Tarsonis wrote:Nobel Hobos 2 wrote:
I have said why, quite comprehensively. Unearned privilege is wrong.
You want to make an argument why NOT? Not all countries allow dual citizenship with their own. Are they wrong?
So if you oppose unearned privilege, shouldn't you oppose birthright citizenship entirely.
"Privilege" clearly means "privilege relative to another" and citizenship IS a privilege (not excluding that it might also be a right). If you want to interpret that as "Americans should not have privileges Mexicans do not have" then I can't stop you, just be aware you're pursuing open-borders globalism.
There is literally no way other than open borders or no country having privileges of citizenship, in which people of different nationality could have equal privilege from birth. And even then, they'd need to physically move in many cases.
I'm talking about no unearned privilege from birth, relative to any other citizen of the same country. Specifically, no enduring nationality at birth besides that of the country the person is born in.
It really should not have been necessary to make all these explanations. You knew exactly what I mean, you're just playing dumb.
Service guarantees citizenship and all that?
"Service guarantees citizenship" is either fascist, or a parody of fascism, and we can see in many Middle Eastern countries that it is honored by governments no more than "arbeit macht frei"