I see. Based on this, it appears that "Access to Abortion" is meant not as a sincere attempt to expand abortion access, but rather as an act of retaliation against the recent attempt to repeal GA#286 and, in a broader sense, as a display of spite towards the pro-lifers within the World Assembly. This is evident from the first paragraph of IA's telegram, in which they discuss the attempted repeal of GA#286 in order to imply afterwards that "Access to Abortion" is a response to that attempt. If that is not blatant enough, look at the proposal's use of the phrase "rabidly anti-choice nations," which serves no purpose other than to petulantly bash and display contempt for pro-lifers. Furthermore, when this proposal was first introduced, it was entitled "Abortionplexes for All" in order to mock pro-lifers by celebrating abortion, which defies the canard that pro-choicers are really "anti-abortion" and only support the legality of abortion as a matter of "choice." If a pro-choicer wanted to demonstrate that they were not obsessed with abortion, they would not be behaving this way. Taking all of these facts into consideration, it is quite apparent that this is merely an act of spite.
And before anyone ridicules me over the "abortionplex" thing, yes, I know that it is a reference from The Onion, and I know what you are trying to insinuate by making that reference. My only response is that for every idiot who falls for satire, there are many more people who are intelligent enough to recognize it. I think you know that painting an entire group with the same brush based on the stupidity of one person is fallacious and disingenuous.