Advertisement
by Alcala-Cordel » Tue Sep 01, 2020 11:59 pm
by West Leas Oros 2 » Wed Sep 02, 2020 12:03 am
WLO Public News: Outdated Factbooks and other documents in process of major redesign! ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE: <error:not found>
by West Leas Oros 2 » Wed Sep 02, 2020 12:08 am
Impaled Nazarene wrote:Bormiar wrote:What spamming? What “proposals”?
Clearly you’re coming here with nothing but “four legs good” bias and little understanding of the Security Council, so let me clue you in. We don’t take it lightly when regions try to use us to make themselves look good. We don’t take lying and bullying lightly. We don’t take toxicity, or the creations of toxic players, lightly. We don’t take it lightly when players mislead voters to pass their proposal. We don’t take it lightly when players endorse torture. The moderators decided that the Red Fleet was too toxic to even be allowed to exist for a while. We sure as hell shouldn’t commend them.
I’m going to take a guess: you didn’t read the proposal, or you just didn’t care. You conflated it with right-wing propaganda the moment you read the title. I can’t correct your bias. I’m not going to try and stop you from voting against. Because I know that the majority are going to be sensible; they will either vote for or give a rational, thought-out reason to vote against (which I haven’t seen yet).
Commend those that bash the fash and their bootlickers. No platform for them.
WLO Public News: Outdated Factbooks and other documents in process of major redesign! ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE: <error:not found>
by West Leas Oros 2 » Wed Sep 02, 2020 12:10 am
Picairn wrote:"Support. No matter how noble the ideology of anti-fascism is, it does not justify the war crimes committed in its name."
WLO Public News: Outdated Factbooks and other documents in process of major redesign! ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE: <error:not found>
by West Leas Oros 2 » Wed Sep 02, 2020 12:22 am
West Leas Oros 2 wrote:OOC: Daring, aren't we? Don't count on this passing. TRF has high regard amongst the community, deserved or otherwise. Go ahead with this, and I might even consider lending a vote, but don't expect a victory.
IC: "Well, The Red Fleet has certainly acted... distastefully in the past, and they are quite the intimidator as well as the sanctioned and armed, well... arm of interregional diplomacy and conflict. Perhaps it would be best to monitor the situation, re-read the repeal, monitor it more, and act if necessary."
WLO Public News: Outdated Factbooks and other documents in process of major redesign! ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE: <error:not found>
by WayNeacTia » Wed Sep 02, 2020 3:06 am
West Leas Oros 2 wrote:OOC: Daring, aren't we? Don't count on this passing. TRF has high regard amongst the community, deserved or otherwise. Go ahead with this, and I might even consider lending a vote, but don't expect a victory.
RiderSyl wrote:You'd really think that defenders would communicate with each other about this. I know they're not a hivemind, but at least some level of PR skill would keep Quebecshire and Quebecshire from publically contradicting eac
wait
by Yokiria » Wed Sep 02, 2020 5:31 am
Wayneactia wrote:While their "fash bash" agenda may be laudable
by North American Imperial State » Wed Sep 02, 2020 6:54 am
by Cutie Mark Crusader » Wed Sep 02, 2020 9:24 am
by Fearann Dorcha » Wed Sep 02, 2020 9:43 am
Yokiria wrote:Quick, what's a synonym for "laudable" that starts with the letter C?
Cutie Mark Crusader wrote:I am going to admit that I am new and that this is a little intimidating for me, but I can't help feel like this is just an attempt to discredit a group that seems to be consistently anti Nazi and fascists, because of that same stance, on a laundry list of claims that are technicalities.
... In a world that has rising right wing violence, I think consistently being against Nazi's is worthy of commending, and that technicalities are a time old tradition to discredit the far-left by the far right.
I get a sense what this group is for, and it sounds like they are against Nazi's and fascists and have a history of doing so. I dont think it matters how much, who said what, just how 'right wing' a group they opposed was to commend their actions. So I implore my fellow nations to vote against.
by Bhang Bhang Duc » Wed Sep 02, 2020 10:55 am
West Leas Oros 2 wrote:OOC: Daring, aren't we? Don't count on this passing. TRF has high regard amongst the community, deserved or otherwise. Go ahead with this, and I might even consider lending a vote, but don't expect a victory.
Pierconium wrote:I see Funk as an opportunistic manipulator that utilises the means available to him to reach his goals. In other words, a nation after my own heart.
RiderSyl wrote:If an enchantress made it so one raid could bring about world peace, Unibot would ask raiders to just sign a petition instead.
Sedgistan wrote:The SC has just has a spate of really shitty ones recently from Northumbria, his Watermelon fanboy…..
by The Turkish workers of Europe » Wed Sep 02, 2020 12:02 pm
by Fauxia » Wed Sep 02, 2020 7:52 pm
by West Leas Oros 2 » Wed Sep 02, 2020 7:55 pm
Fauxia wrote:More than a third of the vote against right now is NSLeft Delegates (or a TRF invader delegate). That’s not counting the individual nations voting against, or the Democratic Socialist Assembly.
WLO Public News: Outdated Factbooks and other documents in process of major redesign! ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE: <error:not found>
by Yokiria » Thu Sep 03, 2020 5:29 am
Fearann Dorcha wrote:Yokiria wrote:Quick, what's a synonym for "laudable" that starts with the letter C?
Good job taking what they said out of context.
What they were saying was that their actions towards ending toxicity was good and worthy of a commendation, but their actions towards other things was not.
by Fauxia » Thu Sep 03, 2020 7:02 am
Yokiria wrote:Fearann Dorcha wrote:
Good job taking what they said out of context.
What they were saying was that their actions towards ending toxicity was good and worthy of a commendation, but their actions towards other things was not.
Oh stop. Leaving out that context in my response didn't affect anything.
by Riverpost » Thu Sep 03, 2020 11:27 am
Yokiria wrote:Fearann Dorcha wrote:
Good job taking what they said out of context.
What they were saying was that their actions towards ending toxicity was good and worthy of a commendation, but their actions towards other things was not.
Oh stop. Leaving out that context in my response didn't affect anything.
by WayNeacTia » Thu Sep 03, 2020 2:20 pm
RiderSyl wrote:You'd really think that defenders would communicate with each other about this. I know they're not a hivemind, but at least some level of PR skill would keep Quebecshire and Quebecshire from publically contradicting eac
wait
by Yokiria » Thu Sep 03, 2020 3:08 pm
Riverpost wrote:I believe you overestimate the thoroughness of the internet community at large.
by WayNeacTia » Thu Sep 03, 2020 5:23 pm
RiderSyl wrote:You'd really think that defenders would communicate with each other about this. I know they're not a hivemind, but at least some level of PR skill would keep Quebecshire and Quebecshire from publically contradicting eac
wait
by Yokiria » Thu Sep 03, 2020 6:23 pm
Wayneactia wrote:your post was funny and I was amused by it
by Drop Your Pants » Thu Sep 03, 2020 8:59 pm
Wayneactia wrote:Syl, while your post was funny and I was amused by it, you did take it out of context.
by WayNeacTia » Thu Sep 03, 2020 9:00 pm
RiderSyl wrote:You'd really think that defenders would communicate with each other about this. I know they're not a hivemind, but at least some level of PR skill would keep Quebecshire and Quebecshire from publically contradicting eac
wait
by Yokiria » Fri Sep 04, 2020 10:34 am
by Boscaza » Fri Sep 04, 2020 2:24 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement