by The Princia » Fri Jul 03, 2020 11:33 am
by The Princia » Fri Jul 03, 2020 11:44 am
by Kenmoria » Fri Jul 03, 2020 11:48 am
by Ardiveds » Fri Jul 03, 2020 11:55 am
by The Princia » Fri Jul 03, 2020 12:15 pm
by Komerco » Fri Jul 03, 2020 12:58 pm
by Lyroidia » Fri Jul 03, 2020 3:03 pm
by Attempted Socialism » Fri Jul 03, 2020 3:31 pm
I am unaware of any such studies. AFAIK GM crops are either unchanged or improved in terms of health effects, depending on whether specific genes are changed. Since laboratory-quality GM is merely a better and more precise form of the GM we've been doing since the dawn of farming, I don't think this is a good introduction.The Princia wrote:Knowing that- In some member nations, the use of GM Crops is rising exponentially without any propper regulation.
Acknoledged by- GM Crops can put some long-term effects on the health of sapient individuals.
So all crops are GM, since we've artificially bred all crops to be what they are today? Or are we supposed to take the GM out of the lab to do the change, then test it again later? Or should we do without the scientific method, making sure to introduce unknown and exciting new features into the crops?Schocked by- Governments are not making any regulations to regulate the use of GM Crops.
So hereby the World Assembly defines the GM Crops as-
Any crop's plant whose genetic material is modified artificially by humans in a lab or lab like condition through scientific methods, is considered a GM Crop.
1 and 3 prohibits GM crops, 2 allows further experimentation for safety... but even if safe (And remember, all laboratory-GM crops are either as safe or safer than ordinarily-bred GM crops) it is banned. You're banning it regardless of safety, then why do safety research?So hereby, The World Assembly-
1. Prohibits any kind of genetic modification of any crop's plant.
2. Allows to continue experiments related to modification of genetic material of a crop's plant with the hope of potential removel of those bad effects of GM Crops.
3. Prohibits the use of GM Crops in member nations.
Represented in the World Assembly by Ambassador Robert Mortimer Pride, called The Regicide Assume OOC unless otherwise indicated. My WA Authorship. | Cui Bono, quod seipsos custodes custodiunt? Bobberino: "The academic tone shines through." | Who am I in real life, my opinions and notes My NS career |
by Imperium Anglorum » Fri Jul 03, 2020 4:18 pm
by Komerco » Fri Jul 03, 2020 5:14 pm
by Cretox State » Fri Jul 03, 2020 8:32 pm
by Komerco » Sat Jul 04, 2020 4:02 am
Cretox State wrote:OOC: Welcome to the General Assembly!
Generally speaking, GA proposals tend to follow a certain format (some more closely than others). While there’s nothing inherently wrong with trying something different, do know that most resolutions are written in a certain way because that way works.
Additionally, you should probably be looking more towards regulating within a topic (such as GMOs), rather than attempting to enact a blanket ban. GMOs are a key component of agriculture around the world, with ~90% of corn grown in the US being genetically engineered as of 2013.
Also, I would ask why regulating GMOs through a resolution in any stringent manner is even necessary to begin with. Wouldn’t it make more sense to regulate products based on their nature instead of how they were produced? In that case, why can’t GMOs be regulated through laws governing conventional products?
by Picairn » Sat Jul 04, 2020 4:51 am
by Foril » Sat Jul 04, 2020 9:59 am
by Union of Sovereign States and Republics » Sat Jul 04, 2020 11:30 am
News: BREAKING NEWS: Unceremoniously, USSR officially departs from the European Union 2 years before schedule
by Grays Harbor » Sat Jul 04, 2020 11:54 am
The Princia wrote:Knowing that- In some member nations, the use of GM Crops is rising exponentially without any propper regulation.
So? Why are more regulations necessary?
Acknoledged by- GM Crops can put some long-term effects on the health of sapient individuals.
acknowledged by who? Rivals? Luddites?
Schocked by- Governments are not making any regulations to regulate the use of GM Crops.
Shocked that you believe crops need more regulation without any good reason.
So hereby the World Assembly defines the GM Crops as-
Any crop's plant whose genetic material is modified artificially by humans in a lab or lab like condition through scientific methods, is considered a GM Crop.
Darn that sciencey stuff! Ban it!
So hereby, The World Assembly-
1. Prohibits any kind of genetic modification of any crop's plant.
Draconian claptrap
2. Allows to continue experiments related to modification of genetic material of a crop's plant with the hope of potential removel of those bad effects of GM Crops.
And you just contradicted #1
3. Prohibits the use of GM Crops in member nations.
Prohibition based on fear driven pseudo-science. Excellent plan.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Tigrisia
Advertisement