Separatist Peoples wrote:Staypuftonia wrote:"Why should we be forced to allow people to kill babies just because it's "convenient"?
Why should babies have to be killed because of them being the result of rape?
Why should babies be allowed to be killed just because they have Down syndrome?"
Ooc: if you want to ban abortion, you need to write a few repeals. This draft does not legalize abortion because other resolutions do that. As such, your concerns are off topic. You should read the GA Rules and the General Advice threads if you wish to repeal GAR#128 and GAR#286.
If he/she wants to do that, if this passes this one will need to be repealed first. You can't repeal a resolution that allows abortion before a resolution that makes abortion free.
Separatist Peoples wrote:La xinga wrote:It may cost $10,000,000, but if the rest of stuff cost 2$, that's obviously not normal. It would be a break of WA leg.
Ooc: you mean law? Ideally not, but some nations are willing to make some procedures very hard to obtain in order to also block abortion. That's why this proposal exists.
People smarter than you and I have tried to address similar issues in similar ways. They have failed.
What do you mean it wouldn't break legislation?