Advertisement
by Garyopolis » Tue Feb 04, 2020 1:38 pm
by Separatist Peoples » Tue Feb 04, 2020 1:41 pm
Garyopolis wrote:And I believe that I am in violation of GA#438, because of a capital punishment decision I made long ago. Am I in trouble, until I get an issue where I can repeal it?
by The World Capitalist Confederation » Tue Feb 04, 2020 2:00 pm
by Bananaistan » Tue Feb 04, 2020 2:06 pm
The World Capitalist Confederation wrote:Is it legal to have a "series" of resolutions? Of course, each one would be standalone and make little reference to each other (and only make abstract references, rather than saying it as though it were approved), but each one would say something similar to
"International Convention on Examples Article 1"
"International Convention on Examples Article 2"
And so on..They would all be part of one coherent thing, but are standalone and can survive without each other, so the rest of the series would be fine if you got rid of, say, articles 1 and 3.
EDIT: The most illegal thing that might happen is the same organisation being used for more than one of them, but what will happen is this clause
"If the Example Committee of the International Convention on Examples does not exist by any prior act, then it shall be established by this act, with the following responsibilities..."
It would be put on every single one, as to ensure that the organisation would exist without the existence of all but one of the resolution series.
by The World Capitalist Confederation » Tue Feb 04, 2020 2:11 pm
Bananaistan wrote:The World Capitalist Confederation wrote:Is it legal to have a "series" of resolutions? Of course, each one would be standalone and make little reference to each other (and only make abstract references, rather than saying it as though it were approved), but each one would say something similar to
"International Convention on Examples Article 1"
"International Convention on Examples Article 2"
And so on..They would all be part of one coherent thing, but are standalone and can survive without each other, so the rest of the series would be fine if you got rid of, say, articles 1 and 3.
EDIT: The most illegal thing that might happen is the same organisation being used for more than one of them, but what will happen is this clause
"If the Example Committee of the International Convention on Examples does not exist by any prior act, then it shall be established by this act, with the following responsibilities..."
It would be put on every single one, as to ensure that the organisation would exist without the existence of all but one of the resolution series.
We can't rule on hypothetical questions but it wouldn't be too hard to word them legally and it has been done before. See for example GAR#217, 218 and 219/, or the "rules of war" resolutions that Separatist Peoples wrote. The key rule to watch out for is House of Cards. One resolution cannot rely on another but you seem to heading that way anyway.
Regarding your edit. It is common practice to reuse committees.
by Imperium Anglorum » Tue Feb 04, 2020 2:58 pm
by The World Capitalist Confederation » Tue Feb 04, 2020 3:03 pm
Imperium Anglorum wrote:Past them here. We have an existing set of legislation on tariffs other trade related things. They might be duplicatory or contradictory.
by Imperium Anglorum » Tue Feb 04, 2020 4:05 pm
by Araraukar » Thu Feb 06, 2020 4:53 pm
The World Capitalist Confederation wrote:Imperium Anglorum wrote:Past them here. We have an existing set of legislation on tariffs other trade related things. They might be duplicatory or contradictory.
I haven't done the meat yet. The first one will mostly be setting maximum tariffs, depending on industry and then with a bunch of exemptions such as trade sanctions, embargoes, etc...
Apologies for absences, non-COVID health issues leave me with very little energy at times.Giovenith wrote:And sorry hun, if you were looking for a forum site where nobody argued, you've come to wrong one.
by Verdant Haven » Sun Feb 09, 2020 6:39 am
by Separatist Peoples » Sun Feb 09, 2020 6:51 am
Verdant Haven wrote:How stringent is the rule "Proposals must use understandable English" when it comes to determining legality? Just curious, as four out of the five presently submitted and "legal" proposals are such butcheries of the language that they lack all meaning. The words are real, and one can generally figure out what the author probably intended to say, but between dropped words, incorrect usages, homophones, and missing possessives, these really aren't meaningful English.
I realize it would take a miracle for any of them to achieve quorum, and an even greater miracle for any of them to receive a positive vote. As such, I don't want to waste anybody's time posting them to the illegal resolutions thread if this wouldn't actually be sufficient basis for flagging them as illegal.
by The World Capitalist Confederation » Sun Feb 09, 2020 7:21 am
Imperium Anglorum wrote:https://forum.nationstates.net/viewtopic.php?f=9&t=30&p=10556924&hilit=Auralia+trade#p10556924
by Civitas Libertad » Tue Mar 03, 2020 2:13 pm
by Civitas Libertad » Tue Mar 03, 2020 2:13 pm
by Denathor » Tue Mar 03, 2020 2:19 pm
Civitas Libertad wrote:Does the World Assembly have any rules relating to child soldiers?
What are they?
by Tinhampton » Tue Mar 03, 2020 2:26 pm
Civitas Libertad wrote:Does the World Assembly have any rules relating to child soldiers?
What are they?
Civitas Libertad wrote:Do any laws regulate working conditions and/or pay?
by Civitas Libertad » Tue Mar 03, 2020 2:35 pm
by Civitas Libertad » Tue Mar 03, 2020 2:35 pm
Tinhampton wrote:Civitas Libertad wrote:Does the World Assembly have any rules relating to child soldiers?
What are they?
Thou shalt not use them.Civitas Libertad wrote:Do any laws regulate working conditions and/or pay?
A lot of them: GA#7 <<< this one especially!, GA#23, GA#43, GA#108(!), GA#179 (only regulating prostitutes), GA#302 (née HR#175), GA#344.
See also GA#35, where "unfair and unreasonable discrimination, on the grounds outlined in clause c) of article 1 of this resolution, in private employment... shall be prohibited by all member states."
Please refer to the pinned RexisQuexis before you ask such questions next time.
by Civitas Libertad » Tue Mar 03, 2020 2:45 pm
by Civitas Libertad » Tue Mar 03, 2020 2:49 pm
by Denathor » Tue Mar 03, 2020 3:26 pm
by Denathor » Tue Mar 03, 2020 5:45 pm
United States of Zambia wrote:How do I vote?
by Araraukar » Tue Mar 03, 2020 6:40 pm
Denathor wrote:United States of Zambia wrote:How do I vote?Hope this helps!
- Go to the settings screen on the left side of the page and enter your email if you haven’t already.
- Go to the link on the left side of the page labelled "World Assembly."
- Somewhere hear the top of the page should be a button labelled "join the World Assembly," or something similar.
- Hit the button, follow any relevant instructions and wait for the confirmation email.
- Follow the instructions on the confirmation email. Congratulations, you’ve just joined the WA!
Apologies for absences, non-COVID health issues leave me with very little energy at times.Giovenith wrote:And sorry hun, if you were looking for a forum site where nobody argued, you've come to wrong one.
by Wallenburg » Wed Mar 04, 2020 7:01 pm
Civitas Libertad wrote:Can i have the death penalty for the following?:
Offences against the person: kidnapping, rape, forced marriage, forced prostitution, child molestation
Offences against the state: treason,
Various military offences, bribery, gangsterism
Offences against property: armed robbery
Civitas Libertad wrote:
Ok. With regards “armed conflict” we comply with the letter though arguably not the spirit of that.
Still we need to completely overhaul the fast-food, retail, hospitality and mass-production industries.
Do full-time apprenticeships as a replacement for middle-school violate the “don’t interfere with education” clause?
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Tigrisia
Advertisement