by Allenstadt » Sun Sep 13, 2020 2:38 am
by Honeydewistania » Sun Sep 13, 2020 2:40 am
Alger wrote:if you have egoquotes in your signature, touch grass
by Attempted Socialism » Sun Sep 13, 2020 2:46 am
Represented in the World Assembly by Ambassador Robert Mortimer Pride, called The Regicide Assume OOC unless otherwise indicated. My WA Authorship. | Cui Bono, quod seipsos custodes custodiunt? Bobberino: "The academic tone shines through." | Who am I in real life, my opinions and notes My NS career |
by Tinhampton » Sun Sep 13, 2020 3:31 am
by Picairn » Sun Sep 13, 2020 3:50 am
3. Any ships, trains, or other vehicles carrying such substances must be publicly declared and listed.
by Allenstadt » Sun Sep 13, 2020 5:12 am
Honeydewistania wrote:You should unsubmit this, there are a few problems. After a five second glance you mention humans only, and that's going to get major opposition from those who don't have humans as the dominant species
Picairn wrote:3. Any ships, trains, or other vehicles carrying such substances must be publicly declared and listed.
"Why is this clause necessary? Won't this declaration mark these vehicles as easy targets for terrorists and spies to steal radioactive substances for nefarious purposes?"
by Attempted Socialism » Sun Sep 13, 2020 6:15 am
This double negation means the mandate necessitates at least some ill effects; to implement this resolution, workers must get at least some radiation poisoning.Allenstadt wrote:1. All radioactive substances must be stored inside lead or other high-density material containers which must be thick enough to prevent anyone standing directly outside the container to feel no ill effects.
So some removal is OK. Further, with released, any place and harm being slightly ambiguous, accidents are illegal and removal of radioactive material in case of accidents is illegal.2. All radioactive substances may not be removed except at their designated areas and must not be released at any place where they may harm the environment or the public.
No obvious grammar issues.3. Any ships, trains, or other vehicles carrying such substances must be publicly declared and listed.
This is a mandate on the radiation. The protocols could say "arrest the radiation" and still comply with the resolution as written.4. Any such vehicles as mentioned above should take reasonable precautions to ensure for protections of workers on such ships if there is a problem resulting in a leak of radioactive substances, and have protocols to ensure that in case of a leak, radiation may not leak out to the public or surrounding environment
No obvious grammar issues.4. Any exports or imports of such substances must also be publicly declared and comply by these regulations.
Since company is ambiguous and the "or" is open for blame-shifting, I don't think this will have the intended effect.5. Any workers transporting these substances must be provided with free protection gear by the company or government transporting these substances. If they or anyone else requires medical care/attention due to being exposed to substances they are transporting, the Company or Government responsible must pay for this healthcare and funeral costs, if necessary.
No obvious grammar issues.6. Radioactive Substances may not be transported by airplanes, helicopters, or any method which involves the substance being airborne.
Is this a removal or release? Because that's illegal.7. Any vehicle which contains radiation due to a leak must be safely disposed.
But if you're two in the car, it's OK.8. Individual civilians may not transport radioactive substances excepting special need and a permit from their respective government.
Represented in the World Assembly by Ambassador Robert Mortimer Pride, called The Regicide Assume OOC unless otherwise indicated. My WA Authorship. | Cui Bono, quod seipsos custodes custodiunt? Bobberino: "The academic tone shines through." | Who am I in real life, my opinions and notes My NS career |
by Merni » Sun Sep 13, 2020 6:17 am
Allenstadt wrote:Honeydewistania wrote:You should unsubmit this, there are a few problems. After a five second glance you mention humans only, and that's going to get major opposition from those who don't have humans as the dominant species
That's why I included the 0.5 mSv/month, which is the tolerance limit for most species.
by Picairn » Sun Sep 13, 2020 6:26 am
by Araraukar » Sun Sep 13, 2020 6:09 pm
Apologies for absences, non-COVID health issues leave me with very little energy at times.Giovenith wrote:And sorry hun, if you were looking for a forum site where nobody argued, you've come to wrong one.
by Attempted Socialism » Mon Sep 14, 2020 1:16 am
Represented in the World Assembly by Ambassador Robert Mortimer Pride, called The Regicide Assume OOC unless otherwise indicated. My WA Authorship. | Cui Bono, quod seipsos custodes custodiunt? Bobberino: "The academic tone shines through." | Who am I in real life, my opinions and notes My NS career |
by Ardiveds » Mon Sep 14, 2020 4:45 am
Allenstadt wrote:What do you think of this?
6. Radioactive Substances may not be transported by airplanes, helicopters, or any method which involves the substance being airborne.
by Fre Cruth » Mon Sep 14, 2020 7:47 pm
by Kenmoria » Tue Sep 15, 2020 8:55 am
Fre Cruth wrote:I really like this, I think it is well worded and well thought out. I can see where people are coming from about the backlash that animals are not included in the first clause but honestly don't see the need. If we are safely transporting radioactive materials for humans than it is most likely Safe for animals. Also the reality it that humans are the main priority anyways.
by Attempted Socialism » Tue Sep 15, 2020 9:00 am
Represented in the World Assembly by Ambassador Robert Mortimer Pride, called The Regicide Assume OOC unless otherwise indicated. My WA Authorship. | Cui Bono, quod seipsos custodes custodiunt? Bobberino: "The academic tone shines through." | Who am I in real life, my opinions and notes My NS career |
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: The Galactic Supremacy
Advertisement