by Ekukao » Fri Jul 03, 2020 5:49 pm
by Tinhampton » Fri Jul 03, 2020 5:51 pm
Ekukao wrote:I propose that any low economy nation will be suggested to decide the option that has the greatest chance of raising their economy.
by Gig em Aggies » Fri Jul 03, 2020 5:55 pm
by Outer Sparta » Fri Jul 03, 2020 6:09 pm
by Komerco » Fri Jul 03, 2020 6:28 pm
Outer Sparta wrote:Where's the proposal?
by Outer Sparta » Fri Jul 03, 2020 6:29 pm
by Honeydewistania » Fri Jul 03, 2020 6:31 pm
Alger wrote:if you have egoquotes in your signature, touch grass
by Ekukao » Fri Jul 03, 2020 6:37 pm
Tinhampton wrote:Ekukao wrote:I propose that any low economy nation will be suggested to decide the option that has the greatest chance of raising their economy.
Illegal for game mechanics, branding, and proposal basics (including but not limited to having no operative clause) - and probably more I've missed. Could you please rewrite this?
Otherwise, full support ;p
by Komerco » Fri Jul 03, 2020 6:46 pm
by Outer Sparta » Fri Jul 03, 2020 7:04 pm
Tinhampton wrote:Ekukao wrote:I propose that any low economy nation will be suggested to decide the option that has the greatest chance of raising their economy.
Illegal for game mechanics, branding, and proposal basics (including but not limited to having no operative clause) - and probably more I've missed. Could you please rewrite this?
Otherwise, full support ;p
Ekukao wrote:What’s game mechanics, branding, and proposal basics?
by WayNeacTia » Fri Jul 03, 2020 7:43 pm
RiderSyl wrote:You'd really think that defenders would communicate with each other about this. I know they're not a hivemind, but at least some level of PR skill would keep Quebecshire and Quebecshire from publically contradicting eac
wait
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Tigrisia
Advertisement