Voter suppression is indeed a con.
Advertisement
by Vassenor » Wed Oct 02, 2019 8:35 am
by Nea Byzantia » Wed Oct 02, 2019 8:42 am
by Spirit of Hope » Wed Oct 02, 2019 8:45 am
Greater Miami Shores wrote:Austria-Bohemia-Hungary wrote:This is a complete nonsense (and by now completely false as we know it) deflection from the fact that inviting any foreign government to meddle in the American democratic process is and has been impeachable offences since the fricken founding of the United States of America all the fricken way back to the fricken 1780's.
So you are saying Democrats ain't corrupt but Republicans and Donnie are? lol.
Imperializt Russia wrote:Support biblical marriage! One SoH and as many wives and sex slaves as he can afford!
by Vassenor » Wed Oct 02, 2019 8:47 am
by Proctopeo » Wed Oct 02, 2019 8:50 am
Vassenor wrote:Nea Byzantia wrote:What voter suppression?
The voter suppression that the GOP admitted to.
by Ngelmish » Wed Oct 02, 2019 8:52 am
by Evil Dictators Happyland » Wed Oct 02, 2019 8:52 am
Greater Miami Shores wrote:Austria-Bohemia-Hungary wrote:This is a complete nonsense (and by now completely false as we know it) deflection from the fact that inviting any foreign government to meddle in the American democratic process is and has been impeachable offences since the fricken founding of the United States of America all the fricken way back to the fricken 1780's.
So you are saying Democrats ain't corrupt but Republicans and Donnie are? lol.
by Ifreann » Wed Oct 02, 2019 8:57 am
by The Derpy Democratic Republic Of Herp » Wed Oct 02, 2019 8:57 am
by San Lumen » Wed Oct 02, 2019 8:59 am
Ifreann wrote:Proctopeo wrote:Clinton's stupidity and overconfidence is voter suppression now
>motherjones
opinion discarded
Attorney General Brad Schimel suggests Donald Trump won Wisconsin because of the state's voter ID law
Wisconsin Republican connects voter ID, GOP wins
Schimel: Voter ID Helped Trump Win Wisconsin
by The Derpy Democratic Republic Of Herp » Wed Oct 02, 2019 8:59 am
Nea Byzantia wrote:Austria-Bohemia-Hungary wrote:As I said if you want to continue to justify Donald Trump's recent interactions with various foreign governments regarding Mr. Biden's presidential campaign you will have to put the whole of the fricken Constitution in the fricken trash can. Do you wish to do that?
Edit: Not that the 200+ year old document founding the United States (and that he swore a solemn oath to defend) is worth any more than mere toilet paper to Donald J. Trump.
It wasn't worth much to most Presidents; they simply trample on it whenever it suits their interests to do so.
by Proctopeo » Wed Oct 02, 2019 9:02 am
Ifreann wrote:Proctopeo wrote:Clinton's stupidity and overconfidence is voter suppression now
>motherjones
opinion discarded
Attorney General Brad Schimel suggests Donald Trump won Wisconsin because of the state's voter ID law
Wisconsin Republican connects voter ID, GOP wins
Schimel: Voter ID Helped Trump Win Wisconsin
by Gormwood » Wed Oct 02, 2019 9:03 am
Proctopeo wrote:
And this paints a slightly different picture: an uncertain picture. And one that says nothing of Michigan and Pennsylvania, either.
Though I do question the postulation that voter ID constitutes "voter suppression". Largely unnecessary, as it doesn't work to stop most voter fraud (it can't stop the Chi Town "vote early vote often" principle, nothing can stop that), but I fail to see it as "suppression".
by Spirit of Hope » Wed Oct 02, 2019 9:06 am
Proctopeo wrote:
And this paints a slightly different picture: an uncertain picture. And one that says nothing of Michigan and Pennsylvania, either.
Though I do question the postulation that voter ID constitutes "voter suppression". Largely unnecessary, as it doesn't work to stop most voter fraud (it can't stop the Chi Town "vote early vote often" principle, nothing can stop that), but I fail to see it as "suppression".
Imperializt Russia wrote:Support biblical marriage! One SoH and as many wives and sex slaves as he can afford!
by Ifreann » Wed Oct 02, 2019 9:07 am
Proctopeo wrote:
And this paints a slightly different picture: an uncertain picture. And one that says nothing of Michigan and Pennsylvania, either.
Though I do question the postulation that voter ID constitutes "voter suppression". Largely unnecessary, as it doesn't work to stop most voter fraud (it can't stop the Chi Town "vote early vote often" principle, nothing can stop that), but I fail to see it as "suppression".
by Thermodolia » Wed Oct 02, 2019 9:10 am
by Thermodolia » Wed Oct 02, 2019 9:12 am
Spirit of Hope wrote:Proctopeo wrote:And this paints a slightly different picture: an uncertain picture. And one that says nothing of Michigan and Pennsylvania, either.
Though I do question the postulation that voter ID constitutes "voter suppression". Largely unnecessary, as it doesn't work to stop most voter fraud (it can't stop the Chi Town "vote early vote often" principle, nothing can stop that), but I fail to see it as "suppression".
I'm on my phone so I can't link the specifics, but Democrat voters are far less likely to have an ID than Republican voters. This means an ID requirement to vote will turn away more Democrats than Republicans. Though to be fair it probably didnt make a huge difference for the Presidential election.
by Gormwood » Wed Oct 02, 2019 9:14 am
Thermodolia wrote:Spirit of Hope wrote:I'm on my phone so I can't link the specifics, but Democrat voters are far less likely to have an ID than Republican voters. This means an ID requirement to vote will turn away more Democrats than Republicans. Though to be fair it probably didnt make a huge difference for the Presidential election.
This can be fixed by making voter IDs easier to obtain
by Austria-Bohemia-Hungary » Wed Oct 02, 2019 9:17 am
Thermodolia wrote:Spirit of Hope wrote:I'm on my phone so I can't link the specifics, but Democrat voters are far less likely to have an ID than Republican voters. This means an ID requirement to vote will turn away more Democrats than Republicans. Though to be fair it probably didnt make a huge difference for the Presidential election.
This can be fixed by making voter IDs easier to obtain
by Cannot think of a name » Wed Oct 02, 2019 9:24 am
Austria-Bohemia-Hungary wrote:Thermodolia wrote:This can be fixed by making voter IDs easier to obtain
Meanwhile in Sweden: Valid ID's for voting: Vote card that the national post office mails everybody when it's due, and any one of these: Driver's license, passport, national ID card, bringing your mother along to verify your ID...
Why is this so difficult over there?
by Gormwood » Wed Oct 02, 2019 9:28 am
by Cannot think of a name » Wed Oct 02, 2019 9:34 am
Gormwood wrote:Still rekking Jyna.
Many Americans haven't felt the burden of Trump's tariffs. They're about to
It's like a cartton depiction of a scam.
A Trump hotel mystery: Giant reservations followed by empty rooms
And things just keep getting more interesting.
Another whistleblower has apparently come forward alleging that 'inappropriate' steps were taking to influence an audit of Trump's taxes
Either Donny has a wet toilet paper ego, or there's some serious shit waiting to be uncovered.
by Thermodolia » Wed Oct 02, 2019 10:36 am
Cannot think of a name wrote:Gormwood wrote:Still rekking Jyna.
Many Americans haven't felt the burden of Trump's tariffs. They're about to
It's like a cartton depiction of a scam.
A Trump hotel mystery: Giant reservations followed by empty rooms
And things just keep getting more interesting.
Another whistleblower has apparently come forward alleging that 'inappropriate' steps were taking to influence an audit of Trump's taxes
Either Donny has a wet toilet paper ego, or there's some serious shit waiting to be uncovered.
I'm still going with the former, just knowing what a real estate developer's tax returns look like. Even though it is perfectly normal and by design that they essentially show the developer taking a loss every year that doesn't really reflect their actual worth and he just can't stand for people to see that.
Also, is this the third whistleblower or the second one again?
by Nea Byzantia » Wed Oct 02, 2019 10:37 am
Vassenor wrote:Nea Byzantia wrote:What voter suppression?
The voter suppression that the GOP admitted to.
by Austria-Bohemia-Hungary » Wed Oct 02, 2019 10:38 am
Thermodolia wrote:Cannot think of a name wrote:I'm still going with the former, just knowing what a real estate developer's tax returns look like. Even though it is perfectly normal and by design that they essentially show the developer taking a loss every year that doesn't really reflect their actual worth and he just can't stand for people to see that.
Also, is this the third whistleblower or the second one again?
Wait there’s two of them?
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Aadhiris, Big Eyed Animation, Hidrandia, Ifreann, Ineva, Juansonia, Katinea, Lagene, Neu California, Ors Might, The Jamesian Republic
Advertisement