I said "true" in reference to the behavior of promiscuous men. Man or woman, promiscuous behavior is not good.
I'm not shaming the people, just the behavior.
Advertisement
by Sundiata » Thu Mar 19, 2020 6:19 pm
by Necroghastia » Thu Mar 19, 2020 6:20 pm
Sundiata wrote:The New California Republic wrote:Wrong. You agreed with the slut shaming statement by saying "true", so stop trying to gaslight me.
I said "true" in reference to the behavior of promiscuous men. Man or woman, promiscuous behavior is not good.
I'm not shaming the people, just the behavior.
by Polding » Thu Mar 19, 2020 6:21 pm
by The New California Republic » Thu Mar 19, 2020 6:23 pm
Sundiata wrote:The New California Republic wrote:Wrong. You agreed with the slut shaming statement by saying "true", so stop trying to gaslight me.
I said "true" in reference to the behavior of promiscuous men. Man or woman, promiscuous behavior is not good.
I'm not shaming the people, just the behavior.
by The New California Republic » Thu Mar 19, 2020 6:25 pm
by Necroghastia » Thu Mar 19, 2020 6:26 pm
by Cisairse » Thu Mar 19, 2020 6:27 pm
by Sundiata » Thu Mar 19, 2020 6:28 pm
The New California Republic wrote:Sundiata wrote:I said "true" in reference to the behavior of promiscuous men. Man or woman, promiscuous behavior is not good.
I'm not shaming the people, just the behavior.
No you didn't. This is what you said:Sundiata wrote:True, promiscuity is always shameful.
The quote you were replying to was explicitly about slut shaming men as well as women. The only, only, possible meaning of that "true" in that response was that you agree that both men and women should be slut shamed.
by The New California Republic » Thu Mar 19, 2020 6:29 pm
In determining the meaning of any Act of Congress, or of any ruling, regulation, or interpretation of the various administrative bureaus and agencies of the United States, the words “person”, “human being”, “child”, and “individual”, shall include every infant member of the species homo sapiens who is born alive at any stage of development.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/1/8
by Polding » Thu Mar 19, 2020 6:29 pm
The New California Republic wrote:Polding wrote:Unborn babies? Fellow human beings that are yet to be birthed? It doesn’t change anything.
Words have meanings, and using a word incorrectly—either accidentally or in order to evoke an emotion that otherwise wouldn't be evoked in the event of using the correct word—should be avoided.
by The New California Republic » Thu Mar 19, 2020 6:30 pm
Sundiata wrote:The New California Republic wrote:No you didn't. This is what you said:
The quote you were replying to was explicitly about slut shaming men as well as women. The only, only, possible meaning of that "true" in that response was that you agree that both men and women should be slut shamed.
I've consistently stated that promiscuity should not be tolerated for men or women, however, I elaborated my position further by explicitly stating that the people who behave in such a manner are not be judged by us.
In other words, this is a nothing burger.
by Polding » Thu Mar 19, 2020 6:31 pm
The New California Republic wrote:Necroghastia wrote:"Unborn babies" is a non-sequitur. It's like saying "multicellular bacteria."
Even calling a fetus a human being is questionable:In determining the meaning of any Act of Congress, or of any ruling, regulation, or interpretation of the various administrative bureaus and agencies of the United States, the words “person”, “human being”, “child”, and “individual”, shall include every infant member of the species homo sapiens who is born alive at any stage of development.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/1/8
by Polding » Thu Mar 19, 2020 6:31 pm
by Sundiata » Thu Mar 19, 2020 6:33 pm
The New California Republic wrote:Sundiata wrote:I've consistently stated that promiscuity should not be tolerated for men or women, however, I elaborated my position further by explicitly stating that the people who behave in such a manner are not be judged by us.
In other words, this is a nothing burger.
So that "true" that you threw in there was essentially meaningless? O...kay...
by Necroghastia » Thu Mar 19, 2020 6:33 pm
by The New California Republic » Thu Mar 19, 2020 6:33 pm
Polding wrote:The New California Republic wrote:Words have meanings, and using a word incorrectly—either accidentally or in order to evoke an emotion that otherwise wouldn't be evoked in the event of using the correct word—should be avoided.
People have been calling unborn babies children for longer than I have been born, I’m not apologetic for not being annally precise.
by Polding » Thu Mar 19, 2020 6:38 pm
The New California Republic wrote:Polding wrote:People have been calling unborn babies children for longer than I have been born, I’m not apologetic for not being annally precise.
If you use words incorrectly then expect to be repeatedly called out on it, as it has happened many times in the previous abortion-related threads, as imprecision with word usage has repeatedly caused all sorts of issues.
by New haven america » Thu Mar 19, 2020 6:38 pm
by The New California Republic » Thu Mar 19, 2020 6:39 pm
Polding wrote:The New California Republic wrote:If you use words incorrectly then expect to be repeatedly called out on it, as it has happened many times in the previous abortion-related threads, as imprecision with word usage has repeatedly caused all sorts of issues.
Expect me not to care if what I say accurately describes the subject.
by Polding » Thu Mar 19, 2020 6:39 pm
by Necroghastia » Thu Mar 19, 2020 6:39 pm
Polding wrote:The New California Republic wrote:If you use words incorrectly then expect to be repeatedly called out on it, as it has happened many times in the previous abortion-related threads, as imprecision with word usage has repeatedly caused all sorts of issues.
Expect me not to care if what I say accurately describes the subject.
Necroghastia wrote:Babies have been born, though.
That is a totally arbitrary distinction that doesn’t make any sense.
by Austria-Bohemia-Hungary » Thu Mar 19, 2020 6:40 pm
by The New California Republic » Thu Mar 19, 2020 6:41 pm
by Godular » Thu Mar 19, 2020 6:43 pm
Polding wrote:The New California Republic wrote:Words have meanings, and using a word incorrectly—either accidentally or in order to evoke an emotion that otherwise wouldn't be evoked in the event of using the correct word—should be avoided.
People have been calling unborn babies children for longer than I have been born, I’m not apologetic for not being annally precise.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Al-Haqiqah, Angora Guanaco, Apexiala, BEEstreetz, Daphomir, Eastoria, Elejamie, Galatia-, Hekp, Hidrandia, High Earth, Kareniya, Likhinia, Plan Neonie, Simonia, Squirreltopia, Statesburg, Styldavia, Tundra Terra, Tungstan, Umeria
Advertisement