MAGAThread XVIII: The Authority Is Total

[The East Marches II]

Have you considered taking up drinking to relieve that level of blackpill? I might need to after that dose.

Way ahead of you.

Atta boy!

[San Montalbano]

I'm a veteran what are you talking about, 7 years 31 Bravo

3 years. Royal Artillery. And I made an assumption.

yeah....yeah you did make an assumption

But I do agree, Ukraine might be picking the horse in this race. The President of Ukraine will also probably support this probe as well, considering if it blows up it make him look bad, so he will most likley back this, supporting Trump.

[Fartsniffage]

3 years. Royal Artillery. And I made an assumption.

yeah....yeah you did make an assumption

But I do agree, Ukraine might be picking the horse in this race. The President of Ukraine will also probably support this probe as well, considering if it blows up it make him look bad, so he will most likley back this, supporting Trump.

But you were an MP. So basically scum anyway.

And posts up the thread seem to suggest this probe isn't what your source said it is.

[San Montalbano]

yeah....yeah you did make an assumption

But I do agree, Ukraine might be picking the horse in this race. The President of Ukraine will also probably support this probe as well, considering if it blows up it make him look bad, so he will most likley back this, supporting Trump.

But you were an MP. So basically scum anyway.

And posts up the thread seem to suggest this probe isn't what your source said it is.

I knew you were going to say that LOL, that's okay we get it all the time

meh, differen't source, I think Reuters is solid and seems to be trusted by most everybody.

[Greater Miami Shores]

Strange how every time I suggest with one of my posts, articles, links, videos and comments Hunter Biden and Vice President Joe Biden might be corrupt, I get put down, made fun of, and my sources are wrong, biased right wing propaganda.

[Vassenor]

Strange how every time I suggest with one of my posts, articles, links, videos and comments Hunter Biden and Vice President Joe Biden might be corrupt, I get put down, made fun of, and my sources are wrong, biased right wing propaganda.

And what has actually been proven against them?

[Great Confederacy of Commonwealth States]

The corruption of the Bidens is immaterial to the impeachment.

[The East Marches II]

The corruption of the Bidens is immaterial to the impeachment.

This is a good take. I don't usually agree with you.

[Fartsniffage]

The corruption of the Bidens is immaterial to the impeachment.

It really isn't. If they're under investigation then it bolsters Trump support in a political process.

[The East Marches II]

Strange how every time I suggest with one of my posts, articles, links, videos and comments Hunter Biden and Vice President Joe Biden might be corrupt, I get put down, made fun of, and my sources are wrong, biased right wing propaganda.

And what has actually been proven against them?

We can post evidence of all times to you Vassenor. You can lead a horse to water but God knows getting them to drink, or you to actually read a source, is an impossible task.

[Gormwood]

The corruption of the Bidens is immaterial to the impeachment.

So many people hedged their bets on this nontroversy destroying the inquiry. :^]

[Vassenor]

The corruption of the Bidens is immaterial to the impeachment.

It really isn't. If they're under investigation then it bolsters Trump support in a political process.

And as has been explained this investigation doesn't touch them.

[The East Marches II]

The corruption of the Bidens is immaterial to the impeachment.

So many people hedged their bets on this nontroversy destroying the inquiry. :^]

It's too late for his line even if he is correct. The Democrats made Hunter's innocence a lynchpin of their assault. Oops.

Mistakes were made.

[Gormwood]

The corruption of the Bidens is immaterial to the impeachment.

It really isn't. If they're under investigation then it bolsters Trump support in a political process.

It's not even an investigation of the Bidens. It's a double check review of all the corruption cases.

[Fartsniffage]

The corruption of the Bidens is immaterial to the impeachment.

So many people hedged their bets on this nontroversy destroying the inquiry. :^]

It's not going to destroy the inquiry. It's going to give political cushions to the Republicans in the Senate who vote not guilty.

[Greater Miami Shores]

The corruption of the Bidens is immaterial to the impeachment.

Well I do know one thing, if this impeachment process moves to the Senate the Republicans are going to call, Hunter Biden, Partisan Democrat Adam Schiff and Eric Ciaramella, who might or might not be the whistleblower and perhaps Democrat Vice President Joe Biden. The rest is up to the Republicans on the committee not me. I am a nobody.

[Vassenor]

So many people hedged their bets on this nontroversy destroying the inquiry. :^]

It's too late for his line even if he is correct. The Democrats made Hunter's innocence a lynchpin of their assault. Oops.

Mistakes were made.

Did they? It was my understanding was that the case was Trump abusing his office for personal gain.

[San Montalbano]

So many people hedged their bets on this nontroversy destroying the inquiry. :^]

It's too late for his line even if he is correct. The Democrats made Hunter's innocence a lynchpin of their assault. Oops.

Mistakes were made.

I'm sorry, left or right wing, but how dumb are they to rely on Hunter innocence, this dude has been trouble multiple times and just recently now got sued for child support.

[Fartsniffage]

It really isn't. If they're under investigation then it bolsters Trump support in a political process.

And as has been explained this investigation doesn't touch them.

And I've told you that it doesn't matter. We'll see who was wrong as the process continues.

[The Black Forrest]

Strange how every time I suggest with one of my posts, articles, links, videos and comments Hunter Biden and Vice President Joe Biden might be corrupt, I get put down, made fun of, and my sources are wrong, biased right wing propaganda.

Here is the thing of it.

What the Biden's did is irrelevant to the claims and the process against Trump.

If they were corrupt, why hasn't the RNC filed lawsuits against them?

The FBI isn't limited in investigating them. Even under the claim of election politics; crimes would not be ignored.

The only evidence being offered are conspiracy theories.

[Great Confederacy of Commonwealth States]

The corruption of the Bidens is immaterial to the impeachment.

It really isn't. If they're under investigation then it bolsters Trump support in a political process.

Sure. But even if H. Biden committed a crime, then Trump’s subsequent handling was still criminal because of the personal quid pro quo and the use improper channels.

Politically nothing is unimportant, but legally, from the perspective of criminal law, whether there was corruption is not important, and we should not pretend like it makes a legal difference.

[Fartsniffage]

It really isn't. If they're under investigation then it bolsters Trump support in a political process.

Sure. But even if H. Biden committed a crime, then Trump’s subsequent handling was still criminal because of the personal quid pro quo and the use improper channels.

Politically nothing is unimportant, but legally, from the perspective of criminal law, whether there was corruption is not important, and we should not pretend like it makes a legal difference.

Impeachment isn't a legal process, it's a political one.

[The East Marches II]

It's too late for his line even if he is correct. The Democrats made Hunter's innocence a lynchpin of their assault. Oops.

Mistakes were made.

Did they? It was my understanding was that the case was Trump abusing his office for personal gain.

You're understanding was wrong but this isn't particularly surprising given your relative isolation from the States and unwillingness to read other sources which might contradict your worldview. I watched the CNN coverage of the first two days and that was one of things they chose to build on as proof it was abuse of office.

[Gormwood]

It really isn't. If they're under investigation then it bolsters Trump support in a political process.

Sure. But even if H. Biden committed a crime, then Trump’s subsequent handling was still criminal because of the personal quid pro quo and the use improper channels.

Politically nothing is unimportant, but legally, from the perspective of criminal law, whether there was corruption is not important, and we should not pretend like it makes a legal difference.

Plus Sondland made it clear Trump didn't give a shit about Biden's innocence or guilt beyond Ukraine announcing an investigation to shit on Biden's poll numbers.

[Fartsniffage]

Did they? It was my understanding was that the case was Trump abusing his office for personal gain.

You're understanding was wrong but this isn't particularly surprising given your relative isolation from the States and unwillingness to read other sources which might contradict your worldview. I watched the CNN coverage of the first two days and that was one of things they chose to build on as proof it was abuse of office.

You just agreed with each other. Nice.