Vassenor wrote:I would argue that the social stigma is the same for "sex offender", "Sexual assaulter" and "rapist" given that we've previously had arguments on here that a lower-grade sexual assault conviction would ruin someone's life completely.
1. You might argue that but it wouldn't make it true. "Rapist" is considerably worse, even if all are bad. You have no evidence of this.
2. You're ignoring my point that the feminist lobbies mentioned are specifically going after rape convictions and trying to badger the police and courts into violating due process. As has been demonstrated, penetration is required to rape. So your post where you try and whine about how i'm only concerned with mens due process is misinformed in its totality, even if you ignore that even without this problem it's as dumb an argument as pretending the drug war isn't racist because sometimes white hippies also go to jail.
True Refuge wrote:
Please don’t lump me in with MRA types. I’m a MensLib follower myself. I don’t see feminism or women as having orchestrated an evil conspiracy in the law against men. I think that’s a minor discrepancy that should be fixed in due course in the interests of symbolism and consistency.
I also don't think there's a conspiracy. There's a difference between myopic and misandrist bias and a conspiracy. Prejudice does not require intent.
