Denathor wrote:
- Defines:
- an "aggressor" as a person who attempts to do physical harm to another person,
- the "act of reasonable defence" to be the use of force to protect any person from an act of unlawful violence or the reasonably perceived threat of an imminent act of unlawful violence,
OOC: So how is a person walking into a situation where someone is threatening another or even hitting another, supposed to know that the person being threatened is the original aggressor? Can they act to defend that person, even if the person they see as an aggressor, is acting according to this proposal? Can they both claim the defence - one of them of themself, the other of another person - as a legal defence and not be charged for battery/assault?