by Brunswick-upon-Raritan » Sat May 23, 2020 7:01 pm
by Galloism » Sat May 23, 2020 7:02 pm
by New haven america » Sat May 23, 2020 7:02 pm
by Brunswick-upon-Raritan » Sat May 23, 2020 7:03 pm
by New haven america » Sat May 23, 2020 7:05 pm
Brunswick-upon-Raritan wrote:No phone should be visible in the school.
by Brunswick-upon-Raritan » Sat May 23, 2020 7:05 pm
by New haven america » Sat May 23, 2020 7:06 pm
Brunswick-upon-Raritan wrote:School is for school, not Snapchat.
by Brunswick-upon-Raritan » Sat May 23, 2020 7:07 pm
by Outer Sparta » Sat May 23, 2020 7:07 pm
by Brunswick-upon-Raritan » Sat May 23, 2020 7:08 pm
by New haven america » Sat May 23, 2020 7:11 pm
Brunswick-upon-Raritan wrote:It's illegal to upload unauthorized footage of minors without their parents' consent, allowing students to use their phones in school jeopardizes the privacy of thousands of individuals.
by Brunswick-upon-Raritan » Sat May 23, 2020 7:13 pm
by New haven america » Sat May 23, 2020 7:13 pm
Brunswick-upon-Raritan wrote:That is literally why students aren't allowed to use their phones in school, though. It's too unsupervised.
by Snakeden » Sat May 23, 2020 7:13 pm
by Heloin » Sat May 23, 2020 7:13 pm
Brunswick-upon-Raritan wrote:It's illegal to upload unauthorized footage of minors without their parents' consent, allowing students to use their phones in school jeopardizes the privacy of thousands of individuals.
by The Two Jerseys » Sat May 23, 2020 7:14 pm
Brunswick-upon-Raritan wrote:That is literally why students aren't allowed to use their phones in school, though. It's too unsupervised.
by Brunswick-upon-Raritan » Sat May 23, 2020 7:15 pm
by Neutraligon » Sat May 23, 2020 7:16 pm
Albrenia wrote:In class, no. In school at large, yes.
Although parents could just do a blanket ban on an individual child's phone use too.
by New haven america » Sat May 23, 2020 7:17 pm
Brunswick-upon-Raritan wrote:I'm appalled any parent would want to send their kid to a school where they would basically have their whole identity exposed to the Internet. And students absolutely should be disciplined for using unauthorized electronic devices in school.
by Ludania » Sat May 23, 2020 7:17 pm
Brunswick-upon-Raritan wrote:I'm appalled any parent would want to send their kid to a school where they would basically have their whole identity exposed to the Internet. And students absolutely should be disciplined for using unauthorized electronic devices in school.
by The Two Jerseys » Sat May 23, 2020 7:17 pm
Brunswick-upon-Raritan wrote:I'm appalled any parent would want to send their kid to a school where they would basically have their whole identity exposed to the Internet. And students absolutely should be disciplined for using unauthorized electronic devices in school.
by Albrenia » Sat May 23, 2020 7:18 pm
Neutraligon wrote:Albrenia wrote:In class, no. In school at large, yes.
Although parents could just do a blanket ban on an individual child's phone use too.
It is legal to photograph or videotape anything and anyone on any public property, within reasonable community standards. As I am allowed to take photos in a public park that may include children and upload that to my facebook account, I would think that students taking pictures of other students would fall under the same guideline, at least in public schools.
by Neutraligon » Sat May 23, 2020 7:19 pm
Albrenia wrote:Neutraligon wrote:It is legal to photograph or videotape anything and anyone on any public property, within reasonable community standards. As I am allowed to take photos in a public park that may include children and upload that to my facebook account, I would think that students taking pictures of other students would fall under the same guideline, at least in public schools.
Yup.
I mostly mean if a parent says 'no phone for you, kid' then that's that.
Mobile Phones aren't a human right or anything.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Ethel mermania, Great Eddy, Hidrandia, Kannap, Plan Neonie, Sarolandia, Statesburg, Tungstan, Untecna
Advertisement