Advertisement
by Geneviev » Wed Nov 25, 2020 5:52 pm
by San Lumen » Wed Nov 25, 2020 6:43 pm
Geneviev wrote:If they're parents, they should be listed as parents. I don't think the Supreme Court will become involved in this, though.
by Outer Sparta » Wed Nov 25, 2020 8:54 pm
by San Lumen » Wed Nov 25, 2020 9:00 pm
by Outer Sparta » Wed Nov 25, 2020 9:02 pm
by Geneviev » Wed Nov 25, 2020 9:03 pm
San Lumen wrote:Geneviev wrote:Which is a good thing, too. Parents being parents is just the way it should be.
I agree. Roberts is also very concerned about the image and legitimacy of the court. I might not always agree with him but overall hes been an ok chief justice. Gorsuch's opinion in the LGBT employment case suggest he's not open to the idea of overturning LGBT adoption.
by San Lumen » Wed Nov 25, 2020 9:04 pm
Outer Sparta wrote:San Lumen wrote:I agree. Roberts is also very concerned about the image and legitimacy of the court. I might not always agree with him but overall hes been an ok chief justice.
Which may no longer be the case especially concerning extreme partisanship and corporate interests pushing on the court. Roberts could give less of a fuck about the legitimacy of the court and push the GOP partisan agenda whenever possible.
by San Lumen » Wed Nov 25, 2020 9:05 pm
Geneviev wrote:San Lumen wrote:I agree. Roberts is also very concerned about the image and legitimacy of the court. I might not always agree with him but overall hes been an ok chief justice. Gorsuch's opinion in the LGBT employment case suggest he's not open to the idea of overturning LGBT adoption.
Is this a case about adoption? I might have misunderstood it.
by Geneviev » Wed Nov 25, 2020 9:09 pm
San Lumen wrote:Geneviev wrote:Is this a case about adoption? I might have misunderstood it.
yes the case involves a lesbian couple who conceived via artificial insemination and the state does;t want them recognized as the parents. A lower court said they should be and now the outgoing AG is appealing to the Supreme Court.
by Outer Sparta » Wed Nov 25, 2020 9:09 pm
San Lumen wrote:Outer Sparta wrote:Which may no longer be the case especially concerning extreme partisanship and corporate interests pushing on the court. Roberts could give less of a fuck about the legitimacy of the court and push the GOP partisan agenda whenever possible.
I dont think so. I very much he wants to see a court seen as completely out of touch with the public and having no legitimacy. Oveturning LGBT adoption would do that.
by San Lumen » Wed Nov 25, 2020 9:12 pm
Geneviev wrote:San Lumen wrote:
yes the case involves a lesbian couple who conceived via artificial insemination and the state does;t want them recognized as the parents. A lower court said they should be and now the outgoing AG is appealing to the Supreme Court.
But then it wasn't adoption, was it? I don't know, I'm confused.
by Free Las Pinas » Wed Nov 25, 2020 9:16 pm
North American Imperial State wrote:San Lumen wrote:What makes it shocking? Indiana is a very conservative state. I would have thought this issue would be settled.
What? Why have you singled out my post and not these two eh?Anatoliyanskiy wrote:F#ck them. This is really disappointing, though not unexpected.Ethics Committee of the SCPF wrote:Absolutely disgusting
Geneviev wrote:San Lumen wrote:
yes the case involves a lesbian couple who conceived via artificial insemination and the state does;t want them recognized as the parents. A lower court said they should be and now the outgoing AG is appealing to the Supreme Court.
But then it wasn't adoption, was it? I don't know, I'm confused.
by San Lumen » Wed Nov 25, 2020 9:17 pm
Free Las Pinas wrote:North American Imperial State wrote:What? Why have you singled out my post and not these two eh?
Probably because only your post expressed shock.Geneviev wrote:But then it wasn't adoption, was it? I don't know, I'm confused.
From what I understand, the legal father is the sperm donor, so they recognize him as the father.
Disappointing, if I'm understanding correctly.
by San Lumen » Wed Nov 25, 2020 9:20 pm
by Greed and Death » Wed Nov 25, 2020 9:38 pm
by San Lumen » Wed Nov 25, 2020 9:44 pm
Greed and Death wrote:The Supreme court would have to reverse precedent to allow the Indiana AG to do this. And because Gorsuch joined the liberal block in that decision I do not think it looks like they would reverse precedent in this case.
by Greed and Death » Wed Nov 25, 2020 9:50 pm
San Lumen wrote:Greed and Death wrote:The Supreme court would have to reverse precedent to allow the Indiana AG to do this. And because Gorsuch joined the liberal block in that decision I do not think it looks like they would reverse precedent in this case.
What precedent would they be reversing? I agree with you on Gorsuch. Roberts joined too. Gorsch wrote the opinion on the Lgbt discrimination case,
by Luziyca » Wed Nov 25, 2020 9:50 pm
by Exalted Inquellian State » Wed Nov 25, 2020 9:53 pm
by Luziyca » Wed Nov 25, 2020 9:58 pm
by The Emerald Legion » Wed Nov 25, 2020 11:23 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Himmelland, Kostane, M-x B-rry, Maximum Imperium Rex, New Temecula, Soviet Haaregrad, Statesburg, The Two Jerseys, Tiami, Verkhoyanska, Xind
Advertisement