Ostroeuropa wrote:Kowani wrote:That’s…not how oppression is categorized
It’s not a binary “you have it or you don’t” thing
That’s just not how it works
It's interesting that this approach only became adopted when women were no longer able to convincingly claim to be unilaterally oppressed.
Then all of a sudden, "It's complicated.".
I'm not inclined to accept that behavior.
It seems to me to just be more post-facto rationalization to avoid a conclusion that wouldn't allow us to continue gynocentrism in our society.
Yeah
It’s almost like the realization that the struggles of ethnic, religious and sexual minorities, to say nothing of class, interacted with gender and sex in their own nuanced ways required society to be able to accept the perspectives of all those marginalized groups and allowed them to contribute to the larger societal conversation
No, that couldn’t be a factor in the slightest
It’s just a feminist conspiracy drag down men
Cordel One wrote:Ostroeuropa wrote:Racial hate crimes?
Men are 72% of victims.
Religious hate crimes?
61% of victims.
Sexuality hate crimes?
80% of victims.
Other hate crimes?
63% of victims.
(Other -> Disability, language, occupation).
It's almost like there are many factors at play beyond hate crimes.Being poor worsens other forms of societal prejudice against you.
Being a racial minority worsens other forms of societal prejudice against you.
Being a sexual minority worsens other forms of societal prejudice against you.
Being a man worsens other forms of societal prejudice against you.
Being a woman or anything else also worsens societal prejudice in many ways.The rich are not oppressed.
White people are not oppressed.
Straight people are not oppressed.
Women are not oppressed.
yes, yes, yes, and NO.
We are all oppressed under capitalism:^)