Freisharf wrote:BTR-152? I like
Did not know of the BTR-152 before you showed me, but yes, like a BTR-152 on steroids and a sumo wrestler's diet.
Advertisement
by The Anglo-Saxon Empire » Tue Nov 02, 2010 12:47 pm
Freisharf wrote:BTR-152? I like
by The Anglo-Saxon Empire » Tue Nov 02, 2010 12:50 pm
Altamirus wrote:The Anglo-Saxon Empire wrote:You should be excited, one vehicle cheaper than a Stryker that can carry almost a whole company, and has the firepower of a dozen APCs. I could actually imagine you fitting more like 30 infantry on the Warbus.
Warbus+(4x12.7x99mm machine guns)+(30x(infantry+Milkor MGL)=Win
How much?
by The Anglo-Saxon Empire » Tue Nov 02, 2010 12:53 pm
by Of The Arch ilands » Tue Nov 02, 2010 2:59 pm
Xiscapia wrote:In Soviet Archland, OH SHIT FRANK IS BEHIND YOU!
18:47 Urarailgun In heaven the cooks are Archian, the engineers are Urarailian, the lovers are Delemontian, and the police are Britannian. In hell the cooks are Britannian, the engineers are Delemontian, the lovers are Archian, and the police are Urarailian
by L3 Communications » Tue Nov 02, 2010 3:01 pm
New Nicksyllvania wrote:WA is jew infested tyranny that does not understand freedom and 0% taxation
Lyras wrote:Thirdly, the inclusion of multiple penetration aids (such as flares, chaff, false-target balloons and lubricant)...
by Wolohanistan » Tue Nov 02, 2010 3:06 pm
L3 Communications wrote:The Anglo-Saxon Empire wrote:Oh, how much does it cost. A quick guess, about $500,000, maybe as high as $1 million each, which is still far less than a Stryker.
And far less armoured, mobile, or maneuverable to boot. Not only that, but it's also less strategically mobile, since it's probably twice as long as a Stryker.
by L3 Communications » Tue Nov 02, 2010 3:11 pm
New Nicksyllvania wrote:WA is jew infested tyranny that does not understand freedom and 0% taxation
Lyras wrote:Thirdly, the inclusion of multiple penetration aids (such as flares, chaff, false-target balloons and lubricant)...
by Satirius » Tue Nov 02, 2010 4:04 pm
L3 Communications wrote:The Anglo-Saxon Empire wrote:Oh, how much does it cost. A quick guess, about $500,000, maybe as high as $1 million each, which is still far less than a Stryker.
And far less armoured, mobile, or maneuverable to boot. Not only that, but it's also less strategically mobile, since it's probably twice as long as a Stryker.
by L3 Communications » Tue Nov 02, 2010 4:12 pm
Satirius wrote:L3 Communications wrote:
And far less armoured, mobile, or maneuverable to boot. Not only that, but it's also less strategically mobile, since it's probably twice as long as a Stryker.
Still a great replacement for trains where there are no trains
don't expect them to be used in Spizania or anything tho
New Nicksyllvania wrote:WA is jew infested tyranny that does not understand freedom and 0% taxation
Lyras wrote:Thirdly, the inclusion of multiple penetration aids (such as flares, chaff, false-target balloons and lubricant)...
by Satirius » Tue Nov 02, 2010 4:20 pm
by The Anglo-Saxon Empire » Tue Nov 02, 2010 4:39 pm
L3 Communications wrote:The Anglo-Saxon Empire wrote:Oh, how much does it cost. A quick guess, about $500,000, maybe as high as $1 million each, which is still far less than a Stryker.
And far less armoured, mobile, or maneuverable to boot. Not only that, but it's also less strategically mobile, since it's probably twice as long as a Stryker.
by Wolohanistan » Tue Nov 02, 2010 4:41 pm
by The Anglo-Saxon Empire » Tue Nov 02, 2010 4:54 pm
Wolohanistan wrote:I'd buy it.
IC'ly it would probably be purchased by city based militias.
by Fashiontopia » Tue Nov 02, 2010 4:56 pm
by Satirius » Tue Nov 02, 2010 5:57 pm
Fashiontopia wrote:Yall need'da chill out... haha
4 M113s vs. 1 Warbus... we would Flank your asses out. Plus if I get one of the M113 Mortar Carrier variants I can have rear artillery support thats MOBILE... you're done...
by The Anglo-Saxon Empire » Tue Nov 02, 2010 6:19 pm
Fashiontopia wrote:Yall need'da chill out... haha
4 M113s vs. 1 Warbus... we would Flank your asses out. Plus if I get one of the M113 Mortar Carrier variants I can have rear artillery support thats MOBILE... you're done...
by L3 Communications » Tue Nov 02, 2010 6:31 pm
The Anglo-Saxon Empire wrote:Fashiontopia wrote:Yall need'da chill out... haha
4 M113s vs. 1 Warbus... we would Flank your asses out. Plus if I get one of the M113 Mortar Carrier variants I can have rear artillery support thats MOBILE... you're done...
Try and flank the Warbus and get shot up by a couple dozen guys with Milkor MGLs, or some other support weapon. Hell, I could probably put a few guys with RPGs and have a ghetto tank destroyer.
Here is how the scenario would happen. Your M113s attempt to outflank the Warbus, but whenever they come within eye shot of it they get a dozen rocket propelled grenades up their ass. Or the Warbus could use the 50 soldiers inside to scout ahead and use the Warbus as a mobile fire support base. Best of all, since the Warbus has a huge roof you could probably place a few mortars on it.
Also, the Warbus was initially a joke, but I might decide to make it more practical.
New Nicksyllvania wrote:WA is jew infested tyranny that does not understand freedom and 0% taxation
Lyras wrote:Thirdly, the inclusion of multiple penetration aids (such as flares, chaff, false-target balloons and lubricant)...
by Fashiontopia » Tue Nov 02, 2010 6:38 pm
L3 Communications wrote:The Anglo-Saxon Empire wrote:Try and flank the Warbus and get shot up by a couple dozen guys with Milkor MGLs, or some other support weapon. Hell, I could probably put a few guys with RPGs and have a ghetto tank destroyer.
Here is how the scenario would happen. Your M113s attempt to outflank the Warbus, but whenever they come within eye shot of it they get a dozen rocket propelled grenades up their ass. Or the Warbus could use the 50 soldiers inside to scout ahead and use the Warbus as a mobile fire support base. Best of all, since the Warbus has a huge roof you could probably place a few mortars on it.
Also, the Warbus was initially a joke, but I might decide to make it more practical.
Backblast.
by Satirius » Tue Nov 02, 2010 6:48 pm
L3 Communications wrote:The Anglo-Saxon Empire wrote:Try and flank the Warbus and get shot up by a couple dozen guys with Milkor MGLs, or some other support weapon. Hell, I could probably put a few guys with RPGs and have a ghetto tank destroyer.
Here is how the scenario would happen. Your M113s attempt to outflank the Warbus, but whenever they come within eye shot of it they get a dozen rocket propelled grenades up their ass. Or the Warbus could use the 50 soldiers inside to scout ahead and use the Warbus as a mobile fire support base. Best of all, since the Warbus has a huge roof you could probably place a few mortars on it.
Also, the Warbus was initially a joke, but I might decide to make it more practical.
Backblast.
by Phonencia » Tue Nov 02, 2010 6:50 pm
by Satirius » Tue Nov 02, 2010 6:54 pm
by Fashiontopia » Tue Nov 02, 2010 7:02 pm
by Satirius » Tue Nov 02, 2010 7:05 pm
Fashiontopia wrote:Remember how in World War II the Germans used Flak 88's?
Why don't I just commit millions of dollars to converting Flak guns to Anti-Tank guns and kick your warbuses asses with 88mm Direct Fire from 1 Mile away...
by L3 Communications » Tue Nov 02, 2010 7:30 pm
New Nicksyllvania wrote:WA is jew infested tyranny that does not understand freedom and 0% taxation
Lyras wrote:Thirdly, the inclusion of multiple penetration aids (such as flares, chaff, false-target balloons and lubricant)...
Advertisement
Return to Factbooks and National Information
Advertisement