Anyway, comment away.
[title] Meat Meet
[description] @@DEMONYMADJECTIVE@@ moralists are outraged, as per usual. This time, they're having a roast of your ambassador to the United Federation, @@RANDOMNAME(1)@@, who was revealed to have eaten fried chicken at a meeting with their Secretary of State.
[validity] vegetarianism, adult
[option] "I'm not going to mince words," says ethicist @@RANDOMNAME@@, waving celery sticks in your face. "The corrupt ambassador gamed the system to put that Secretary's meat in @@HIS(1)@@ mouth. That jerk is a total disgrace. We cannot have an ambassador who approves of the slaughter of innocents that takes place in the United Federation. It's time to trim the fat and give Ambassador @@LASTNAME(1)@@ the chop."
[fallout] government officials who do an offal job get smoked
[option] "Can we get to the heart of the tissue - er, issue?" asks @@RANDOMNAME(1)@@, while grilling Federation Freddie's Definitely Veggie Not Smuggled Real Beef Burgers. "Meat is an important component of the United Federation's culture, and it would be disrespectful to refuse the dishes in their country. I support the ban on meat eating in @@NAME@@, but on some rare occasions, ambassadors need to accommodate their hosts for a job well done. We should be allowed to do whatever it takes to keep foreign relationships from spoiling."
[fallout] the steaks are too high for ambassadors to butcher foreign relationships
[option] "The ambassador is chickening away from what @@HE(1)@@ should say," asserts @@RANDOMNAME@@, porky four-time winner of the @@CAPITAL@@ Vegetarian Hot Dog Eating Contest. "If ambassadors are going to get their hands on meat anyway, everyone else should be able to without the law crying 'fowl'. We can flesh out an agreement to keep some unethical practices off the table, but we're adults for crying out loud. Shouldn't we be able to chews what we eat?"
[fallout] the legalization of meat has skewered the sales of vegetarian substitutes