austrian*
Advertisement
by Questarian New Yorkshire » Sat May 23, 2020 10:41 am
by Diopolis » Sat May 23, 2020 10:41 am
Celritannia wrote:Nap the Magnificent wrote:I literally linked you to studies showing that violence increases and that polygamy has been linked to being more warlike in history.
And I also linked sources that show polyamorous, not polygamy which is what you linked, but polyamorous relationships are no different that regular ones.
Know the difference between polygamy and polyamorous.
by Cekoviu » Sat May 23, 2020 10:42 am
by Celritannia » Sat May 23, 2020 10:42 am
My DeviantArt Obey When you annoy a Celritannian U W0T M8?
| Citizen of Earth, Commonwealthian, European, British, Yorkshireman. Atheist, Environmentalist |
by Italios » Sat May 23, 2020 10:43 am
Studies conducted in different countries have shown that polygamy can lead to co-wife jealousy, competition, and unequal distribution of household and emotional resources[17], and generate acrimony between co-wives and between the children of the different wives[18]. They have also shown that polygamy is associated with mental illness (in particular, depression and anxiety) among women and children[15,16]. Chaleby[14] has found a disproportionate number of women in polygamous marriages (mostly senior wives) among psychiatric outpatient and inpatient populations in Kuwait. A recent Turkish study found that the participants from polygamous families, especially senior wives, reported more psychological distress
...
However, husbands from polygamous families were found to be more educated than husbands from monogamous families [basically this proves that men in traditional polygamous relationships with one husband, multiple wives are high status individuals with a lot of bargaining power in a relationship]
...
Monogamous families were more satisfied from their economic state. Significant difference was found between the two familial structures regarding the women’s blood relations to their husband. More monogamous women reported less blood relations with husband compare to polygamous woman. Most of the women in polygamous families were senior wives. In addition, the majority from both familial structures do not agree with the practice of polygamy.
...
The economics of polygamy are particularly problematic. The level of Syrian economic development is very low. Even in the oil rich Persian Gulf region Al-Toniji[29] found that 75% of the participants agreed that the polygamist husband faced economic problems due to the need to pay for two houses. Nevertheless, there are demographic imperatives that occasionally encourage the practice[28]. Polygamy’s evident characteristic of competition and jealousy among co-wives is commonly observed within plural marriage communities[30-32]. This seems predictable, as co-wives are likely to have very limited private time with the lone husband they share, and thus might vie for his attention and favor. In some polygamous communities, women’s self-worthiness is linked to the number of children they bear and, therefore, having time with their husband is also critical to promote their status within the family and community[33]. Studies showed that in certain contexts, jealousy between co-wives can escalate to intolerable levels, resulting in physical injuries sustained by the women, and suicide attempts amongst the women. Families living together in crammed and overcrowded conditions, can create an environment that aggravates stress and conflict between co-wives[34]. Previous research reveals significant implications regarding children’s lower academic achievements, and men’s psychological problems, amongst polygamous marriages[20]. The practice has implications for entire familial structures, and for current and future families and communities.
by Questarian New Yorkshire » Sat May 23, 2020 10:43 am
we can start by hanging child sex criminalsCekoviu wrote:I mean, how do you propose that those children actually be protected from homosexuals in terms of policy? Obviously there is a disturbing trend here, but I doubt that banning gay marriage would do anything to counteract it and it would actively harm the large majority of gay people who aren't pedophiles.
by Celritannia » Sat May 23, 2020 10:43 am
My DeviantArt Obey When you annoy a Celritannian U W0T M8?
| Citizen of Earth, Commonwealthian, European, British, Yorkshireman. Atheist, Environmentalist |
by Questarian New Yorkshire » Sat May 23, 2020 10:43 am
sure
by Celritannia » Sat May 23, 2020 10:44 am
Italios wrote:Studies conducted in different countries have shown that polygamy can lead to co-wife jealousy, competition, and unequal distribution of household and emotional resources[17], and generate acrimony between co-wives and between the children of the different wives[18]. They have also shown that polygamy is associated with mental illness (in particular, depression and anxiety) among women and children[15,16]. Chaleby[14] has found a disproportionate number of women in polygamous marriages (mostly senior wives) among psychiatric outpatient and inpatient populations in Kuwait. A recent Turkish study found that the participants from polygamous families, especially senior wives, reported more psychological distress
...
However, husbands from polygamous families were found to be more educated than husbands from monogamous families [basically this proves that men in traditional polygamous relationships with one husband, multiple wives are high status individuals with a lot of bargaining power in a relationship]
...
Monogamous families were more satisfied from their economic state. Significant difference was found between the two familial structures regarding the women’s blood relations to their husband. More monogamous women reported less blood relations with husband compare to polygamous woman. Most of the women in polygamous families were senior wives. In addition, the majority from both familial structures do not agree with the practice of polygamy.
...
The economics of polygamy are particularly problematic. The level of Syrian economic development is very low. Even in the oil rich Persian Gulf region Al-Toniji[29] found that 75% of the participants agreed that the polygamist husband faced economic problems due to the need to pay for two houses. Nevertheless, there are demographic imperatives that occasionally encourage the practice[28]. Polygamy’s evident characteristic of competition and jealousy among co-wives is commonly observed within plural marriage communities[30-32]. This seems predictable, as co-wives are likely to have very limited private time with the lone husband they share, and thus might vie for his attention and favor. In some polygamous communities, women’s self-worthiness is linked to the number of children they bear and, therefore, having time with their husband is also critical to promote their status within the family and community[33]. Studies showed that in certain contexts, jealousy between co-wives can escalate to intolerable levels, resulting in physical injuries sustained by the women, and suicide attempts amongst the women. Families living together in crammed and overcrowded conditions, can create an environment that aggravates stress and conflict between co-wives[34]. Previous research reveals significant implications regarding children’s lower academic achievements, and men’s psychological problems, amongst polygamous marriages[20]. The practice has implications for entire familial structures, and for current and future families and communities.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3782180/
My DeviantArt Obey When you annoy a Celritannian U W0T M8?
| Citizen of Earth, Commonwealthian, European, British, Yorkshireman. Atheist, Environmentalist |
by Cekoviu » Sat May 23, 2020 10:44 am
by Nakena » Sat May 23, 2020 10:44 am
by Celritannia » Sat May 23, 2020 10:44 am
My DeviantArt Obey When you annoy a Celritannian U W0T M8?
| Citizen of Earth, Commonwealthian, European, British, Yorkshireman. Atheist, Environmentalist |
by Munkcestrian RepubIic » Sat May 23, 2020 10:45 am
The New California Republic wrote:Questarian New Yorkshire wrote:you lodged a report against diop earlier, and I just happened to bump into it
So what? If I see something that looks like trolling then I'll flag it up.Questarian New Yorkshire wrote:what did he do to you? why did you report him? did it bring you some kind of satisfaction that you got something over on someone else? or he made you seriously upset and you didn't want to post on austrian book site because of him?
Nothing, he did nothing. I saw something that looked like trolling and reported it. I've actually reported people I'm friendly with on several occasions, for example Huskar Social Union, so don't read something into this that really isn't there.
by Italios » Sat May 23, 2020 10:45 am
Cekoviu wrote:Italios wrote:okay, so defending the elgeebeetees is more important to you than protecting underage children from sexual abuse? i'll be sure to keep my future kids away from you i guess
I mean, how do you propose that those children actually be protected from homosexuals in terms of policy? Obviously there is a disturbing trend here, but I doubt that banning gay marriage would do anything to counteract it and it would actively harm the large majority of gay people who aren't pedophiles.
by Celritannia » Sat May 23, 2020 10:45 am
Diopolis wrote:Celritannia wrote:
No, it is not.
They are different.
Polygamy is one person in a relationship with multiple people.
Polyamory is all people involved being in a relationship at the same time.
The 2 are completely different.
They are both just expressions of ending the exclusivity principle of relationships.
My DeviantArt Obey When you annoy a Celritannian U W0T M8?
| Citizen of Earth, Commonwealthian, European, British, Yorkshireman. Atheist, Environmentalist |
by Questarian New Yorkshire » Sat May 23, 2020 10:45 am
? yes of course it's strange
by The New California Republic » Sat May 23, 2020 10:45 am
Questarian New Yorkshire wrote:The New California Republic wrote:...am I trying to get him removed from the site? Is that my motivation? This is the first I have heard of it...
come off it, nobody believes you, the more times that people get warned makes their likelihood of being permanently banned higher
Questarian New Yorkshire wrote:if you want people you dont agree with banned then just be honest and say it, the facade is sad
by Questarian New Yorkshire » Sat May 23, 2020 10:46 am
The New California Republic wrote:Questarian New Yorkshire wrote:
come off it, nobody believes you, the more times that people get warned makes their likelihood of being permanently banned higher
I really don't care if anyone doesn't believe that I just report rulebreaking when I see it.
Questarian New Yorkshire wrote:if you want people you dont agree with banned then just be honest and say it, the facade is sad
Again you seem to be reading far too much into the fact I just report rulebreaking when I see it. As I said, the fact that I report folk that I am neutral or friendly towards pokes a big hole in your theory.
by Celritannia » Sat May 23, 2020 10:46 am
My DeviantArt Obey When you annoy a Celritannian U W0T M8?
| Citizen of Earth, Commonwealthian, European, British, Yorkshireman. Atheist, Environmentalist |
by Celritannia » Sat May 23, 2020 10:47 am
My DeviantArt Obey When you annoy a Celritannian U W0T M8?
| Citizen of Earth, Commonwealthian, European, British, Yorkshireman. Atheist, Environmentalist |
by Questarian New Yorkshire » Sat May 23, 2020 10:47 am
The New California Republic wrote:I just report rulebreaking when I see it.
by Questarian New Yorkshire » Sat May 23, 2020 10:48 am
by Italios » Sat May 23, 2020 10:48 am
by Valrifell » Sat May 23, 2020 10:48 am
Questarian New Yorkshire wrote:The New California Republic wrote:
I really don't care if anyone doesn't believe that I just report rulebreaking when I see it.
Again you seem to be reading far too much into the fact I just report rulebreaking when I see it. As I said, the fact that I report folk that I am neutral or friendly towards pokes a big hole in your theory.
well maybe you shouldn't fucking do it, nobody has asked you to do it and all you do is make it worse for the rest of us
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Al-Haqiqah, Azurius, Corporate Collective Salvation, Elwher, Fort Viorlia, Ifreann, Iujhj, Luxeinia, Tungstan, Vassenor
Advertisement