by Lancaster of Wessex » Wed May 06, 2020 1:19 pm
by Trotterdam » Wed May 06, 2020 3:08 pm
by Lelscrep » Wed May 06, 2020 3:41 pm
Trotterdam wrote:Why is this a government issue?
Pretty much any sensible construction team is going to dig up the movies, sell them to whoever wants them (probably someone who plans to restore them), and be done with it. They're not difficult enough to move to justify destroying them as a "cost-saving" measure.
by Ko-oren » Thu May 07, 2020 12:29 am
by Chan Island » Thu May 07, 2020 3:07 am
Conserative Morality wrote:"It's not time yet" is a tactic used by reactionaries in every era. "It's not time for democracy, it's not time for capitalism, it's not time for emancipation." Of course it's not time. It's never time, not on its own. You make it time. If you're under fire in the no-man's land of WW1, you start digging a foxhole even if the ideal time would be when you *aren't* being bombarded, because once you wait for it to be 'time', other situations will need your attention, assuming you survive that long. If the fields aren't furrowed, plow them. If the iron is not hot, make it so. If society is not ready, change it.
by Lancaster of Wessex » Thu May 07, 2020 9:33 am
by Australian rePublic » Thu May 07, 2020 2:02 pm
by Lancaster of Wessex » Thu May 07, 2020 6:29 pm
Australian rePublic wrote:I agree with Trott. This is not a government issue
by Noahs Second Country » Thu May 07, 2020 8:03 pm
by Lancaster of Wessex » Fri May 08, 2020 3:29 pm
Noahs Second Country wrote:At least with the clown one, it is an interesting dilemma because clowns are designed to entertain children, yet it seems like children are being scared of them rather than laughing.
I remember Halloween a while ago where everyone was afraid of being murdered by a clown, and there was also 'It.' It seems like our perception of clowns has been shifted from their original purpose, thus, creating an issue.
by Trotterdam » Fri May 08, 2020 3:48 pm
by Lancaster of Wessex » Fri May 08, 2020 5:28 pm
Trotterdam wrote:That poorly-made issues slipped through the cracks before is not a reason to do so again.
by Australian rePublic » Fri May 08, 2020 5:49 pm
Lancaster of Wessex wrote:Trotterdam wrote:That poorly-made issues slipped through the cracks before is not a reason to do so again.
1). My issue is not, IMHO, "poorly-made";
2). Every issue is edited, so if you have qualms with the quality of what's been published, register your displeasure with the editors;
3). I never said the issues I mentioned were poorly-made, I only suggested they lack "real life" gravitas to be considered government issues;
4). What you or I or anyone consider to be sub-par issues is entirely subjective.
Thank you.
by Lancaster of Wessex » Sat May 09, 2020 2:05 pm
Australian rePublic wrote:Mate, 3 experienced writers told you this ain't a government issue. If you don't wanna take our advice, why post here? That's not to say that it can't be a government issue, but at the moment, it ain't
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement