Oh, is that the current year?
Advertisement
by Cekoviu » Thu Apr 16, 2020 1:47 pm
by Stanmenistan » Thu Apr 16, 2020 2:06 pm
Cekoviu wrote:Stanmenistan wrote:The only way to guarantee gender balance in all careers and fields would be enforcing a neo-Feudalist/Caste system on people, from cradle to grave. Picking out children's career paths out before they are even born. Raising children to consider only one occupation, only one career, only one future, only one possibility, instead of alternatives. That is my idea of a Dystopia.
This is only the case if you think there is actually an inherent biological basis for differences in career choices, which I find highly suspect; all you've offered for that is some really shitty evopsych and toy choices in non-human animals
by Purple Rats » Thu Apr 16, 2020 8:09 pm
Stanmenistan wrote:While you've offered no evidence to counter my arguments. I find that highly suspect. Even TEDx acknowledges the monkey tests when discussing girls and boys toys.
by Albrenia » Thu Apr 16, 2020 10:36 pm
Purple Rats wrote:Stanmenistan wrote:While you've offered no evidence to counter my arguments. I find that highly suspect. Even TEDx acknowledges the monkey tests when discussing girls and boys toys.
This is like third time already when I see that you are linking some monkey test in different threads. Are you obsessed with them?
by Purple Rats » Thu Apr 16, 2020 11:14 pm
by Stanmenistan » Thu Apr 16, 2020 11:44 pm
Purple Rats wrote:Stanmenistan wrote:While you've offered no evidence to counter my arguments. I find that highly suspect. Even TEDx acknowledges the monkey tests when discussing girls and boys toys.
This is like third time already when I see that you are linking some monkey test in different threads. Are you obsessed with them?
by Stanmenistan » Fri Apr 17, 2020 10:19 am
When I was a young girl
My mother took me into the city
To see a zoo and aquarium
She said, "Girl when you grow up
Would you be the savior of the Endangered,
The vulnerable and the Near Threatened?"
She said "Will you defeat them
Their demons, and all the STEMinists
The plans that they have made?"
"Because one day I'll leave you
A phantom to lead you in the summer
To join The Biology Parade"
When I was a young girl
My mother took me into the city
To see a zoo and aquarium
She said, "Girl when you grow up
Would you be the savior of the Endangered,
The vulnerable and the Near Threatened?"
-The Biology Parade (Parody of The Black Parade by My Chemical Romance)
Sweat girlie sweat girlie play is a Texas drought
Me and you do the kind of stuff that only Shakira would sing about
So put your paws down my box and I'll bet you'll feel claws
Yes I'm Backshall, yes I'm Wilkinson and you're getting on the 60
You've had enough of mechanical touch
You want it primal, you're out of bounds
I want you learned, want you educated
Like my zoo house hash browns
Come quicker than Cheetah, never reach an apex
Just like Biotechnology stock
You are inclined to make me rise an hour early
Just like daylight savings time
(Play it now)
You and me girlie ain't nothin' but mammals
So let's play like they do on the Discovery channel
(Do it again now)
You and me girlie ain't nothin' but mammals
So let's play like they do on the Discovery channel
(Gettin' wild now)
-The Biological Touch (A parody of the Bad Touch by The Bloodhound Gang)
by Stanmenistan » Tue Apr 21, 2020 3:56 am
by Nobel Hobos 2 » Tue Apr 21, 2020 4:17 am
by Stanmenistan » Tue Apr 21, 2020 5:45 am
Nobel Hobos 2 wrote:All you're doing is hammering home the impression given by your Original Post. That you're much more interested in putting your own opinion (with links or whatever) than in creating debate on the subject
by Nobel Hobos 2 » Tue Apr 21, 2020 7:30 am
Stanmenistan wrote:Nobel Hobos 2 wrote:All you're doing is hammering home the impression given by your Original Post. That you're much more interested in putting your own opinion (with links or whatever) than in creating debate on the subject
Of course I am hammering home the impression given by your Original Post. I'm showing further evidence. And if anyone does want to debate me on this topic, feel free.
by Stanmenistan » Tue Apr 21, 2020 8:36 am
Nobel Hobos 2 wrote:Stanmenistan wrote:Of course I am hammering home the impression given by your Original Post. I'm showing further evidence. And if anyone does want to debate me on this topic, feel free.
You're doing it wrong.
It actually matters a lot how you phrase the Original Post.
You probably see this thread as "I put a thesis, nobody proved me wrong, therefore I am right"
But what I see is a failure to defend any one point of view, because your OP was too vague to disprove.
The OP is pretty much essential. That's how you get in supporters AND opponents, that's how you cause a debate which you are one participant in. Vague shit does not get that done. Broad issues, won't get it done. You need to TAKE A POSITION in the OP, or get right out of the way and ask an interesting question.
Call it a thread. 9 pages isn't bad, it's well above the average of threads I started (as Ailiailia and as Nobel Hobos too)
Take my advice. Don't use NSG as your blog. Phrase your interest as a question.
by Stanmenistan » Wed Apr 22, 2020 6:35 am
The diversity of courses that fit within the science, technology, engineering and mathematics disciplines is also representative of who is applying for them. An entire sector of professionals have been behind national campaigns to encourage women to study STEM subjects, but there is still a distinct gender split – with young women being drawn to the science-based subjects such as dentistry, nursing, biology, psychology, and medicine, and men to courses within the technology, engineering and mathematics fields.
In fact, by the January application deadline for undergraduate courses starting this September, young women were roughly seven times as likely to apply for courses in both veterinary sciences and education and learning. Men were around four times as likely to apply to courses in both computing, and engineering and technology.
There are, however, initiates to help young girls from as young as five to get involved in science- and technology-based subjects and Anne-Marie suggests seeking them out. “Young women are great at problem-solving,” she says. “They want to help find resolutions, which is why subjects such as medicine, biology and veterinary science don’t have the same problems recruiting women”
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Bovad, Danyum, Dumb Ideologies, Gashia, Google [Bot], Horvat, Hurdergaryp, Minoa, Nu Elysium, Outer Sparta, Statesburg, Tungstan, Uan aa Boa, Vologda State, Worms-sovereignty was never ceded
Advertisement