporary basis. Does the SC in character note that WA membership is used in this way? If so cool! Then it seems completely reasonable, to allow this.
Nah, not really. There's also not much of a SC IC and OOC divide like in the GA.
by Quintessence of Dust » Sun Dec 20, 2020 3:35 am
by Honeydewistania » Sun Dec 20, 2020 5:05 am
Quintessence of Dust wrote:Why can't there be a way to opt out? I do not want have to CTE this nation yet again, but it seems to be literally the only way of avoiding this thing.
Alger wrote:if you have egoquotes in your signature, touch grass
by Praeceps » Sun Dec 20, 2020 11:22 am
Quintessence of Dust wrote:Why can't there be a way to opt out? I do not want have to CTE this nation yet again, but it seems to be literally the only way of avoiding this thing.
by Quintessence of Dust » Sun Dec 20, 2020 2:31 pm
Praeceps wrote:Quintessence of Dust wrote:Why can't there be a way to opt out? I do not want have to CTE this nation yet again, but it seems to be literally the only way of avoiding this thing.
If you're referring to someone commending you or condemning you but you do not want the commendation or condemnation, it is usually seen as poor form to write one. I would suggest asking the individual interested to not write the resolution if that is the case.
by Comfed » Sun Dec 20, 2020 2:41 pm
R/D isn't opt-out. Nor is the SC. most parts of NSGP aren't opt-out.Quintessence of Dust wrote:Praeceps wrote:If you're referring to someone commending you or condemning you but you do not want the commendation or condemnation, it is usually seen as poor form to write one. I would suggest asking the individual interested to not write the resolution if that is the case.
I have. Many times. This latest one is at least the fifth time I have had to do so. But why should I have to go out of my way to express my non-interest? Every other part of the game is opt-in: roleplays, R/D, issues, forum posting, everything. Except the SC. Why can't there be a "do not commend" list? I can block someone from TGing me or block their forum account, but I have no actual power beyond hoping they agree to be amenable to stop them writing something that can affix a coded message to my own nation?
by Honeydewistania » Sun Dec 20, 2020 5:50 pm
Quintessence of Dust wrote:Praeceps wrote:If you're referring to someone commending you or condemning you but you do not want the commendation or condemnation, it is usually seen as poor form to write one. I would suggest asking the individual interested to not write the resolution if that is the case.
I have. Many times. This latest one is at least the fifth time I have had to do so. But why should I have to go out of my way to express my non-interest? Every other part of the game is opt-in: roleplays, R/D, issues, forum posting, everything. Except the SC. Why can't there be a "do not commend" list? I can block someone from TGing me or block their forum account, but I have no actual power beyond hoping they agree to be amenable to stop them writing something that can affix a coded message to my own nation?
Alger wrote:if you have egoquotes in your signature, touch grass
by All Hail Dilber » Tue Jan 26, 2021 8:59 am
by Bhang Bhang Duc » Tue Jan 26, 2021 9:19 am
Pierconium wrote:I see Funk as an opportunistic manipulator that utilises the means available to him to reach his goals. In other words, a nation after my own heart.
RiderSyl wrote:If an enchantress made it so one raid could bring about world peace, Unibot would ask raiders to just sign a petition instead.
Sedgistan wrote:The SC has just has a spate of really shitty ones recently from Northumbria, his Watermelon fanboy…..
by All Hail Dilber » Tue Jan 26, 2021 10:43 am
by Radicalania » Mon Feb 08, 2021 9:18 am
"Martyn, I thought you quit?
-Everyone, 2019, 2021, 2023
by Bhang Bhang Duc » Mon Feb 08, 2021 9:59 am
Radicalania wrote:Question: if parts of a resolution are not true (nor have been for at least 6 months), can it pass the SC? And if a resolution hits Quorum and already went to vote, what would be the procedure? (a comrade pointed out that at least 4 things on the current SCR are not true)
Pierconium wrote:I see Funk as an opportunistic manipulator that utilises the means available to him to reach his goals. In other words, a nation after my own heart.
RiderSyl wrote:If an enchantress made it so one raid could bring about world peace, Unibot would ask raiders to just sign a petition instead.
Sedgistan wrote:The SC has just has a spate of really shitty ones recently from Northumbria, his Watermelon fanboy…..
by Radicalania » Mon Feb 08, 2021 11:11 am
"Martyn, I thought you quit?
-Everyone, 2019, 2021, 2023
by Praeceps » Mon Feb 08, 2021 2:56 pm
Radicalania wrote:Cheers BBD,
Can SC Resolutions reference GA Resolutions as reasons for condemnation? I feel like doing so would strengthen my repeal attempt
Further can a SCR link to RMB posts
by Radicalania » Sun Feb 14, 2021 9:16 am
"Martyn, I thought you quit?
-Everyone, 2019, 2021, 2023
by Sorianora » Thu Mar 04, 2021 6:06 pm
by Praeceps » Thu Mar 04, 2021 7:13 pm
Sorianora wrote:Is it just me or does SC#2 look illegal?
https://www.nationstates.net/page=WA_pa ... /council=2
And if it is, can you repeal it for being illegal?
by Free Las Pinas » Thu Mar 04, 2021 7:14 pm
Sorianora wrote:Is it just me or does SC#2 look illegal?
https://www.nationstates.net/page=WA_pa ... /council=2
And if it is, can you repeal it for being illegal?
by Sedgistan » Fri Mar 05, 2021 1:17 am
by Daarwyrth » Fri Mar 05, 2021 7:46 am
Haremm wrote:Just a question, what do Commendations and Condemnations actually do?
by Eumaeus » Fri Mar 05, 2021 9:17 am
Haremm wrote:Just a question, what do Commendations and Condemnations actually do?
Raiding History | Security Council | Dear Natives | TWP Raid |
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement