Twins of Hearts wrote:The Church of Satan wrote:They didn't equate them with one another. It was an analogy. It illustrated the similarities in how "conflict resolution" would affect the victims. I assumed you knew better.
Owning your wrong would have been as sign of some maturity.
However the backstroke while pointing at me....eh. Not so much.South Reinkalistan wrote:OOC: Ah, I see.
Well I'll be watching with popcorn. Having heard of some of Twins of Heart's past, I'm a helluva lot more sceptical about this campaign.
What you may or may not have heard about me is not relevant, as I and anyone I interacted with in this situation that keeps getting mentioned resolved our conflicts ourselves a good long time ago. This is not about me, rather about the practice of blacklisting and finding a better solution. The entrenchment and crystalized power structure behind the blacklist however, which to remind everyone that I am imperfect. A glaringly obvious statement, given that all of us are imperfect.
Staying focused on the positive, and moving the game in a positive direction is the focus of the whitelist campaign!
OOC: Forcing people to 'play nice' and be friends with others who they evidently don't like hardly sounds like moving the game in a positive direction.
What I've heard about you wasn't great stuff, to be honest. I feel it is relevant because that reflects on you as a person, and when you start pushing a narrative that CONVENIENTLY seems to align with advancing your personal position (through the means of 2 WA telegrams, no less) people such as me start to get sceptical. I've only received one side of the story, but it still doesn't reflect well on your campaign as a whole.
For the record, I wholeheartedly agree with Katganistan. Nobody likes being forced to associate with people they dislike. This just seems like a 'virtuous' attempt to get back at old grudges and perceived misjustice under the guise of an anti-bullying crusade.