Advertisement
by Virtual States » Tue Dec 17, 2019 11:58 pm
by Kenmoria » Wed Dec 18, 2019 12:39 am
Virtual States wrote:OOC: I think there's an important question about mass telegrams that hasn't been asked yet. Can you exclude certain regions from receiving a mass telegram when you write it?
Also, is there a list of "canonical" World Assembly departments/offices/etc somewhere I can look over? I'd like to be more specific than "the appropriate World Assembly office" when I'm writing in character.
by Araraukar » Wed Dec 18, 2019 1:18 am
Maowi wrote:Sethtekia wrote:Sethtekia is in favor for this to be repealed. As Sethtekia employs a Zero Tolerance Airspace edict. Any aircraft in our airspace without expressed permission is to be shot down regardless. And any nation that enters our airspace to aid said aircraft will be destroyed as well.
"Ambassador, in that case, Sethtekia is already in non-compliance with extant World Assembly legislation and will be whether or not this resolution is repealed."
Apologies for absences, non-COVID health issues leave me with very little energy at times.Giovenith wrote:And sorry hun, if you were looking for a forum site where nobody argued, you've come to wrong one.
by Maowi » Wed Dec 18, 2019 4:12 am
Araraukar wrote:Maowi wrote:"Ambassador, in that case, Sethtekia is already in non-compliance with extant World Assembly legislation and will be whether or not this resolution is repealed."
OOC: Clause 7 subclauses of that resolution mean that closed airspace is closed airspace, domestic aircraft excluded, and nothing forces a nation to allow ANY foreign aircraft into their airspace.
by Verdant Haven » Wed Dec 18, 2019 7:28 am
by The Great Nation of Liberty » Wed Dec 18, 2019 8:35 am
by WayNeacTia » Wed Dec 18, 2019 9:59 am
RiderSyl wrote:You'd really think that defenders would communicate with each other about this. I know they're not a hivemind, but at least some level of PR skill would keep Quebecshire and Quebecshire from publically contradicting eac
wait
by Austria-Bohemia-Hungary » Wed Dec 18, 2019 10:02 am
Wayneactia wrote:Happy that people have seen this dumpster fire for what it is and are smashing it into the pavement.
by Superbunny » Wed Dec 18, 2019 11:21 am
by Potted Plants United » Wed Dec 18, 2019 11:58 am
Maowi wrote:OOC: Where are you seeing that?? The only exceptions it makes are for situations where "there are necessary practical reasons for doing so, such as limited capacity or quarantine, or in times of war or economic sanctions." That doesn't allow nations to blanket ban the entry of foreign aircraft.
Superbunny wrote:OOC: I feel like saying "WA Elite" in this forum should qualify as trolling.
Separatist Peoples wrote:"NOPENOPENOPENOPENOPENOPENOPENOPE!"
- Mr. Bell, when introduced to PPU's newest moving plant
by Maowi » Wed Dec 18, 2019 4:19 pm
Potted Plants United wrote:Maowi wrote:OOC: Where are you seeing that?? The only exceptions it makes are for situations where "there are necessary practical reasons for doing so, such as limited capacity or quarantine, or in times of war or economic sanctions." That doesn't allow nations to blanket ban the entry of foreign aircraft.
OOC: Limited capacity. For a system designed only for domestic traffic and use, anyone extra is over capacity. Also, if airspace or parts of it are closed off for all planes, including domestic, and that's made abundantly clear such as via radio communications, then any plane flying into closed airspace can be shot down for that violation alone, because otherwise that resolution would have been wrong strength entirely.
by Superbunny » Fri Dec 20, 2019 10:02 am
Repeal "Civilian Aircraft Accord" was defeated 10,810 votes to 3,695.
by Grays Harbor » Fri Dec 20, 2019 10:51 am
Superbunny wrote:Repeal "Civilian Aircraft Accord" was defeated 10,810 votes to 3,695.
Rest in pieces.
by Saturna1ia » Fri Dec 20, 2019 1:15 pm
Grays Harbor wrote:OOC: Gloating is unwelcome here. Please do not do so.
by Wallenburg » Fri Dec 20, 2019 1:31 pm
by Kenmoria » Fri Dec 20, 2019 2:11 pm
by Grays Harbor » Fri Dec 20, 2019 3:31 pm
by Separatist Peoples » Fri Dec 20, 2019 3:38 pm
by Jebslund » Fri Dec 20, 2019 3:50 pm
by Separatist Peoples » Fri Dec 20, 2019 4:06 pm
by Wallenburg » Fri Dec 20, 2019 4:12 pm
Grays Harbor wrote:Wallenburg wrote:Oh fucking please. Every single voting thread going years back has some post or another responding with satisfaction to the voting result.
There is a difference between expressing satisfaction and outright gloating. I would think with all your experience in the GA you could tell the difference.
by WayNeacTia » Fri Dec 20, 2019 6:00 pm
Grays Harbor wrote:Wallenburg wrote:Oh fucking please. Every single voting thread going years back has some post or another responding with satisfaction to the voting result.
There is a difference between expressing satisfaction and outright gloating. I would think with all your experience in the GA you could tell the difference.
Superbunny wrote:Repeal "Civilian Aircraft Accord" was defeated 10,810 votes to 3,695.
Rest in pieces.
RiderSyl wrote:You'd really think that defenders would communicate with each other about this. I know they're not a hivemind, but at least some level of PR skill would keep Quebecshire and Quebecshire from publically contradicting eac
wait
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement