Advertisement
by USS Monitor » Sat Nov 23, 2019 11:54 am
Candlewhisper Archive wrote:Nouveau Yathrib wrote:
What was the rationale for this change?
Player complaints about the insensitivity of suggesting that there's humour in someone overweight and middle-aged thinking they might be assaulted.
General consensus was that the complaints had something to them, so a change was made.
by Trotterdam » Sat Nov 23, 2019 1:52 pm
I distinctly recall it being complained about multiple times in different threads before the editors decided to do something about it.USS Monitor wrote:Mostly one player complaint that got more attention than it deserved.
by TalAkMaChen » Sun Nov 24, 2019 1:37 pm
The Candy Of Bottles wrote:1295 - Show Trial [Fontenais; ed: Candlewhisper Archive]
The Issue
Previously untouchable mob boss Buff Tony was recently arrested and charged with numerous offences including extortion, racketeering, and money laundering. Public interest is considerable, and the media are asking to be allowed to televise the proceedings.
The Debate
1. “Buff Tony is rumoured to have a long arm, and there are legitimate concerns that the trial will be corrupted,” argues television producer @@RANDOMNAME@@. “The judiciary is only just when it is held accountable by the people, but it’s impractical for the wider public to attend court in person. The media is a powerful conduit to the public and should be allowed to film in court to promote fairness and transparency in the judicial system.”
2. “Allowing the media to film in court will be making a circus out of a serious process,” counters courtroom sketch artist @@RADOMNAME@@, as @@HE@@ puts the finishing touches to an unflattering caricature of you. “The parties will inevitably be grandstanding to the TV cameras instead of making a proper case. While I agree that it is in the public interest to allow @@DEMONYMNOUNPLURAL@@ to witness and report on court proceedings, filming devices should not be permitted in court.”
3. “And what about my client’s right to privacy?” asks the lawyer for Buff Tony, surreptitiously sliding a bulging envelope towards you. “Being on trial is distressing enough and shouldn’t be compounded by parasitic journalists publicizing intimate or embarassing details about a defendant. For the sake of decency, the public shouldn’t be allowed to witness, let alone report on, court proceedings.”
4. “Objection!” yells celebrity attorney Fenix Rong, without making it clear what he is objecting to, but striking a heroic pointing pose as he does so. “Trials should not only be televised, they should be entertaining! Surprise witnesses! Last minute evidence! Shouting at criminals till they break down! That’s what people want to see. Objection, I say, objection!”
The name in option 3 is clearly fixed, but I can't speak for the others. Also, Chrome is telling me "rumoured" in option 0 and "embarassing" in option 2 are misspelled.
by The Candy Of Bottles » Sun Nov 24, 2019 3:21 pm
TalAkMaChen wrote:The Candy Of Bottles wrote:1295 - Show Trial [Fontenais; ed: Candlewhisper Archive]
The Issue
Previously untouchable mob boss Buff Tony was recently arrested and charged with numerous offences including extortion, racketeering, and money laundering. Public interest is considerable, and the media are asking to be allowed to televise the proceedings.
The Debate
1. “Buff Tony is rumoured to have a long arm, and there are legitimate concerns that the trial will be corrupted,” argues television producer @@RANDOMNAME@@. “The judiciary is only just when it is held accountable by the people, but it’s impractical for the wider public to attend court in person. The media is a powerful conduit to the public and should be allowed to film in court to promote fairness and transparency in the judicial system.”
2. “Allowing the media to film in court will be making a circus out of a serious process,” counters courtroom sketch artist @@RADOMNAME@@, as @@HE@@ puts the finishing touches to an unflattering caricature of you. “The parties will inevitably be grandstanding to the TV cameras instead of making a proper case. While I agree that it is in the public interest to allow @@DEMONYMNOUNPLURAL@@ to witness and report on court proceedings, filming devices should not be permitted in court.”
3. “And what about my client’s right to privacy?” asks the lawyer for Buff Tony, surreptitiously sliding a bulging envelope towards you. “Being on trial is distressing enough and shouldn’t be compounded by parasitic journalists publicizing intimate or embarassing details about a defendant. For the sake of decency, the public shouldn’t be allowed to witness, let alone report on, court proceedings.”
4. “Objection!” yells celebrity attorney Fenix Rong, without making it clear what he is objecting to, but striking a heroic pointing pose as he does so. “Trials should not only be televised, they should be entertaining! Surprise witnesses! Last minute evidence! Shouting at criminals till they break down! That’s what people want to see. Objection, I say, objection!”
The name in option 3 is clearly fixed, but I can't speak for the others. Also, Chrome is telling me "rumoured" in option 0 and "embarassing" in option 2 are misspelled.
Names of Tony and Rong are fixed, rest is random. Also, that's called "British English", you can set that in Chrome as well to "accept" as correct. Nothing wrong with either word. The draft just had three options, though. Something's changed there
by TalAkMaChen » Tue Nov 26, 2019 6:53 am
Wild-haired scientist @@randomname@@ barrels into your office, panting heavily. “Stop! We CAN have our cake and eat it too! We should make the drop, but insist on cash payment. Then, we contaminate the bank-notes with radioactive material, and watch as the hostage-takers, their associates and their families die from radiation poisoning. That basically solves the problem!”
by Jutsa » Tue Nov 26, 2019 10:14 am
Huh? I may have already fixed this and can't remember, but everything looks fine for me. O_oTalAkMaChen wrote:PS for Jutsa: In the grand list, at #1215 something's missing at the end of option 4, and #1216 still has "Furry Things" instead of @@NAME@@ in the debate text.
Will add it next time, probably.Trotterdam wrote:Heads up that there's a new variant option on #390 to look for. It's part of a chain, so getting it might not be easy...
Huh. Had that one on my list of missing options (somehow). What a... strangely specific flag.TalAkMaChen wrote:Finally, 1214, option 2: Very minor differences in the text compared to option 1.
huwuhSanctaria wrote:One other issue in the game has the new policy actually.
This Lady’s Not for Turning
Strahcoin wrote:For Issue #905 (Stage Directions), there is a fourth option for my nation.
Sweet.
There wasn’t much size difference from the infants I normally work with, though babies wail and wriggle a lot less.
TalAkMaChen wrote:Woah. I guess this took long to discover: Option 3 of issue 186.
by Jutsa » Wed Nov 27, 2019 10:17 pm
The Issue
You and your family are at a Maxxmas party held by your Minister of Mirth, Merriment and Income Taxation when your great-aunt — overcome by too much Maxxmas cheer — begins castigating your host for not decorating in traditional Maxxmas colours, lamenting “It’s like you don’t even understand the holiday!” Suddenly, you hear some sleigh bells jingling and ring-ting-tingling outside: a band of merry Maxxmas carollers!
The Debate
1. As the urchins polish off ‘O, Little Town of @@CAPITAL@@’, the diminutive leader of the group hobbles forward on a crutch. “Beggin’ yer leadership’s pardon, but may I say I feels so gratified to see you an’ yours all together. Whever a toff or an ’umble personage like me, Maxxmas is when fam’ly an’ friends share goodwill an’ ’appiness. Who needs posh gifts or a warm blanket — long as yer wiv fam’ly? You should tells people so, you know, in yer big Maxxmas speech.”
2. An urchin in a top hat and a slightly worn waistcoat steps forward. “But, as I say to me more hintimate friends, Maxxmas is a time for ’elpin’ them of lesser means than meself. And, @@LEADER@@, if someone of your quality was seen givin’ to good causes, your charitable nature would be an example to them that so esteem you.” He rattles a donation tin.
*3. “Here, take it and go!” snaps the Minister of Big Business, dumping one @@CURRENCY@@ into the tin. “@@LEADER@@, darling, Maxxmas is a time for fabulous parties and finalising big plans. Talking of which, how about that investment in my department? Oh, I must have left the forecasts by the champagne fountain. Silly me!” [Alcohol is legal]
*4. “Here, take it and go!” snaps the Minister of Big Business, dumping one @@CURRENCY@@ into the tin. “@@LEADER@@, darling, Maxxmas is a time for fabulous parties and finalising big plans. Talking of which, how about that investment in my department? Oh, I must have left the forecasts by the champagne fountain. Silly me! Oh, come now — one treat won’t break the ban...” [Alcohol is illegal]
5. “I’ll tell you what Maxxmas is for,” laughs your brother, seizing the urchins’ donation tin and bolting the door. “Presents piled ten stories high, all with my name on them! Diamond-studded watches, cashmere suits, even a private helicopter! The one reason Maxxmas exists is to teach people that only present-buying is a true expression of love — an advertising campaign to remind them will get everyone shopping.”
**6. “Talk about greed!” scoffs your uncle, who is currently hoarding a whole turkey for himself. “You don’t need presents; Maxxmas is all about the big family dinner. A good one heals fractured families — the art must be taught in schools: that moist roast turkey... and crispy potatoes... and dessert...” He keels over, saliva forming a puddle. [Must not be vegetarian]
**7. “Talk about greed!” scoffs your uncle, who is currently hoarding a whole nut roast for himself. “You don’t need presents; Maxxmas is all about big family dinner. A good one heals fractured families — the art must be taught in schools: that rich savoury nut roast... and crispy potatoes... and dessert...” He keels over, saliva forming a puddle. [Must be vegetarian]
8. “Haven’t we forgotten that Maxxmas is a religious holiday?” screams your niece. “We should celebrate the way that the early Order of Maxx did: by gathering in sackcloth and ashes, holding hands and silently condemning all displays of gaudy commercialism, self-indulgence and violence.”
9. “Shh!” hisses your aunt, covering your uncle’s mouth with her hand. By her side sits a TV magazine with a series of films marked off: ‘It’s Too Soon for Maxxmas’, ‘I Can’t Wait for Maxxmas’, ‘It’s Finally Maxxmas’ and ‘Oh, Just Sod Off Maxxmas’. “This viewing gets better every year. This holiday would be far more restful if everyone stopped making a fuss and just grabbed a TV dinner and the remote.”
by The Free Joy State » Wed Nov 27, 2019 11:37 pm
Jutsa wrote:Got another version of #1291! Go prohibition and compulsory vegetarianism!
Combining the previous report with this one:
One slight issue: 6 says "about the big family dinner", but 7 just says "about big family dinner". Is that supposed to be the case?
Also, option 8 may be banned from nations that are atheist, though then again this whole issue might be restricted. Not sure; could be a variant to option 9 as well, pointing this out, but something tells me that's a no. Just curious.
by Jutsa » Thu Nov 28, 2019 9:42 am
by Racoda » Fri Nov 29, 2019 4:25 pm
by Trotterdam » Fri Nov 29, 2019 4:59 pm
#1296 Once Upon a Time
The Issue
On the night before Maxxmas, and the day of as well, national headlines had a story to tell. Between North and South Palisade, the endless war grew dire, but — for a couple of days — the two sides ceased fire. On the land that a mere day ago had been shelled, a jolly game of football was held, but as your army had joined in the merriment, it became quite an issue for your national parliament.
The Debate
1. "How could they do this? What could this mean?" your Minister of War shouts and screams. "The thought of our soldiers getting along with North Palisade! This was their opportunity to launch a foray! Forget about the reason, this is an act of treason, and war is a battle that should be fought, not played. Our national pride is now at stake, and letting this slide would be a mistake. The consequence for befriending a rival: a homecoming soldier should be arrested 'pon arrival. Let it be declared — from coast to coast — fraternising with foes is what we hate most."
2. "But Maxxmas is the most wonderful time of the year," cries General @@RANDOMLASTNAME@@, shedding a tear. "Our soldiers fight day and night without rest, killing people and living in fear and distress. The sacred tradition of peace amongst all is something that unites nations, both great and small. Forget about the victory we could have had if we fought. It'd be best if every Maxxmas we ceased fire on the spot!"
3. "Maxxmas is a stupid holiday with an equally stupid tradition." You look up in dismay to find the infamous Krampus S. Grinchen. "Give a gift this and peace on Earth that! I could pick better names than Maxxmas out of a hat!" He finally mutters after a ghastly tirade, "Banning it would be the first decent decision you've ever made."
Issue by Jutsa
Edited by Baggieland
by Jutsa » Sun Dec 01, 2019 9:48 pm
by Bears Armed Mission » Mon Dec 02, 2019 8:55 am
Trotterdam wrote:[box]#1296 Once Upon a Time
The Issue
On the night before Maxxmas, and the day of as well, national headlines had a story to tell. Between North and South Palisade, the endless war grew dire, but — for a couple of days — the two sides ceased fire. On the land that a mere day ago had been shelled, a jolly game of football was held, but as your army had joined in the merriment, it became quite an issue for your national parliament.
by TalAkMaChen » Mon Dec 02, 2019 9:21 am
“Kids these days, they’re geni.. geniei... uh... geniuses!” exclaims @@randomname@@, your Minister of Solutions. “This is the best idea we’ve had in a while! There’s always demagogues, rebels and dissenters we need to put down. With your permission, perhaps we can put these children to work in slandering them. It’s a subtler approach than a bullet to the head, killing the credibility of their ideas. The kids can, as they say, ‘roast’ the dissenters, and make you look great in comparison!”
by Trotterdam » Mon Dec 02, 2019 9:56 am
It appears that you mean #636?TalAkMaChen wrote:#363
by TalAkMaChen » Mon Dec 02, 2019 11:31 am
by Racoda » Mon Dec 02, 2019 8:31 pm
by Jutsa » Tue Dec 03, 2019 1:06 am
Bears Armed Mission wrote:Trotterdam wrote:[box]#1296 Once Upon a Time
The Issue
On the night before Maxxmas, and the day of as well, national headlines had a story to tell. Between North and South Palisade, the endless war grew dire, but — for a couple of days — the two sides ceased fire. On the land that a mere day ago had been shelled, a jolly game of football was held, but as your army had joined in the merriment, it became quite an issue for your national parliament.
When did our army become part of that war?
by TalAkMaChen » Tue Dec 03, 2019 5:08 am
).
)
by Zwangzug » Tue Dec 03, 2019 5:12 am
TalAkMaChen wrote: It could of course also be that there were amendments done over the years.
by TalAkMaChen » Tue Dec 03, 2019 7:44 am
#1297: What Are You Hiding in Your Genes? [Daarwyrth; ed: Zwangzug]
The Issue
With DNA tests from My23AncestralHeritages becoming increasingly popular across the globe, many @@DEMONYMNOUNPLURAL@@ have sent their saliva to complete strangers in a lab to find out their genetic ancestry. Yesterday, as part of her longstanding diatribe against @@NAME@@, the Supreme Leader of Blackacre posted on her Twitcher account that your Minister of Justice is related to one of your nation’s most dangerous criminals.
The Debate
1. “I assure you, I had no idea this criminal was my grandmother’s brother’s second wife’s sister’s son’s grandchild!” the Minister of Justice announces. “I mean sure, he seemed familiar when I granted him that request for leniency, and a cellphone, and a plasma TV... but that’s beside the point. The privacy of millions of our citizens is in danger! Greedy companies like this one will sell sensitive information such as DNA profiles to anyone who pays the right price, like those no-good slime-balls from Blackacre. For the good of our people — and my family’s remaining secrets — you need to regulate DNA tests and ensure that individuals’ information stays in safe hands!”
2. “Now, now, let’s not do anything too hasty,” tuts @@RANDOMNAME@@, CEO of My23AncestralHeritages. “My company provides legitimate goods and services to legitimate customers, be they @@DEMONYMNOUNPLURAL@@ or men in black suits and dark sunglasses explicitly claiming not to be from Blackacre. Information is a commodity too, so why not sell it? Relax some of those draconian privacy laws of yours and give the economy a big boost by opening up the market for information brokers! After all, your citizens surely have nothing to hide...”
3. “No, no, no, NO!” screeches Minister of Intelligence @@RANDOMFIRSTNAME@@ ‘008’ @@RANDOMLASTNAME@@, as @@HE@@ emerges from behind a curtain in your office. “I’ve had enough of this! Everyone is learning everything about everyone and that’s my job, for Violet’s sake! Not only do you need to ban companies like My23AncestralHeritages, but you also need to drastically limit what information can be released to the public! Or do you want your enemies to know all your genetic codes?”
4. “You know, there is an opportunity here,” points out @@RANDOMNAME@@. “The amount of genetic data that company has is staggering. Think of what we could do if they partnered with our brilliant scientists. We could take the best genetic samples and secretly engineer vat-grown soldiers, bred for fighting strength and absolute loyalty to you, their supreme leader!”
Issue by The Most Serene Monarchy of Daarwyrth
Edited by Zwangzug
by Trotterdam » Tue Dec 03, 2019 9:26 am
Can confirm.TalAkMaChen wrote:#572, option 3 is not available for No-Computer policy
It's probably the same, with only the effect line being different.TalAkMaChen wrote:#684 [...]
There's a new option 5 to this one for Vegetarism nations, but I don't have the text yet.
She has previously been named as "Valeria Drake".TalAkMaChen wrote:Edit: I had the Supreme Leader of Blackacre as female, thus the she/her in the titles. Could also be random, that remains to be checked?
by Jutsa » Tue Dec 03, 2019 10:37 am
Oh my god.#1297: What Are You Hiding in Your Genes?
by TalAkMaChen » Tue Dec 03, 2019 12:04 pm
Gandoor wrote:#1261: Anything You Can Do, I Can Do Better
Issue by: Chan Island
Edited by: Candlewhisper Archive
Yesterday evening, talk radio pundit @@RANDOMFEMALENAME_1@@ launched a scathing critique of your “ridiculously incompetent Transport Minister” and the minister’s “terrible mismanagement of timetables”. Unfortunately, said minister angrily phoned in to argue her case, and foolishly told the talkshow host that if she thought she could do better, she’d be welcome to try. Somewhat predictably, @@RANDOMLASTNAME_1@@ is now outside the parliament building, ready to give it a go.
by Trotterdam » Tue Dec 03, 2019 2:45 pm
Users browsing this forum: No registered users