I'm curious; do you believe that "Alt-right killed more" is a convenient excuse to absolve crimes you sympathise with?
I'd assume not, but plenty of people like to have double standards on this kind of things, I'm sure you understand.
Advertisement

by Hirota » Thu Aug 15, 2019 1:13 am
I'm curious; do you believe that "Alt-right killed more" is a convenient excuse to absolve crimes you sympathise with?

by Cekoviu » Thu Aug 15, 2019 11:00 am
Hirota wrote:I'm curious; do you believe that "Alt-right killed more" is a convenient excuse to absolve crimes you sympathise with?Gormwood wrote:Tried. The only person he killed was himself. Next to the double digit counts of recent shootings?
I'd assume not, but plenty of people like to have double standards on this kind of things, I'm sure you understand.

by Bear Stearns » Thu Aug 15, 2019 11:22 am

by Breaking Badlands » Thu Aug 15, 2019 11:29 am

by Kowani » Thu Aug 15, 2019 11:38 am

by Gormwood » Thu Aug 15, 2019 12:15 pm
by The Emerald Legion » Thu Aug 15, 2019 12:45 pm

by LiberNovusAmericae » Thu Aug 15, 2019 2:11 pm

by Kowani » Thu Aug 15, 2019 2:22 pm

by Gormwood » Thu Aug 15, 2019 2:32 pm

by Breaking Badlands » Sun Aug 18, 2019 5:12 pm

by The Sherpa Empire » Sun Aug 18, 2019 5:17 pm

by Nova Cyberia » Sun Aug 18, 2019 5:18 pm
by Cannot think of a name » Mon Aug 19, 2019 5:12 pm
He said that the film does not take sides politically, and that his goal was instead to satirize “both sides” of the partisan divide.
“Our ambition was to poke at both sides of the aisle equally,” he wrote. “We seek to entertain and unify, not enrage and divide. It is up to the viewers to decide what their takeaway will be.”
...
Zobel said the film has been misunderstood. He said it was actually about partisanship, and how both sides fail to fully hear their opponents’ views.
“I wanted to make a fun, action thriller that satirized this moment in our culture — where we jump to assume we know someone’s beliefs because of which ‘team’ we think they’re on… and then start shouting at them,” he wrote. “This rush to judgment is one of the most relevant problems of our time.”
...
Universal has not screened the film for critics, so the political content of the final cut is still largely a matter of conjecture. An early draft of the script obtained by Variety makes clear that the original intention was to depict working-class conservatives as the heroes. They are kidnapped and hunted by “liberal elites,” one of whom says “Climate change is real” before blowing his victim away. One of the good guys talks about the “Deep State,” and another fantasizes about going on “Hannity” to expose the conspiracy.
...
“While some outlets have indicated that test screenings for ‘The Hunt’ resulted in negative audience feedback; in fact, the film was very well-received and tallied one of the highest test scores for an original Blumhouse film,” a Universal spokesperson said. “Additionally, no audience members in attendance at the test screening expressed discomfort with any political discussion in the film. While reports also say ‘The Hunt’ was formerly titled ‘Red State vs. Blue State,’ that was never the working title for the film at any point throughout the development process, nor appeared on any status reports under that name.”

by Munkcestrian Republic » Tue Aug 20, 2019 9:03 am
Nova Cyberia wrote:Obviously, I believe it doesn't but I still fully believe Universal should release the film. It gives a nice peek into the demented psyche of Hollwood.


by Springfeal » Tue Aug 20, 2019 8:32 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Askio, Cole Whyte-Gurney, Comestiqua, Crumpetopia, Gotland and Oland, Hanalia, Hurdergaryp, Ifreann, J Andrew Murray, Narilamb, Nicolo Machiavelli, Old Britannia and Ireland, Ostroeuropa, Platypus Bureaucracy, Semi-Sentient Tumbleweed, Sena Iulia, Unogonduria, Valrifell, Velstrania
Advertisement