by Strana Land » Thu Nov 26, 2020 3:55 pm
by Nooooooooooooooo » Thu Nov 26, 2020 4:01 pm
by Levy » Thu Nov 26, 2020 4:02 pm
by Strana Land » Thu Nov 26, 2020 4:04 pm
Nooooooooooooooo wrote:Would this be a feature for only mods to do? Or anyone?
by Free Ravensburg » Thu Nov 26, 2020 4:04 pm
INT:| Canada "Gives Up" on Hiding Aliens and UFOs/ NAT:| Ravenian Astronauts That Went on the EELOO Mission Report Seeing a Mass of "Squidlike Handlike Starships"
by Nooooooooooooooo » Thu Nov 26, 2020 4:06 pm
by Strana Land » Thu Nov 26, 2020 4:08 pm
Nooooooooooooooo wrote:This is confusing. What do you mean by [DIFFERENT_BLANK]? Would the nation name change? It would affect other dispatches, in which [BLANK] is mentioned.
by Strana Land » Thu Nov 26, 2020 4:13 pm
Levy wrote:Sounds interesting, I have some cringy old nations I’d love to disband. Would you make it so that the nation name becomes unreserved?
by Strana Land » Thu Nov 26, 2020 4:17 pm
Free Ravensburg wrote:I would like this idea, but only for using on only your (player's) nations.
by Nooooooooooooooo » Thu Nov 26, 2020 5:01 pm
Strana Land wrote:Nooooooooooooooo wrote:This is confusing. What do you mean by [DIFFERENT_BLANK]? Would the nation name change? It would affect other dispatches, in which [BLANK] is mentioned.
If you are a unitary state, you can change the country name, but you do not have to. It would affect changes in which [BLANK] is mentioned.
by Strana Land » Thu Nov 26, 2020 5:06 pm
Nooooooooooooooo wrote:Strana Land wrote:
If you are a unitary state, you can change the country name, but you do not have to. It would affect changes in which [BLANK] is mentioned.
Does it mean mentions surrounded by [nation] tags? Or every single mention? In my case, there would obviously some RMB posts that would be taken out of context by changing "Nooooooooooooooo!" to to "[something else]!" Also, with something so drastic as that, it would also mean that demonyms would have to be changed, as well as ones mentioned in factbooks, which would cause huge problems for lots of nations, especially me, because my demonym is "Noon."
by Nooooooooooooooo » Thu Nov 26, 2020 5:10 pm
Strana Land wrote:Nooooooooooooooo wrote:Does it mean mentions surrounded by [nation] tags? Or every single mention? In my case, there would obviously some RMB posts that would be taken out of context by changing "Nooooooooooooooo!" to to "[something else]!" Also, with something so drastic as that, it would also mean that demonyms would have to be changed, as well as ones mentioned in factbooks, which would cause huge problems for lots of nations, especially me, because my demonym is "Noon."
Only mentions in [nation] tags would be changed. Demonyms would have to be changed manually.
by Sodoran Alesia » Thu Nov 26, 2020 5:31 pm
by Strana Land » Thu Nov 26, 2020 5:35 pm
by Nooooooooooooooo » Thu Nov 26, 2020 5:39 pm
Strana Land wrote:Nooooooooooooooo wrote:Oh dear God, that would be such a nightmare. This might be easier to do if NS introduced a find+replace feature, however.
Would you consider Nooooooooooooooo a unitary state or colony? If not, you would not have to worry about that because disbanding a federation or confederation would do something different.
by Strana Land » Thu Nov 26, 2020 6:00 pm
Sodoran Alesia wrote:I don't really get the point of this idea. If you don't like what your nation has become then make a new one. It's as simple as logging out and hitting the new nation button. If you want to split it up into "regions" for roleplay, you make new nations that represent those regions. This proposal sounds very confusing and messy.
by Levy » Thu Nov 26, 2020 6:03 pm
Strana Land wrote:Sodoran Alesia wrote:I don't really get the point of this idea. If you don't like what your nation has become then make a new one. It's as simple as logging out and hitting the new nation button. If you want to split it up into "regions" for roleplay, you make new nations that represent those regions. This proposal sounds very confusing and messy.
Here are some situations in which it could be useful:
(1) If you do not like how your country turned out but you do not want to start from square one
(2) If you want more control over your country than a region would provide but less than a confederation
(3) If you would rather govern only a small part of a confederation but do not want to start from square one
by Sodoran Alesia » Thu Nov 26, 2020 6:11 pm
Strana Land wrote:Sodoran Alesia wrote:I don't really get the point of this idea. If you don't like what your nation has become then make a new one. It's as simple as logging out and hitting the new nation button. If you want to split it up into "regions" for roleplay, you make new nations that represent those regions. This proposal sounds very confusing and messy.
Here are some situations in which it could be useful:
(1) If you do not like how your country turned out but you do not want to start from square one
(2) If you want more control over your country than a region would provide but less than a confederation
(3) If you would rather govern only a small part of a confederation but do not want to start from square one
by Strana Land » Thu Nov 26, 2020 6:16 pm
Levy wrote:Strana Land wrote:
Here are some situations in which it could be useful:
(1) If you do not like how your country turned out but you do not want to start from square one
(2) If you want more control over your country than a region would provide but less than a confederation
(3) If you would rather govern only a small part of a confederation but do not want to start from square one
Would you be able to keep your countries population, factbooks, forum posts, etc?
by Strana Land » Thu Nov 26, 2020 6:33 pm
Sodoran Alesia wrote:Strana Land wrote:
Here are some situations in which it could be useful:
(1) If you do not like how your country turned out but you do not want to start from square one
If you're too lazy to make a new nation, then I don't know what to say, tons of people make new nations for roleplay purposes.(2) If you want more control over your country than a region would provide but less than a confederation
What do you mean by "control"? Reading the original post, it doesn't really elaborate on that and just says something about the people you control.(3) If you would rather govern only a small part of a confederation but do not want to start from square one
What does "governing a small part" mean? This proposal is very vague. Does it affect issues and how you get them?
Lastly, why should anyone support this? People roleplay in different ways, implementing it in one specific way that could affect your nation sounds a bit unfair and risky from the admins' standpoint.
Factbooks, dispatches, RMBs, and forum posts work fine for everyone else. I don't see any compelling reason as to why this is a good idea besides someone being too lazy to create new nations.
by Giovanniland » Thu Nov 26, 2020 6:36 pm
Strana Land wrote:Nooooooooooooooo wrote:This is confusing. What do you mean by [DIFFERENT_BLANK]? Would the nation name change? It would affect other dispatches, in which [BLANK] is mentioned.
If you are a unitary state, you can change the country name, but you do not have to. It would affect changes in which [BLANK] is mentioned.
by Gandoor » Thu Nov 26, 2020 7:31 pm
by Levy » Thu Nov 26, 2020 7:33 pm
Gandoor wrote:This seriously feels like a solution in search of a problem that literally doesn't exist.
by Gandoor » Thu Nov 26, 2020 7:43 pm
Strana Land wrote:"Governing a small part" does not really mean anything, but it will be reflected in one statistic: population. If you become a former confederation, you loose a portion of your population due to not governing a certain amount of people who would have been governed. For example, a confederacy with a population of 10G could disband, and the former confederacy (as which the player is roleplaying) would have a population of 1G; the other 9G people are no longer governed by the government as which the player is roleplaying. In a former confederation, you still roleplay as you would.
Strana Land wrote:If you are a confederation, you would keep factbooks and forum posts, but your population would be divided by a random number greater than 1.
by Frisbeeteria » Fri Nov 27, 2020 3:46 pm
Gandoor wrote:This seriously feels like a solution in search of a problem that literally doesn't exist.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Dimetrodon Empire
Advertisement