ALLIANCE OF CHRISTIAN NATIONS

by **Missourian Rebels** » Thu Oct 28, 2010 7:38 pm

Fine, deleted it from the Post, don't make a federal case out of an application for an alliance on a game, I mean seriously, I could take on so many people based on your reasoning, do I, no! because I don't get serious OVER A GAME, I MEAN SERIOUSLY! IT'S A GAME, NOT A SCHOOL REPORT, NOT A SONG, NOT A VIDEO, NOT A BOOK, NOT A FREAKING DOCUMENT, A FREAKING GAME, I MEAN SERIOUSLY, A GAME, WHY GET SO FREAKIN SERIOUS OVER A GAME, YOU PEOPLE MUST HAVE NO LIFE IF YOU WORRY THAT MUCH ABOUT A GAME

by **Missourian Rebels** » Thu Oct 28, 2010 7:47 pm

Ceannairceach wrote:From: The Great Celtic Federation of Ceannairceach, Grand Chancellor Markus Lindon
To: Whom it may concern in this Christian Alliance
Subject: Question and slight praise

Well, it appears that once again nations of the world rally around a single religion and cause, in this case that of your Holy Father and his son your savior Jesus Christ. Whilst I am normally opposed to this sort of alliance, usually on the grounds that they are filled with religious bigots that launch Holy Wars every five seconds against the "blasphemous nonbelievers", I must admit, this group seems generally tolerant. Although, while I trust the current members to do what is right on most issues, I still doubt it will remain the peaceful defensive alliance forever...

Onto my questions, however. For one, and the one that is burning down the halls of my mind to be answered, is what sect of Christianity are you? Baptist? Independent? Unitarian? Universal? Anglican? I must admit to some biased views here. Most Christian alliances have been strictly Catholic, or any other denomination. It is quite hard to maintain a universal Christian alliance, due to its many sects. The Muslims and Buddhists and other religions have easier times going about such, as they are relatively smaller in sect number and therefore more accepting of other sects. Usually.

Secondly, I noticed you made a loophole about creating an invasive coalition were the majority of your member nations willing too. This seems terribly biased. As you must know, some Christians are more eccentric and extreme than most (A name that comes to mind are the small sect of Westboro baptists in our own nation), and would most likely vote in any way possible to go to war against Communist, or Islamic, or otherwise against Christian nations. How would you combat this? It seems like quite a loophole, were you to ask me.

Nest, what is this alliances opinions on taboo subjects that are controversial in Christianity, such as homosexuality or polygamy or other religions or female priests or the afterlife and how it is obtained? Such are vital, in my grand chancellor-ly opinion, vital to the construction of any theocratic groups ideals and stances.

Either way, best of luck in this endeavor. they say in my own religion, may the universe, the fates, and all other divine and natural beings look kindly too you.

Grand Chancellor Markus A. Lindon

We're a Non-Denomination Christian Alliance

by **Shazbotdom** » Fri Oct 29, 2010 6:33 am

Missourian Rebels wrote:Fine, deleted it from the Post, don't make a federal case out of an application for an alliance on a game, I mean seriously, I could take on so many people based on your reasoning, do I, no! because I don't get serious OVER A GAME, I MEAN SERIOUSLY! IT'S A GAME, NOT A SCHOOL REPORT, NOT A SONG, NOT A VIDEO, NOT A BOOK, NOT A FREAKING DOCUMENT, A FREAKING GAME, I MEAN SERIOUSLY, A GAME, WHY GET SO FREAKIN SERIOUS OVER A GAME, YOU PEOPLE MUST HAVE NO LIFE IF YOU WORRY THAT MUCH ABOUT A GAME

OOC:
Copywrite law is very specific. If you create it, it is yours by law. One needs to request permission before using anything that is not their orriginal work, including stuff on an internet forum. Also, lay off the caps lock, 'yelling' at someone on here is taking it rather seriously.

by **Lithatrius** » Fri Oct 29, 2010 6:50 am

Nation's Full Name: The Theological Nation of Lithatrius
Nation's Leader & Title: Cardinal Petr Polikarpov
Nation's Government Type: Theological Dictatorship
Nation's Population: (RPd) 2.35 billion
Nation's Top Military Leader (Name & Rank): Field Marshall Nikolai Smyslov
Nation's Civil Rights: Some
Nation's Economic Level: Strong
Nation's Political Freedom: Rare
Nation's Currency Name: Lithatria
Nation's Gross Domestic Product (GDP): 20,316,275,522,866.42 (20 trillion)

Choose One Answer in Each of the Following...
1. Which of the following areas do you most enjoy writing in?
[ ] - Diplomacy Threads
[x] - War Threads
[ ] - Economic Treads or Storefronts
[x] - Alliance Building
[x] - NationStates Sports
[ ] - Multiple / All of the Above / No Preference

2. Which of the following areas do you like the best?
[ ] - I enjoy writing about my Air Force.
[ ] - I enjoy writing about my Army.
[ ] - I enjoy writing about my Navy.
[ ] - I enjoy writing about my Special Forces.
[x] - I enjoy writing about non-military things.

3. If given the choice, what would you prefer to do most?
[ ] - I would rather create treaties and charters.
[ ] - I would rather create a war thread or an invasion post.
[ ] - I would rather help organize alliances or groups.
[ ] - I have no real preference.
EXTRA: [x] - I would like to be involved as the ACN ambassador and recruitment leader.

by **ServoDroid Inc** » Fri Oct 29, 2010 1:18 pm

Missourian Rebels wrote:Fine, deleted it from the Post, don't make a federal case out of an application for an alliance on a game, I mean seriously, I could take on so many people based on your reasoning, do I, no! because I don't get serious OVER A GAME, I MEAN SERIOUSLY! IT'S A GAME, NOT A SCHOOL REPORT, NOT A SONG, NOT A VIDEO, NOT A BOOK, NOT A FREAKING DOCUMENT, A FREAKING GAME, I MEAN SERIOUSLY, A GAME, WHY GET SO FREAKIN SERIOUS OVER A GAME, YOU PEOPLE MUST HAVE NO LIFE IF YOU WORRY THAT MUCH ABOUT A GAME

OOC: Dude, chillout. Why you get so freakin mad over Criticism? Criticism is good to help correct your mistakes and do it right.

by **Ceannairceach** » Fri Oct 29, 2010 2:18 pm

Missourian Rebels wrote:We're a Non-Denomination Christian Alliance

From: The Great Celtic Federation of Ceannairceach, Grand Chancellor Markus Lindon
To: Whom it may concern in this Christian Alliance
Subject: Question and slight praise

Sir, this short note hardly answers my other questions. While I thank you for that answer, I would also wish you to answer my question about your loophole and the Alliances opinions on controversial opinions related to Christianity.

by **New Hayesalia** » Fri Oct 29, 2010 2:53 pm

Missourian Rebels wrote:Fine, deleted it from the Post, don't make a federal case out of an application for an alliance on a game, I mean seriously, I could take on so many people based on your reasoning, do I, no! because I don't get serious OVER A GAME, I MEAN SERIOUSLY! IT'S A GAME, NOT A SCHOOL REPORT, NOT A SONG, NOT A VIDEO, NOT A BOOK, NOT A FREAKING DOCUMENT, A FREAKING GAME, I MEAN SERIOUSLY, A GAME, WHY GET SO FREAKIN SERIOUS OVER A GAME, YOU PEOPLE MUST HAVE NO LIFE IF YOU WORRY THAT MUCH ABOUT A GAME

MR, lets put it in perspective. That applicaton was copied and pasted, and it is obviously one that has had a lot of thought put into it. What people have copyright issues with you? There are tgs, mods, threads, ou should bring it up. Secondly, you may not get serious over NationStates, which is a shame what with all your "Hyper-Hornets" and whatnot.

NationStates is a serious game to some people, because it creates a universe where you have free reign. I challenge you to find any site like this.

Thirdly, you need to cool down and swallow your pride. Straight-up, you are one of the WORST RPers I have seen in a very long time. Take your factbook, for example. Before I went in there and literally GAVE you the numbers you should have, you were claiming millions of aircraft. Not realistic. At least two other people said that to you.

Fourthly, stop going aggro. You can't just be a newb about it when you lose a plane by saying "oh yeah but my planes have jammers so you cant use yur missiles". Work on your grammar, take the criticism. Look at my first posts, now look at my latest posts. If someone asks you not to bring soldiers to a gala, by the way, don't sneak in a platoon of special forces. You have no requirement to die.

And lastly, copyright is an issue. Copyright, by the way, is not just a slip of paper claiming royalties, but an authors work. I don't see people around stealing posts and changing words around to suit their needs (I use my own posts for that), but a good RP is hard, and I don't want Jackie Mc2010 here stealing them. Ask and credit. Nobody minds if it's not your survey, as long as you credit the OP.

Thank you, and work on your grammar, and stop abusing your caps lock.

by **ServoDroid Inc** » Fri Oct 29, 2010 3:02 pm

New Hayesalia wrote:
Missourian Rebels wrote:Fine, deleted it from the Post, don't make a federal case out of an application for an alliance on a game, I mean seriously, I could take on so many people based on your reasoning, do I, no! because I don't get serious OVER A GAME, I MEAN SERIOUSLY! IT'S A GAME, NOT A SCHOOL REPORT, NOT A SONG, NOT A VIDEO, NOT A BOOK, NOT A FREAKING DOCUMENT, A FREAKING GAME, I MEAN SERIOUSLY, A GAME, WHY GET SO FREAKIN SERIOUS OVER A GAME, YOU PEOPLE MUST HAVE NO LIFE IF YOU WORRY THAT MUCH ABOUT A GAME

MR, lets put it in perspective. That applicaton was copied and pasted, and it is obviously one that has had a lot of thought put into it. What people have copyright issues with you? There are tgs, mods, threads, ou should bring it up. Secondly, you may not get serious over NationStates, which is a shame what with all your "Hyper-Hornets" and whatnot.

NationStates is a serious game to some people, because it creates a universe where you have free reign. I challenge you to find any site like this.

Thirdly, you need to cool down and swallow your pride. Straight-up, you are one of the WORST RPers I have seen in a very long time. Take your factbook, for example. Before I went in there and literally GAVE you the numbers you should have, you were claiming millions of aircraft. Not realistic. At least two other people said that to you.

Fourthly, stop going aggro. You can't just be a newb about it when you lose a plane by saying "oh yeah but my planes have jammers so you cant use yur missiles". Work on your grammar, take the criticism. Look at my first posts, now look at my latest posts. If someone asks you not to bring soldiers to a gala, by the way, don't sneak in a platoon of special forces. You have no requirement to die.

And lastly, copyright is an issue. Copyright, by the way, is not just a slip of paper claiming royalties, but an authors work. I don't see people around stealing posts and changing words around to suit their needs (I use my own posts for that), but a good RP is hard, and I don't want Jackie Mc2010 here stealing them. Ask and credit. Nobody minds if it's not your survey, as long as you credit the OP.

Thank you, and work on your grammar, and stop abusing your caps lock.

I agree with EVERYTHING New Hayesalia has just posted.

by **Hornopolis** » Fri Oct 29, 2010 3:07 pm

Missourian Rebels wrote:Fine, deleted it from the Post, don't make a federal case out of an application for an alliance on a game, I mean seriously, I could take on so many people based on your reasoning, do I, no! because I don't get serious OVER A GAME, I MEAN SERIOUSLY! IT'S A GAME, NOT A SCHOOL REPORT, NOT A SONG, NOT A VIDEO, NOT A BOOK, NOT A FREAKING DOCUMENT, A FREAKING GAME, I MEAN SERIOUSLY, A GAME, WHY GET SO FREAKIN SERIOUS OVER A GAME, YOU PEOPLE MUST HAVE NO LIFE IF YOU WORRY THAT MUCH ABOUT A GAME

Swell, you've taken down New Azura's application. I believe this is a good lesson for you MR, is it not?

by **Sailsia** » Fri Oct 29, 2010 8:47 pm

Missourian Rebels wrote:Fine, deleted it from the Post, don't make a federal case out of an application for an alliance on a game, I mean seriously, I could take on so many people based on your reasoning, do I, no! because I don't get serious OVER A GAME, I MEAN SERIOUSLY! IT'S A GAME, NOT A SCHOOL REPORT, NOT A SONG, NOT A VIDEO, NOT A BOOK, NOT A FREAKING DOCUMENT, A FREAKING GAME, I MEAN SERIOUSLY, A GAME, WHY GET SO FREAKIN SERIOUS OVER A GAME, YOU PEOPLE MUST HAVE NO LIFE IF YOU WORRY THAT MUCH ABOUT A GAME

by **New Hayesalia** » Sat Oct 30, 2010 2:46 am

Sailsia wrote:
Missourian Rebels wrote:Fine, deleted it from the Post, don't make a federal case out of an application for an alliance on a game, I mean seriously, I could take on so many people based on your reasoning, do I, no! because I don't get serious OVER A GAME, I MEAN SERIOUSLY! IT'S A GAME, NOT A SCHOOL REPORT, NOT A SONG, NOT A VIDEO, NOT A BOOK, NOT A FREAKING DOCUMENT, A FREAKING GAME, I MEAN SERIOUSLY, A GAME, WHY GET SO FREAKIN SERIOUS OVER A GAME, YOU PEOPLE MUST HAVE NO LIFE IF YOU WORRY THAT MUCH ABOUT A GAME

May I please ask, if it's only a game, why did you get so angry? And no, it isn't JUST a game for a lot of people. It is a place where they can express themselves through writing, debate, ect. The fact is, Solm and New Azura are veterans of NationStates, and therefor, have a higher prestige and influence then yourself. I have NO idea if a new nation will be RP'ing 3 months from now, but I KNOW Solm will be, and so do others. That means we all have to respect one another, and if you plagiarized something, fess up to it, give credit to the original creator, and ask for permission next time. Its very simple, and not hard at all. There are SO many stikies to help your RP'ing, in fact, I will give you all the ones I have bookmarked:
http://forum.nationstates.net/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=12342
viewtopic.php?f=5&t=69551
viewtopic.php?f=5&t=3010
viewtopic.php?f=5&t=50482
viewtopic.php?f=5&t=58855
viewtopic.php?f=5&t=42611
viewtopic.php?f=5&t=24210
viewtopic.php?f=5&t=16666

And WIKIPEDIA IS YOUR FRIEND! I can't stress that enough!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/War
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Armed_forces
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Military_organization
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aerial_warfare
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Information_warfare
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Land_warfare
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naval_warfare
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Space_warfare
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Industrial_warfare
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Modern_warfare
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Attrition_warfare
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maneuver_warfare
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Counter-insurgency
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economic_warfare
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operational_mobility
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Military_rank
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Command_an ... _(military)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Staff_(military)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Military_intelligence
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Military_t ... _equipment
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Materiel
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Military_s ... management
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lists_of_weapons
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_an ... ft_weapons
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_missiles
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_rockets
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jungle_warfare
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Urban_warfare
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Desert_warfare
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mountain_warfare
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arctic_warfare
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/War_economy
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/War_effort
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mobilization

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superpower
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democracy
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Authoritarianism
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Communism
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fascism
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_Development_Index
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gini_coefficient

You now have ALL the resources you need, now go out there and get WRITING! You have all the information you need.

And finally, should all else fail, we will enact a condemnation act.

by **Holy Roman Confederate** » Sat Oct 30, 2010 3:36 am

After stumbling upon this thread I must say it was worth finding. Missourian Rebel's is once again a source of mild amusement for me. Perhaps he'll manage to wrestle control of the caps lock key away from the poorly spoken rube that seem's to be using his account on a daily basis.

by **The Batorys** » Sat Oct 30, 2010 3:48 am

Now now, the silly little Christians have every right to make an alliance, despite the rather brash words of the representative from Missourian Rebels.

by **Holy Roman Confederate** » Sat Oct 30, 2010 3:49 am

Would anyone like a nice warm plate of religious ferver?

by **New Hayesalia** » Sat Oct 30, 2010 10:54 pm

Holy Roman Confederate wrote:Would anyone like a nice warm plate of religious ferver?

With a cool glass of intolerance?

by **North Breifne** » Sun Oct 31, 2010 8:04 am

In order to rekindle this idea of a genuinely tolerant Christian Defensive Alliance under more able leadership, I would like to propose a new sign-up before establishing the thread to avoid the controversy that has surrounded this thread so:

Code: Select all: Nation Name: Official Government Type: Main Christian Denomination: Leader's Name and Official Title: Representative to the Alliance: Religion and Spirituality Budget: Gross Domestic Product: Civil Rights Rating: Population:

by **The Papal City** » Mon Nov 01, 2010 11:06 am

The Papal City wrote:
The Papal City wrote:Choose One Answer in Each of the Following...
Nation's Full Name: The Dominion of the Papal City (most commonly refered to as the Holy See or the Holy City)
Nation's Leader & Title: His Holliness Pope John Paul III, Father of Princes and Kings, Ruler of the World, Vicar of our Savior Jesus Christ in earth
Nation's Government Type: Theocracy
Nation's Population: Insignificant (represent an unregistered number of catholics estimated to be above 2bn)
Nation's Top Military Leader (Name & Rank): Police Commisionary Gregorius Cortez
Nation's Civil Rights: Some
Nation's Economic Level: Very strong
Nation's Political Freedom: Rare
Nation's Currency Name: Varresan Crowns
Nation's Gross Domestic Product (GDP): Minimal

1. Which of the following areas do you most enjoy writing in?
[ ] - Diplomacy Threads
[ ] - War Threads
[ ] - Economic Treads or Storefronts
[ ] - Alliance Building
[ ] - NationStates Sports
[X] - Multiple / All of the Above / No Preference

2. Which of the following areas do you like the best?
[ ] - I enjoy writing about my Air Force.
[ ] - I enjoy writing about my Army.
[ ] - I enjoy writing about my Navy.
[ ] - I enjoy writing about my Special Forces.
[ ] - I enjoy writing about non-military things.
Indifferent

3. If given the choice, what would you prefer to do most?
[ ] - I would rather create treaties and charters.
[ ] - I would rather create a war thread or an invasion post.
[ ] - I would rather help organize alliances or groups.
[X] - I have no real preference.

OOC: As this nation is the puppet for a catholic breakaway church I was wondering if perhaps the Papal City could become an honorary member? If so I would be happy to negotiate about it.

Bump?

Third time is the charm

by **Lineale** » Tue Nov 02, 2010 4:27 pm

Friends, I believe that I may soon begin my own Christian Alliance of Inter-Denomination. If you would like to join me, please TG me soon.

by **New Hayesalia** » Tue Nov 02, 2010 11:25 pm

http://forum.nationstates.net/viewtopic.php?f=24&t=77847&start=0

Sorry 'bout this, boys and girls.

by **Landstown** » Wed Nov 03, 2010 4:21 am

I want to reply wat do i do?

by **Lineale** » Wed Nov 03, 2010 4:38 pm

Alrighty: I am officially beginning my own Alliance. It will take the pieces of this Alliance and re-assemble it, except without Missourian Rebels as its leader. I believe that a nation like this is not capable of this amount of power. If you are with me, and have already been accepted into this Alliance, I will have you fill out a small form stating your national belief system, and I will most likely accept you (unless your some fringe Buddhist group).

Please pop in here: The Grand Inter-Denominational Alliance of Christian States

ALLIANCE OF CHRISTIAN NATIONS

Who is online