NATION

PASSWORD

LWDT IX: Discussing the Left From All Engels

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

What kind of Leftist are you?

Centrist/Moderate/Third wayer.
17
12%
Social Liberal
10
7%
Social Democrat
22
16%
Green Progressive
7
5%
Democratic Socialist
25
18%
Marxist Communist
19
14%
Anarchist Communist
20
14%
Other (please state)
20
14%
 
Total votes : 140

User avatar
The New California Republic
Post Czar
 
Posts: 35483
Founded: Jun 06, 2011
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby The New California Republic » Thu Jun 11, 2020 4:46 pm

United Muscovite Nations wrote:
The New California Republic wrote:Generally speaking I don't see the harm caused by pornography, so a blanket ban doesn't seem warranted at all.

The harm is that it is virtually impossible to regulate as an industry if it is legal

Can you demonstrate that by necessity leads to harms on a scale that warrants a blanket ban?

United Muscovite Nations wrote:and abuses of sex workers is common in the industry even in countries where it is legal.

Blanket ban though still seems unwarranted even with that.
Last edited by Sigmund Freud on Sat Sep 23, 1939 2:23 am, edited 999 times in total.

The Irradiated Wasteland of The New California Republic: depicting the expanded NCR, several years after the total victory over Caesar's Legion, and the annexation of New Vegas and its surrounding areas.

White-collared conservatives flashing down the street
Pointing their plastic finger at me
They're hoping soon, my kind will drop and die
But I'm going to wave my freak flag high
Wave on, wave on
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||

User avatar
Cisairse
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10935
Founded: Mar 17, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Cisairse » Thu Jun 11, 2020 4:46 pm

Washington Resistance Army wrote:
United Muscovite Nations wrote:The harm is that it is virtually impossible to regulate as an industry if it is legal, and abuses of sex workers is common in the industry even in countries where it is legal.


Addiction to it and it fucking with ones brain, especially if you're younger, is also becoming a more and more well documented thing afaik.


You can get addicted to anything.
The details of the above post are subject to leftist infighting.

I officially endorse Fivey Fox for president of the United States.

User avatar
Cekoviu
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16954
Founded: Oct 18, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Cekoviu » Thu Jun 11, 2020 4:47 pm

Mirjt wrote:Banning most things does not work (examples include alcohol, marijuana, other drugs, undocumented immigration, etc...).

Nor do I think pornography should be banned. We should really decriminalize and regulate all consensual sex work.

Virtually no "sex work" is consensual as of now.
Valrifell wrote:To play devil's advocate, the idea behind banning something isn't quite exactly to reduce the rate of consumption to 0%, but to just reduce it all. Hot take here, but to that point prohibition actually worked to that goal to an extent.

Yes, my brother, you are learning!
The New California Republic wrote:Generally speaking I don't see the harm caused by pornography, so a blanket ban doesn't seem warranted at all.

- Professional pornography is coercive by nature and so is essentially selling videos and photos of people (disturbingly frequently homeless people, drug addicts, et al.) being raped.
- Amateur pornography cannot be regulated and therefore you cannot be certain that any particular piece is truly consensual. A percentage in the double digits (can't remember exactly what) of amateur pornography is nonconsensual and/or includes underage people.
- On the consumer side, using pornography can produce inaccurate and unhealthy ideas about sex and makes it easier for people to avoid getting in relationships because they can be sexually satisfied by the interwebz.
pro: women's rights
anti: men's rights

User avatar
Mirjt
Diplomat
 
Posts: 621
Founded: Mar 23, 2020
Ex-Nation

Postby Mirjt » Thu Jun 11, 2020 4:48 pm

United Muscovite Nations wrote:
Mirjt wrote:Banning most things does not work (examples include alcohol, marijuana, other drugs, etc...).

Nor do I think pornography should be banned. We should really decriminalize and regulate all consensual sex work.

The problem with that is that as an industry, it is very difficult to regulate without strong controls on the places it can be accessed. And again, and I am tired of making this point so often in this thread: criminalizing something is not about your ability to enforce it, it is about putting sanctions on the creation of it. Banning murder did not end murder, that doesn't mean we should scrap the criminal code.


That is a good point, however in some cases banning something will just make the situation worse. We should be trying to minimum the things that we ban to things that are genuinely harmful and to things that a ban will actually help people (for example a ban on abortion just led women to do underground abortions which put her in dangerous and vulnerable situations or threatened her life due to lack of safety, banning abortions only slightly reduced abortion rates and they made the situation so much worse - that alone is a good reason not to ban abortions, not even taking into account the woman's right to her body - a ban on abortions would do no good).

I don't think pornography and sex work is something that needs to be or should be banned, I think they should be decriminalized where they are criminalized and then well-regulated.

Valrifell wrote:To play devil's advocate, the idea behind banning something isn't quite exactly to reduce the rate of consumption to 0%, but to just reduce it all. Hot take here, but to that point prohibition actually worked to that goal to an extent.


That is very true, prohibition did reduce the rate of alcohol consumption and it also reduced the crime rate. People often only think that the crime rate went up because of the increase of organized crime and violence, but other alcohol related crime - such as alcohol induced domestic abuse, actually cause the overall crime rate to decrease. Though I am not convinced that the prohibition of alcohol actually met its intended goals or that the reduction in alcohol consumption was that great or that alcohol should be banned. I say that as someone who has never tried alcohol (I am 24 years old), and never wants to try alcohol, and who believes we should levy a high sin tax on alcohol.
About Me | RL Politics | Likes/Dislikes (WIP) | Mirjt's Stance on NS Stats | Mirjt's Factbooks
I'm back from my break from NationStates (though I may take another at any time)
I'm on an SSRI anti-depressant now.

“Your Honor, years ago I recognized my kinship with all living beings, and I made up my mind that I was not one bit better than the meanest on earth. I said then, and I say now, that while there is a lower class, I am in it, and while there is a criminal element I am of it, and while there is a soul in prison, I am not free.” ― Eugene V. Debs

User avatar
South Odreria 2
Minister
 
Posts: 3102
Founded: Aug 26, 2019
Ex-Nation

Postby South Odreria 2 » Thu Jun 11, 2020 4:48 pm

Cisairse wrote:
Washington Resistance Army wrote:
Addiction to it and it fucking with ones brain, especially if you're younger, is also becoming a more and more well documented thing afaik.


You can get addicted to anything.

This deserves either a hurr durr or one of tHeSe
Last edited by South Odreria 2 on Thu Jun 11, 2020 4:50 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Valrifell wrote:
Disregard whatever this poster says

User avatar
Cisairse
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10935
Founded: Mar 17, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Cisairse » Thu Jun 11, 2020 4:49 pm

South Odreria 2 wrote:
Cisairse wrote:
You can get addicted to anything.

This deserves either a hurr durr or one of tHeSe


You're talking to someone who supports the legalization of recreational heroin. I will take every opportunity to dab on paternalists.
The details of the above post are subject to leftist infighting.

I officially endorse Fivey Fox for president of the United States.

User avatar
Mirjt
Diplomat
 
Posts: 621
Founded: Mar 23, 2020
Ex-Nation

Postby Mirjt » Thu Jun 11, 2020 4:51 pm

I am not going to engage in the topic of banning pornography any further, as it is making it uncomfortable.
About Me | RL Politics | Likes/Dislikes (WIP) | Mirjt's Stance on NS Stats | Mirjt's Factbooks
I'm back from my break from NationStates (though I may take another at any time)
I'm on an SSRI anti-depressant now.

“Your Honor, years ago I recognized my kinship with all living beings, and I made up my mind that I was not one bit better than the meanest on earth. I said then, and I say now, that while there is a lower class, I am in it, and while there is a criminal element I am of it, and while there is a soul in prison, I am not free.” ― Eugene V. Debs

User avatar
South Odreria 2
Minister
 
Posts: 3102
Founded: Aug 26, 2019
Ex-Nation

Postby South Odreria 2 » Thu Jun 11, 2020 4:52 pm

Cisairse wrote:
South Odreria 2 wrote:This deserves either a hurr durr or one of tHeSe


You're talking to someone who supports the legalization of recreational heroin. I will take every opportunity to dab on paternalists.

hurr durr legalize heroin
Valrifell wrote:
Disregard whatever this poster says

User avatar
Mirjt
Diplomat
 
Posts: 621
Founded: Mar 23, 2020
Ex-Nation

Postby Mirjt » Thu Jun 11, 2020 4:54 pm

South Odreria 2 wrote:
Cisairse wrote:
You're talking to someone who supports the legalization of recreational heroin. I will take every opportunity to dab on paternalists.

hurr durr legalize heroin


If the topic is the banning of drugs on the other hand. I am also in favor of the decriminalization of almost all drugs, and the establishment of safe injection sites and increased funding to drug addiction treatment and safety guidelines for self-medication and recreation drug use while encouraging discussion with physicians.
About Me | RL Politics | Likes/Dislikes (WIP) | Mirjt's Stance on NS Stats | Mirjt's Factbooks
I'm back from my break from NationStates (though I may take another at any time)
I'm on an SSRI anti-depressant now.

“Your Honor, years ago I recognized my kinship with all living beings, and I made up my mind that I was not one bit better than the meanest on earth. I said then, and I say now, that while there is a lower class, I am in it, and while there is a criminal element I am of it, and while there is a soul in prison, I am not free.” ― Eugene V. Debs

User avatar
Duvniask
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6571
Founded: Aug 30, 2012
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Duvniask » Thu Jun 11, 2020 4:55 pm

Cisairse wrote:
South Odreria 2 wrote:This deserves either a hurr durr or one of tHeSe


You're talking to someone who supports the legalization of recreational heroin. I will take every opportunity to dab on paternalists.

Are you gonna go full libertarian and say that seat belt laws are slavery, too?

User avatar
Washington Resistance Army
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54805
Founded: Aug 08, 2011
Father Knows Best State

Postby Washington Resistance Army » Thu Jun 11, 2020 4:55 pm

Unironically declare drug cartels to be terror organizations and go full force on them
Hellenic Polytheist, Socialist

User avatar
The New California Republic
Post Czar
 
Posts: 35483
Founded: Jun 06, 2011
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby The New California Republic » Thu Jun 11, 2020 4:56 pm

Cekoviu wrote:Professional pornography is coercive by nature and so is essentially selling videos and photos of people (disturbingly frequently homeless people, drug addicts, et al.) being raped.

That's probably a problem with the coercion that is inherent in the need to sell one's labour, and can thus be attributed as a problem with capitalism rather than pornography in and of itself.

Cekoviu wrote:Amateur pornography cannot be regulated and therefore you cannot be certain that any particular piece is truly consensual. A percentage in the double digits (can't remember exactly what) of amateur pornography is nonconsensual and/or includes underage people.

Unless I see some stats I'm going to estimate those double digits are low, i.e. 10%.

Cekoviu wrote:On the consumer side, using pornography can produce inaccurate and unhealthy ideas about sex and makes it easier for people to avoid getting in relationships because they can be sexually satisfied by the interwebz.

Sure, it can, but any conceivable thing can possibly have a negative influence on one's ideas, so that argument isn't exactly rock solid.
Last edited by Sigmund Freud on Sat Sep 23, 1939 2:23 am, edited 999 times in total.

The Irradiated Wasteland of The New California Republic: depicting the expanded NCR, several years after the total victory over Caesar's Legion, and the annexation of New Vegas and its surrounding areas.

White-collared conservatives flashing down the street
Pointing their plastic finger at me
They're hoping soon, my kind will drop and die
But I'm going to wave my freak flag high
Wave on, wave on
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||

User avatar
Cisairse
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10935
Founded: Mar 17, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Cisairse » Thu Jun 11, 2020 4:57 pm

South Odreria 2 wrote:
Cisairse wrote:
You're talking to someone who supports the legalization of recreational heroin. I will take every opportunity to dab on paternalists.

hurr durr legalize heroin

Image
The details of the above post are subject to leftist infighting.

I officially endorse Fivey Fox for president of the United States.

User avatar
Cekoviu
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16954
Founded: Oct 18, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Cekoviu » Thu Jun 11, 2020 4:57 pm

Cisairse wrote:
South Odreria 2 wrote:This deserves either a hurr durr or one of tHeSe


You're talking to someone who supports the legalization of recreational heroin. I will take every opportunity to dab on paternalists.

yOuRe TaLkInG tO sOmEoNe WhO sUpPoRtS tHe LeGaLiZaTiOn Of ReCrEaTiOnAl HeRoIn
pro: women's rights
anti: men's rights

User avatar
The Black Forrest
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 59282
Founded: Antiquity
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby The Black Forrest » Thu Jun 11, 2020 4:57 pm

Duvniask wrote:
Cisairse wrote:
You're talking to someone who supports the legalization of recreational heroin. I will take every opportunity to dab on paternalists.

Are you gonna go full libertarian and say that seat belt laws are slavery, too?


They still doing that? I thought they moved to motorcycle helmets are slavery.
*I am a master proofreader after I click Submit.
* There is actually a War on Christmas. But Christmas started it, with it's unparalleled aggression against the Thanksgiving Holiday, and now Christmas has seized much Lebensraum in November, and are pushing into October. The rest of us seek to repel these invaders, and push them back to the status quo ante bellum Black Friday border. -Trotskylvania
* Silence Is Golden But Duct Tape Is Silver.
* I felt like Ayn Rand cornered me at a party, and three minutes in I found my first objection to what she was saying, but she kept talking without interruption for ten more days. - Max Barry talking about Atlas Shrugged

User avatar
South Odreria 2
Minister
 
Posts: 3102
Founded: Aug 26, 2019
Ex-Nation

Postby South Odreria 2 » Thu Jun 11, 2020 4:59 pm

Mirjt wrote:
South Odreria 2 wrote:hurr durr legalize heroin


If the topic is the banning of drugs on the other hand. I am also in favor of the decriminalization of almost all drugs, and the establishment of safe injection sites and increased funding to drug addiction treatment and safety guidelines for self-medication and recreation drug use while encouraging discussion with physicians.

Safe injection sites and guidelines and discussions don’t actually do anything except make people feel good about other people dying
Valrifell wrote:
Disregard whatever this poster says

User avatar
Duvniask
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6571
Founded: Aug 30, 2012
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Duvniask » Thu Jun 11, 2020 5:00 pm

The Black Forrest wrote:
Duvniask wrote:Are you gonna go full libertarian and say that seat belt laws are slavery, too?


They still doing that? I thought they moved to motorcycle helmets are slavery.

I'm not referring to a current case, but such ridiculousness is no doubt with us, still.

User avatar
The New California Republic
Post Czar
 
Posts: 35483
Founded: Jun 06, 2011
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby The New California Republic » Thu Jun 11, 2020 5:03 pm

Cisairse wrote:
South Odreria 2 wrote:hurr durr legalize heroin

Snip

Can you please spoiler that image, it is a bit large.
Last edited by Sigmund Freud on Sat Sep 23, 1939 2:23 am, edited 999 times in total.

The Irradiated Wasteland of The New California Republic: depicting the expanded NCR, several years after the total victory over Caesar's Legion, and the annexation of New Vegas and its surrounding areas.

White-collared conservatives flashing down the street
Pointing their plastic finger at me
They're hoping soon, my kind will drop and die
But I'm going to wave my freak flag high
Wave on, wave on
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||

User avatar
Salus Maior
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 27813
Founded: Jun 16, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Salus Maior » Thu Jun 11, 2020 7:01 pm

The Black Forrest wrote:
Duvniask wrote:Are you gonna go full libertarian and say that seat belt laws are slavery, too?


They still doing that? I thought they moved to motorcycle helmets are slavery.


Cleaning your room because your mum told you to is slavery.
Traditionalist Catholic, Constitutional Monarchist, Habsburg Nostalgic, Distributist, Disillusioned Millennial.

"In any case we clearly see....That some opportune remedy must be found quickly for the misery and wretchedness pressing so unjustly on the majority of the working class...it has come to pass that working men have been surrendered, isolated and helpless, to the hardheartedness of employers and the greed of unchecked competition." -Pope Leo XIII, Rerum Novarum

User avatar
Northern Davincia
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16960
Founded: Jun 10, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Northern Davincia » Thu Jun 11, 2020 7:14 pm

Duvniask wrote:
Cisairse wrote:
You're talking to someone who supports the legalization of recreational heroin. I will take every opportunity to dab on paternalists.

Are you gonna go full libertarian and say that seat belt laws are slavery, too?

Yes.
Hoppean Libertarian, Acolyte of von Mises, Protector of Our Sacred Liberties
Economic Left/Right: 9.75
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.05
Conserative Morality wrote:"Two gin-scented tears trickled down the sides of his nose. But it was all right, everything was all right, the struggle was finished. He had won the victory over himself. He loved Big Hoppe."

User avatar
Cekoviu
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16954
Founded: Oct 18, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Cekoviu » Thu Jun 11, 2020 7:15 pm

Northern Davincia wrote:
Duvniask wrote:Are you gonna go full libertarian and say that seat belt laws are slavery, too?

Yes.

we know what y*u think
pro: women's rights
anti: men's rights

User avatar
Neanderthaland
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9301
Founded: Sep 10, 2016
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Neanderthaland » Thu Jun 11, 2020 7:24 pm

Northern Davincia wrote:
Duvniask wrote:Are you gonna go full libertarian and say that seat belt laws are slavery, too?

Yes.

Never interrupt your enemy when he is making a mistake.
Ug make fire. Mod ban Ug.

User avatar
United Muscovite Nations
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 25657
Founded: Feb 01, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby United Muscovite Nations » Thu Jun 11, 2020 7:28 pm

The New California Republic wrote:
United Muscovite Nations wrote:The harm is that it is virtually impossible to regulate as an industry if it is legal

Can you demonstrate that by necessity leads to harms on a scale that warrants a blanket ban?

United Muscovite Nations wrote:and abuses of sex workers is common in the industry even in countries where it is legal.

Blanket ban though still seems unwarranted even with that.

Sex work is non-consensual, so.
Grumpy Grandpa of the LWDT and RWDT
Kantian with panentheist and Christian beliefs. Rawlsian Socialist. Just completed studies in History and International Relations. Asexual with sex-revulsion.
The world is grey, the mountains old, the forges fire is ashen cold. No harp is wrung, no hammer falls, the darkness dwells in Durin's halls...
Formerly United Marxist Nations, Dec 02, 2011- Feb 01, 2017. +33,837 posts
Borderline Personality Disorder, currently in treatment. I apologize if I blow up at you. TG me for info, can't discuss publicly because the mods support stigma on mental illness.

User avatar
Shanghai industrial complex
Minister
 
Posts: 2862
Founded: Feb 20, 2020
Ex-Nation

Postby Shanghai industrial complex » Thu Jun 11, 2020 7:32 pm

United Muscovite Nations wrote:
The New California Republic wrote:Can you demonstrate that by necessity leads to harms on a scale that warrants a blanket ban?


Blanket ban though still seems unwarranted even with that.

Sex work is non-consensual, so.

Why don't feminists object to sex work? This is a job that materialize female
Last edited by Shanghai industrial complex on Thu Jun 11, 2020 7:35 pm, edited 1 time in total.
多看空我 仮面ライダークウガをたくさん見てください Watch more Masked Rider Kukuku Kuuga!

User avatar
Cisairse
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10935
Founded: Mar 17, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Cisairse » Thu Jun 11, 2020 7:34 pm

United Muscovite Nations wrote:
The New California Republic wrote:Can you demonstrate that by necessity leads to harms on a scale that warrants a blanket ban?


Blanket ban though still seems unwarranted even with that.

Sex work is non-consensual, so.


Only as it exists today.
The details of the above post are subject to leftist infighting.

I officially endorse Fivey Fox for president of the United States.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Castelia, Godular, Pasong Tirad, So uh lab here

Advertisement

Remove ads