by Nocturnes rest » Fri Jan 24, 2020 8:30 pm
by Neutraligon » Fri Jan 24, 2020 8:34 pm
by Cetacea » Fri Jan 24, 2020 8:47 pm
- Chernobyl, Fukushima, and Three Mile Island are best considered anomalies
- Decommissioning is being ignored here
by Heloin » Fri Jan 24, 2020 9:31 pm
Cetacea wrote:You left out Hydro power which using modern verticle shaft turbines are less damaging to the environment and one of my favourite options.
I'm persoally a fan of Small scale Solar + Battery systems- Chernobyl, Fukushima, and Three Mile Island are best considered anomalies
- Decommissioning is being ignored here
I know Nuclear has a lot of things in its favour however the two things you list here are the very reasons why I dont like it. Three melt down incidents in less than 50 years isn't an anomaly its a pattern and decommissioning is a issues right up there with micro-plastic
by The Zravvisk » Fri Jan 24, 2020 9:36 pm
La Paz de Los Ricos wrote:They believe the stars are full of wonder, when they are, in fact, GIANT, BURNING DEMON-SPHERES OF SIGHT-BLINDING, GRAVITY-CREATING, LIFE-ENDING, OVERALL DEADLINESS.
by UniversalCommons » Fri Jan 24, 2020 9:39 pm
by Satuga » Fri Jan 24, 2020 9:41 pm
by Pangurstan » Fri Jan 24, 2020 9:42 pm
by Rojava Free State » Fri Jan 24, 2020 10:04 pm
Rojava Free State wrote:Listen yall. I'm only gonna say it once but I want you to remember it. This ain't a world fit for good men. It seems like you gotta be monstrous just to make it. Gotta have a little bit of darkness within you just to survive. You gotta stoop low everyday it seems like. Stoop all the way down to the devil in these times. And then one day you look in the mirror and you realize that you ain't you anymore. You're just another monster, and thanks to your actions, someone else will eventually become as warped and twisted as you. Never forget that the best of us are just the best of a bad lot. Being at the top of a pile of feces doesn't make you anything but shit like the rest. Never forget that.
by Seangoli » Fri Jan 24, 2020 10:14 pm
Cetacea wrote:You left out Hydro power which using modern verticle shaft turbines are less damaging to the environment and one of my favourite options.
I'm persoally a fan of Small scale Solar + Battery systems- Chernobyl, Fukushima, and Three Mile Island are best considered anomalies
- Decommissioning is being ignored here
I know Nuclear has a lot of things in its favour however the two things you list here are the very reasons why I dont like it. Three melt down incidents in less than 50 years isn't an anomaly its a pattern and decommissioning is a issues right up there with micro-plastic
by Thermodolia » Fri Jan 24, 2020 10:25 pm
The Zravvisk wrote:Isn't one more con of coal power plants that they release more radiation to the surrounding area and cause more cancer than nuclear power plants? I seem to remember hearing about that.
by Thermodolia » Fri Jan 24, 2020 10:27 pm
Seangoli wrote:Cetacea wrote:You left out Hydro power which using modern verticle shaft turbines are less damaging to the environment and one of my favourite options.
I'm persoally a fan of Small scale Solar + Battery systems
I know Nuclear has a lot of things in its favour however the two things you list here are the very reasons why I dont like it. Three melt down incidents in less than 50 years isn't an anomaly its a pattern and decommissioning is a issues right up there with micro-plastic
1. Chernobyl is a anonymous simply because it shouldn't have happened. The operators took measured, direct decisions that were contrary to practically every safety protocol put in place for the specific reactor type. This isn't a case of them screwing up a few things. It was them doing the opposite of what they should have been doing at many points in the process.
2. Three mile was a coolant leak, and ultimately a non-issue in scale.
3. Fukushima was caused by a near apocalyptic earthquake and tsunami. That said, the impact of the contamination is limited. The contamination in the immediate vicinity is negligible, and testing on fish populations in the area has shown that radiation is well below the limits for consumption, and trivial for actual hazards to people.
by Thermodolia » Fri Jan 24, 2020 10:50 pm
Nakena wrote:We, the denizens of NSG, do demand an poll.
Also I always started out with a Coal Power Plant in Sim City but later switched over to Solar.
by Neu California » Fri Jan 24, 2020 10:50 pm
Nakena wrote:We, the denizens of NSG, do demand an poll.
Also I always started out with a Coal Power Plant in Sim City but later switched over to Solar.
by The Sladerstan » Fri Jan 24, 2020 10:59 pm
Rojava Free State wrote:They say the energy of me screaming produces enough power to light up new York city for 1000 years
Come through my drive through and try me. I guarantee America will be able to quit it's addiction to coal and oil that very day
by Thermodolia » Fri Jan 24, 2020 11:41 pm
by Nobel Hobos 2 » Sat Jan 25, 2020 12:11 am
by Blargoblarg » Sat Jan 25, 2020 12:38 am
by Nuroblav » Sat Jan 25, 2020 3:26 am
by The Derpy Democratic Republic Of Herp » Sat Jan 25, 2020 8:41 am
by Novus America » Sat Jan 25, 2020 9:58 am
Cetacea wrote:You left out Hydro power which using modern verticle shaft turbines are less damaging to the environment and one of my favourite options.
I'm persoally a fan of Small scale Solar + Battery systems- Chernobyl, Fukushima, and Three Mile Island are best considered anomalies
- Decommissioning is being ignored here
I know Nuclear has a lot of things in its favour however the two things you list here are the very reasons why I dont like it. Three melt down incidents in less than 50 years isn't an anomaly its a pattern and decommissioning is a issues right up there with micro-plastic
by Page » Sat Jan 25, 2020 11:56 am
Novus America wrote:Cetacea wrote:You left out Hydro power which using modern verticle shaft turbines are less damaging to the environment and one of my favourite options.
I'm persoally a fan of Small scale Solar + Battery systems
I know Nuclear has a lot of things in its favour however the two things you list here are the very reasons why I dont like it. Three melt down incidents in less than 50 years isn't an anomaly its a pattern and decommissioning is a issues right up there with micro-plastic
Nuclear is actually the safest main source: https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.forbes ... -paid/amp/
Three Mile Island killed and hurt no one.
And why decommission nuclear power plants at all? Keep them running indefinitely.
The main advantage of nuclear is it uses the least amount of land and materials per energy produced. And it is the most reliable and consistent.
Also it can be used most places, even underwater.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot], Jetan, Singaporen Empire, The Scandoslavic Empire
Advertisement