My friend, I'm not playing this game with you.
Advertisement
by Sundiata » Thu Mar 19, 2020 6:45 pm
by The New California Republic » Thu Mar 19, 2020 6:47 pm
by Cisairse » Thu Mar 19, 2020 6:47 pm
Polding wrote:The New California Republic wrote:Words have meanings, and using a word incorrectly—either accidentally or in order to evoke an emotion that otherwise wouldn't be evoked in the event of using the correct word—should be avoided.
People have been calling unborn babies children for longer than I have been born, I’m not apologetic for not being annally precise.
by Austria-Bohemia-Hungary » Thu Mar 19, 2020 6:48 pm
by Austria-Bohemia-Hungary » Thu Mar 19, 2020 6:50 pm
by Albrenia » Thu Mar 19, 2020 6:50 pm
by The New California Republic » Thu Mar 19, 2020 6:50 pm
by New haven america » Thu Mar 19, 2020 6:51 pm
Polding wrote:The New California Republic wrote:Words have meanings, and using a word incorrectly—either accidentally or in order to evoke an emotion that otherwise wouldn't be evoked in the event of using the correct word—should be avoided.
People have been calling unborn babies children for longer than I have been born, I’m not apologetic for not being annally precise.
by New haven america » Thu Mar 19, 2020 6:53 pm
by Neanderthaland » Thu Mar 19, 2020 6:53 pm
by Cisairse » Thu Mar 19, 2020 6:53 pm
Austria-Bohemia-Hungary wrote:What's the political views of the pre-birth demographic anyway?
by Polding » Thu Mar 19, 2020 6:54 pm
by New haven america » Thu Mar 19, 2020 6:57 pm
Polding wrote:The New California Republic wrote:Wrong. Children have been born. Fetuses that have not been born are not children. Abortion affects fetuses, not children. Ergo, your statement that Kat supports the murder of children is inaccurate.
Fetuses are human, the distinction that humans must be born to be human is entirely arbitrary (how does birth confer ‘human-ness’?). Ergo, Kat. believes that it is perfectly fine to murder humans in their infancy, which are called ‘babies’ and ‘children’ because most people aren’t anal-retentive and fetuses are so near children that they will be children if they weren’t aborted.
by Polding » Thu Mar 19, 2020 6:58 pm
New haven america wrote:Polding wrote:Fetuses are human, the distinction that humans must be born to be human is entirely arbitrary (how does birth confer ‘human-ness’?). Ergo, Kat. believes that it is perfectly fine to murder humans in their infancy, which are called ‘babies’ and ‘children’ because most people aren’t anal-retentive and fetuses are so near children that they will be children if they weren’t aborted.
You're skin cells are human too.
So anytime you take a bath or shower you're committing genocide by allowed your skin cells to fall off your body.
by Godular » Thu Mar 19, 2020 6:58 pm
Polding wrote:The New California Republic wrote:Wrong. Children have been born. Fetuses that have not been born are not children. Abortion affects fetuses, not children. Ergo, your statement that Kat supports the murder of children is inaccurate.
Fetuses are human, the distinction that humans must be born to be human is entirely arbitrary (how does birth confer ‘human-ness’?). Ergo, Kat. believes that it is perfectly fine to murder humans in their infancy, which are called ‘babies’ and ‘children’ because most people aren’t anal-retentive and fetuses are so near children that they will be children if they weren’t aborted.
by New haven america » Thu Mar 19, 2020 6:58 pm
by Neanderthaland » Thu Mar 19, 2020 6:59 pm
by Necroghastia » Thu Mar 19, 2020 7:00 pm
Polding wrote:The New California Republic wrote:Wrong. Children have been born. Fetuses that have not been born are not children. Abortion affects fetuses, not children. Ergo, your statement that Kat supports the murder of children is inaccurate.
Fetuses are human, the distinction that humans must be born to be human is entirely arbitrary (how does birth confer ‘human-ness’?).
Ergo, Kat. believes that it is perfectly fine to murder humans in their infancy, which are called ‘babies’ and ‘children’ because most people aren’t anal-retentive and fetuses are so near children that they will be children if they weren’t aborted.
by Celritannia » Thu Mar 19, 2020 7:00 pm
Polding wrote:The New California Republic wrote:Wrong. Children have been born. Fetuses that have not been born are not children. Abortion affects fetuses, not children. Ergo, your statement that Kat supports the murder of children is inaccurate.
Fetuses are human, the distinction that humans must be born to be human is entirely arbitrary (how does birth confer ‘human-ness’?). Ergo, Kat. believes that it is perfectly fine to murder humans in their infancy, which are called ‘babies’ and ‘children’ because most people aren’t anal-retentive and fetuses are so near children that they will be children if they weren’t aborted.
My DeviantArt Obey When you annoy a Celritannian U W0T M8?
| Citizen of Earth, Commonwealthian, European, British, Yorkshireman. Atheist, Environmentalist |
by Farnhamia » Thu Mar 19, 2020 7:00 pm
by Necroghastia » Thu Mar 19, 2020 7:01 pm
by Necroghastia » Thu Mar 19, 2020 7:02 pm
by Godular » Thu Mar 19, 2020 7:02 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Dazchan, Floofybit, Godular, Homalia, Kubra, Likhinia, New Temecula, Saiwana, Theodorable
Advertisement